Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:469 (2 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.38918.659120.4F (published 8 August 2006)
Anders Norlund, health economist3, Lars-Åke Marké, health economist3, Jean-Luc af Geijerstam, researcher1, Sven Oredsson, head of emergency department2, Mona Britton, senior medical adviser3, OCTOPUS Study
1 Department of Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden, 2 Emergency Department, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden, 3 Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden
Correspondence to: J-L af Geijerstam jean-luc.af.geijerstam{at}ki.se
Objective To compare the costs of immediate computed tomography during triage for admission with those of observation in hospital in patients with mild head injury.
Design Prospective cost effectiveness analysis within a multicentre, pragmatic randomised trial.
Setting 39 acute hospitals in Sweden
Participants 2602 patients (aged
6) with mild head injury.
Interventions Immediate computed tomography or admission for observation.
Main outcome measures Direct and indirect costs related to the mild head injury during the acute and three month follow-up period.
Results Outcome after three months was similar for both strategies (non-significantly in favour of computed tomography). For the acute stage and complications, the cost was 461 euros (£314, $582) per patient in the computed tomography group and 677 euros (£462, $854) in the observation group; an average of 32% less in the computed tomography group (216 euros, 95% confidence interval -272 to -164; P < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis showed that computed tomography was the most cost effective strategy under a broad range of assumptions. After three months, total costs were 718 euros and 914 euros per patientthat is, 196 euros less in the computed tomography group (- 281 to - 114; P < 0.001). The lower cost of the computed tomography strategy at the acute stage thus remained unchanged during follow-up.
Conclusion Patients with mild head injury attending an emergency department can be managed more cost effectively with computed tomography rather than admission for observation in hospital.
Trial registration ISRCTN81464462 [controlled-trials.com] .
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses
UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care