BMJ  2006;333:327 (12 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.38870.657917.AE (published 30 June 2006)

Research

Case finding for patients at risk of readmission to hospital: development of algorithm to identify high risk patients

John Billings, professor1, Jennifer Dixon, director of policy2, Tod Mijanovich, research scientist1, David Wennberg, president and chief operating officer3

1 Centre for Health and Public Service Research, New York University, 295 Lafayette St, New York, NY 10012, USA, 2 King's Fund, London W1G 0AN, 3 Health Dialog Analytic Solutions, Health Dialog Corporate Headquarters, SixtyState Street, Suite 1100, Boston, MA 02109, USA

Correspondence to: John Billings john.billings{at}nyu.edu

Abstract

Objective To develop a method of identifying patients at high risk of readmission to hospital in the next 12 months for practical use by primary care trusts and general practices in the NHS in England.

Data sources Data from hospital episode statistics showing all admissions in NHS trusts in England over five years, 1999-2000 to 2003-4; data from the 2001 census for England.

Population All residents in England admitted to hospital in the previous four years with a subset of "reference" conditions for which improved management may help to prevent future admissions.

Design Multivariate statistical analysis of routinely collected data to develop an algorithm to predict patients at highest risk of readmission in the next 12 months. The algorithm was developed by using a 10% sample of hospital episode statistics data for all of England for the period indicated. The coefficients for 21 most powerful (and statistically significant) variables were then applied against a second 10% test sample to validate the findings of the algorithm from the first sample.

Results The key factors predicting subsequent admission included age, sex, ethnicity, number of previous admissions, and clinical condition. The algorithm produces a risk score (from 0 to 100) for each patient admitted with a reference condition. At a risk score threshold of 50, the algorithm identified 54.3% of patients admitted with a reference condition who would have an admission in the next 12 months; 34.7% of patients were "flagged" incorrectly (they would not have a subsequent admission). At risk score threshold levels of 70 and 80, the rate of incorrectly "flagged" patients dropped to 22.6% and 15.7%, but the algorithm found a lower percentage of patients who would be readmitted. The algorithm is made freely available to primary care trusts via a website.

Conclusions A method of predicting individual patients at highest risk of readmission to hospital in the next 12 months has been developed, which has a reasonable level of sensitivity and specificity. Using various assumptions a "business case" has been modelled to demonstrate to primary care trusts and practices the potential costs and impact of an intervention using the algorithm to reduce hospital admissions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Impact of case management (Evercare) on frail elderly patients: controlled before and after analysis of quantitative outcome data
Hugh Gravelle, Mark Dusheiko, Rod Sheaff, Penny Sargent, Ruth Boaden, Susan Pickard, Stuart Parker, and Martin Roland
BMJ 2007 334: 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Algorithm estimates risk of hospital readmission
BMJ 2006 333: 0. [Full Text]

Follow up of people aged 65 and over with a history of emergency admissions: analysis of routine admission data
Martin Roland, Mark Dusheiko, Hugh Gravelle, and Stuart Parker
BMJ 2005 330: 289-292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Sheaff, R., Boaden, R., Sargent, P., Pickard, S., Gravelle, H., Parker, S., Roland, M. (2009). Impacts of case management for frail elderly people: a qualitative study. J Health Serv Res Policy 14: 88-95 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Lewis, R., Smith, J., Harrison, A. (2009). From quasi-market to market in the National Health Service in England: what does this mean for the purchasing of health services?. J Health Serv Res Policy 14: 44-51 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Ham, C. (2009). Chronic Care In The English National Health Service: Progress And Challenges. Health Aff (Millwood) 28: 190-201 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Feudtner, C., Levin, J. E., Srivastava, R., Goodman, D. M., Slonim, A. D., Sharma, V., Shah, S. S., Pati, S., Fargason, C. Jr, Hall, M. (2009). How Well Can Hospital Readmission Be Predicted in a Cohort of Hospitalized Children? A Retrospective, Multicenter Study. Pediatrics 123: 286-293 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Donnan, P. T., Dorward, D. W. T., Mutch, B., Morris, A. D. (2008). Development and Validation of a Model for Predicting Emergency Admissions Over the Next Year (PEONY): A UK Historical Cohort Study. Arch Intern Med 168: 1416-1422 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Oliver, D. (2008). Falls risk-prediction tools for hospital inpatients. Time to put them to bed?. Age Ageing 37: 248-250 [Full text]  
  • Billings, J., Mijanovich, T. (2007). Improving The Management Of Care For High-Cost Medicaid Patients. Health Aff (Millwood) 26: 1643-1654 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Dixon, J., Chantler, C., Billings, J. (2007). Competition on Outcomes and Physician Leadership Are Not Enough to Reform Health Care. JAMA 298: 1445-1447 [Full text]  
  • Dixon, J. (2007). Critical Essay: Improving management of chronic illness in the National Health Service: better incentives are the key. Chronic Illness 3: 181-193  
  • Jacobs, S., Challis, D. (2007). Assessing the impact of care management in the community: associations between key organisational components and service outcomes. Age Ageing 36: 336-339 [Full text]  
  • Gravelle, H., Dusheiko, M., Sheaff, R., Sargent, P., Boaden, R., Pickard, S., Parker, S., Roland, M. (2007). Impact of case management (Evercare) on frail elderly patients: controlled before and after analysis of quantitative outcome data. BMJ 334: 31-31 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Readmissions to hospital
Iris González-Morales, et al.
bmj.com, 13 Aug 2006 [Full text]
The PARR tool is a huge step forward.
Kelechi E Nnoaham
bmj.com, 16 Aug 2006 [Full text]
Reducing hospital readmission rates
Stuart G Parker
bmj.com, 19 Aug 2006 [Full text]
Implications of prediction
Michael Tremblay
bmj.com, 30 Aug 2006 [Full text]



Doc2Doc Vacancy
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ