BMJ  2006;333:679 (30 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.38919.495718.AE (published 7 August 2006)

Research

Infertility, infertility treatment, and congenital malformations: Danish national birth cohort

¹ Danish Epidemiology Science Centre, Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Public Health, University of Aarhus, DK 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark, ² Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, MD A3-05, USA, ³ Perinatal Epidemiological Research Unit, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, DK 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark, ⁴ Center for the Prevention of Congenital Malformations, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, DK 5000 Odense C, Denmark, ⁵ Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA

Abstract

Objectives To examine whether infertile couples (with a time to pregnancy of > 12 months), who conceive naturally or after treatment, give birth to children with an increased prevalence of congenital malformations.

Design Longitudinal study.

Setting Danish national birth cohort.

Participants Three groups of liveborn children and their mothers: 50 897 singletons and 1366 twins born of fertile couples (time to pregnancy 12 months), 5764 singletons and 100 twins born of infertile couples who conceived naturally (time to pregnancy > 12 months), and 4588 singletons and 1690 twins born after infertility treatment.

Main outcome measures Prevalence of congenital malformations determined from hospital discharge diagnoses.

Results Compared with singletons born of fertile couples, singletons born of infertile couples who conceived naturally or after treatment had a higher prevalence of congenital malformations—hazard ratios 1.20 (95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.35) and 1.39 (1.23 to 1.57). The overall prevalence of congenital malformations increased with increasing time to pregnancy. When the analysis was restricted to singletons born of infertile couples, babies born after treatment had an increased prevalence of genital organ malformations (hazard ratio 2.32, 1.24 to 4.35) compared with babies conceived naturally. No significant differences existed in the overall prevalence of congenital malformations among twins.

Conclusions Hormonal treatment for infertility may be related to the occurrence of malformations of genital organs, but our results suggest that the reported increased prevalence of congenital malformations seen in singletons born after assisted reproductive technology is partly due to the underlying infertility or its determinants. The association between untreated infertility and congenital malformations warrants further examination.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Congenital malformations may be linked to infertility
BMJ 2006 333: 0. [Full Text]

Congenital anomalies after treatment for infertility

Soo-Mi Park, Raj Mathur, and Gordon C S Smith
BMJ 2006 333: 665-666. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Abu-Musa, A. A., Nassar, A. H., Usta, I. M. (2008). Attitude of women with IVF and spontaneous pregnancies towards prenatal screening. Hum Reprod 0: den291v1-6 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Ramlau-Hansen, C. H., Thulstrup, A. M., Olsen, J., Bonde, J. P. (2008). Parental Subfecundity and Risk of Decreased Semen Quality in the Male Offspring: A Follow-up Study. Am J Epidemiol 167: 1458-1464 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Glinianaia, S.V., Rankin, J., Wright, C. (2008). Congenital anomalies in twins: a register-based study. Hum Reprod 23: 1306-1311 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Johnson, M. H., Petersen, K. (2008). Public interest or public meddling? Towards an objective framework for the regulation of assisted reproduction technologies. Hum Reprod 23: 716-728 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Magelssen, H., Melve, K.K., Skjaerven, R., Fossa, S.D. (2008). Parenthood probability and pregnancy outcome in patients with a cancer diagnosis during adolescence and young adulthood. Hum Reprod 23: 178-186 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Zhu, J. L., Obel, C., Hammer Bech, B., Olsen, J., Basso, O. (2007). Infertility, Infertility Treatment, and Fetal Growth Restriction. Obstet Gynecol 110: 1326-1334 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Bowdin, S., Allen, C., Kirby, G., Brueton, L., Afnan, M., Barratt, C., Kirkman-Brown, J., Harrison, R., Maher, E. R, Reardon, W. (2007). A survey of assisted reproductive technology births and imprinting disorders. Hum Reprod 22: 3237-3240 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Pinborg, A., Lidegaard, O., la Cour Freiesleben, N., Andersen, A. N. (2007). Vanishing twins: a predictor of small-for-gestational age in IVF singletons. Hum Reprod 22: 2707-2714 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Larcher, V. (2007). The health of children conceived by assisted reproduction technologies. Arch. Dis. Child. 92: 668-669 [Full text]  
• Reddy, U. M., Wapner, R. J., Rebar, R. W., Tasca, R. J. (2007). Infertility, Assisted Reproductive Technology, and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Executive Summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Workshop. Obstet Gynecol 109: 967-977 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• (2007). Other articles noted. Evid. Based Med. 12: 31-32 [Full text]  
• (2006). Infertility Is Associated with Increased Prevalence of Congenital Malformations. JWatch General 2006: 4-4 [Full text]  
• (2006). Congenital Malformations in Children of Infertile Couples. JWatch Women's Health 2006: 4-4 [Full text]  
• Park, S.-M., Mathur, R., Smith, G. C S (2006). Congenital anomalies after treatment for infertility.. BMJ 333: 665-666 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

STROBE recommends reporting absolute differences

Ellen O.M. Chan
bmj.com, 6 Dec 2006 [Full text]