BMJ  2006;333:623 (23 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.38878.907361.7C (published 15 September 2006)

Research

Randomised controlled trial of a short course of traditional acupuncture compared with usual care for persistent non-specific low back pain

¹ School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, ² Foundation for Traditional Chinese Medicine, York YO24 1ET, ³ Selby and York Primary Care Trust, York

Abstract

Objective To determine whether a short course of traditional acupuncture improves longer term outcomes for patients with persistent non-specific low back pain in primary care.

Design Pragmatic, open, randomised controlled trial.

Setting Three private acupuncture clinics and 18 general practices in York, England.

Participants 241 adults aged 18-65 with non-specific low back pain of 4-52 weeks' duration.

Interventions 10 individualised acupuncture treatments from one of six qualified acupuncturists (160 patients) or usual care only (81 patients).

Main outcome measures The primary outcome was SF-36 bodily pain, measured at 12 and 24 months. Other outcomes included reported use of analgesics, scores on the Oswestry pain disability index, safety, and patient satisfaction.

Results 39 general practitioners referred 289 patients of whom 241 were randomised. At 12 months average SF-36 pain scores increased by 33.2 to 64.0 in the acupuncture group and by 27.9 to 58.3 in the control group. Adjusting for baseline score and for any clustering by acupuncturist, the estimated intervention effect was 5.6 points (95% confidence interval -0.2 to 11.4) at 12 months (n = 213) and 8.0 points (2.8 to 13.2) at 24 months (n = 182). The magnitude of the difference between the groups was about 10%-15% of the final pain score in the control group. Functional disability was not improved. No serious or life threatening events were reported.

Conclusions Weak evidence was found of an effect of acupuncture on persistent non-specific low back pain at 12 months, but stronger evidence of a small benefit at 24 months. Referral to a qualified traditional acupuncturist for a short course of treatment seems safe and acceptable to patients with low back pain.

Trial registration ISRCTN80764175 [controlled-trials.com] .

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Acupuncture may help in non-specific low back pain...
BMJ 2006 333: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

Acupuncture in mainstream health care

David Wonderling
BMJ 2006 333: 611-612. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Clustering by health professional in individually randomised trials

Katherine J Lee and Simon G Thompson
BMJ 2005 330: 142-144. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Back pain and physiotherapy

Domhnall MacAuley
BMJ 2004 329: 694-695. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

The York acupuncture safety study: prospective survey of 34 000 treatments by traditional acupuncturists

Hugh MacPherson, Kate Thomas, Stephen Walters, and Mike Fitter
BMJ 2001 323: 486-487. [Full Text] [PDF]

Related external webpages:

NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Chou, R., Huffman, L. H. (2007). Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. ANN INTERN MED 147: 492-504 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Schott, G. D. (2007). Pain past, present and future: the unhappy paradox of scientific advances and therapeutic standstill. Brain 130: 1704-1708 [Full text]  
• (2006). Acupuncture for Low Back Pain?. JWatch General 2006: 4-4 [Full text]  
• Wonderling, D. (2006). Acupuncture in mainstream health care. BMJ 333: 611-612 [Full text]  
• Ratcliffe, J, Thomas, K J, MacPherson, H, Brazier, J (2006). A randomised controlled trial of acupuncture care for persistent low back pain: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ 333: 626- [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Alternative must be scientifically brought into mainstream

Rajan TD
bmj.com, 17 Sep 2006 [Full text]

Evidence and belief

David Colquhoun
bmj.com, 18 Sep 2006 [Full text]

Non-traditional acupuncture is quicker and equally effective

Anthony Campbell
bmj.com, 18 Sep 2006 [Full text]

Re: Evidence and belief

Rajan TD
bmj.com, 19 Sep 2006 [Full text]

The importance of previous treatment history

Rizaldy Pinzon
bmj.com, 22 Sep 2006 [Full text]

Re: Non-traditional acupuncture is quicker and equally effective

Marcus V Ferreira
bmj.com, 22 Sep 2006 [Full text]

Re: Re: Evidence and belief in ancient medicines

nicholas D. moore
bmj.com, 23 Sep 2006 [Full text]

91% would try it again.

Richard L Davies
bmj.com, 24 Sep 2006 [Full text]

Evidence of benefit or bereft of evidence?

Alfred P J Lake
bmj.com, 27 Sep 2006 [Full text]

Acupuncture or tree-hugging?

Edzard Ernst
bmj.com, 28 Sep 2006 [Full text]

Re: Evidence of benefit or bereft of evidence?

Richard Bartley
bmj.com, 28 Sep 2006 [Full text]

Re: Evidence of benefit or bereft of evidence?

Mark C Atkins
bmj.com, 29 Sep 2006 [Full text]

Re: Acupuncture or tree-hugging?

Richard Bartley
bmj.com, 30 Sep 2006 [Full text]

Back Pain: holistic strategy or monotherapy?

Abdul-Ghaaliq Lalkhen, et al.
bmj.com, 30 Sep 2006 [Full text]

Let's look at the facts

David Colquhoun
bmj.com, 29 Sep 2006 [Full text]

Contribution of “traditional acupuncture” may be overstated

Howard H Moffet
bmj.com, 3 Oct 2006 [Full text]

Acupuncture: exact treatment effect yet to be determined

Michael Grevitt
bmj.com, 23 Oct 2006 [Full text]

Evidence or Desire?

Marieke J. Gieteling, et al.
bmj.com, 25 Oct 2006 [Full text]

Report from BMJ post publication review meeting

Trish Groves
bmj.com, 24 Jul 2007 [Full text]