BMJ  2006;333:626 (23 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.38932.806134.7C (published 15 September 2006)

Research

A randomised controlled trial of acupuncture care for persistent low back pain: cost effectiveness analysis

¹ School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, ² Foundation for Traditional Chinese Medicine, York YO24 1ET

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the cost effectiveness of acupuncture in the management of persistent non-specific low back pain.

Design Cost effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Setting Three private acupuncture clinics and 18 general practices in York, England.

Participants 241 adults aged 18-65 with non-specific low back pain of 4-52 weeks' duration.

Interventions Ten individualised acupuncture treatments over three months from acupuncturists trained in traditional Chinese medicine (n = 160) or usual care only (n = 81).

Main outcome measure Incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained over two years.

Results Total costs to the United Kingdom's health service during the two year study period were higher on average for the acupuncture group (£460; 673; $859) than for the usual care group (£345) because of the costs associated with initial treatment. The mean incremental health gain from acupuncture at 12 months was 0.012 QALYs (95% confidence interval -0.033 to 0.058) and at 24 months was 0.027 QALYs (-0.056 to 0.110), leading to a base case estimate of £4241 per QALY gained. This result was robust to sensitivity analysis. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed acupuncture to have a more than 90% chance of being cost effective at a £20 000 cost per QALY threshold.

Conclusion A short course of traditional acupuncture for persistent non-specific low back pain in primary care confers a modest health benefit for minor extra cost to the NHS compared with usual care. Acupuncture care for low back pain seems to be cost effective in the longer term.

Trial registration ISRCTN80764175 [controlled-trials.com] .

Related Articles

... and seems to be cost effective in the long term
BMJ 2006 333: 0. [Full Text]

Acupuncture in mainstream health care

David Wonderling
BMJ 2006 333: 611-612. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: cost effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care

UK BEAM Trial Team
BMJ 2004 329: 1381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Randomised controlled trial of physiotherapy compared with advice for low back pain

Helen Frost, Sarah E Lamb, Helen A Doll, Patricia Taffe Carver, and Sarah Stewart-Brown
BMJ 2004 329: 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Cost effectiveness analysis of a randomised trial of acupuncture for chronic headache in primary care

David Wonderling, Andrew J Vickers, Richard Grieve, and Rob McCarney
BMJ 2004 328: 747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

How should cost data in pragmatic randomised trials be analysed?

Simon G Thompson and Julie A Barber
BMJ 2000 320: 1197-1200. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• (2006). Acupuncture for Low Back Pain?. JWatch General 2006: 4-4 [Full text]  
• Wonderling, D. (2006). Acupuncture in mainstream health care. BMJ 333: 611-612 [Full text]  
• Thomas, K J, MacPherson, H, Thorpe, L, Brazier, J, Fitter, M, Campbell, M J, Roman, M, Walters, S J, Nicholl, J (2006). Randomised controlled trial of a short course of traditional acupuncture compared with usual care for persistent non-specific low back pain. BMJ 333: 623- [Abstract] [Full text]