BMJ  2006;333:171 (22 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.38888.588519.55 (published 27 June 2006)

Research

Improving women's experience during speculum examinations at routine gynaecological visits: randomised clinical trial

¹ Department of Family and Community Medicine, Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, GA 30905, USA, ² Mathematics and Computer Science Department, Augusta State University, Augusta, GA 30904, USA

Abstract

Objectives To determine if a standardised method of leg positioning without stirrups reduces the physical discomfort and sense of vulnerability and increases the sense of control among women undergoing speculum examination as part of a routine gynaecological examination.

Design Randomised clinical trial.

Setting Family medicine outpatient clinic.

Patients 197 adult women undergoing routine gynaecological examination and cervical smear.

Intervention Examination with or without stirrups.

Main outcome measures Women's perceived levels of physical discomfort, sense of vulnerability, and sense of control during the examination, measured on 100 mm visual analogue scales.

Results Women undergoing examination without stirrups had a reduction in mean sense of vulnerability from 23.6 to 13.1 (95% confidence interval of the difference - 16.6 to - 4.4). Mean physical discomfort was reduced from 30.4 to 17.2 (- 19.7 to - 6.8). There was no significant reduction in sense of loss of control.

Conclusion Women should be able to have gynaecological examinations without using stirrups to reduce the stress associated with speculum examinations.

Trial registration US Army Central Investigation Regulatory Office. Trial No DDEAMC 05-11.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Why do poor outcomes persist in diabetic pregnancy?

Tim Cundy
BMJ 2006 333: 304. [Extract] [Full Text]

Stirrups or no stirrups for routine speculum examinations?: Patient comfort is secondary to cervical smear quality...

Anne Spaar and Milo A Puhan
BMJ 2006 333: 304-305. [Extract] [Full Text]

Stirrups or no stirrups for routine speculum examinations?: ... but we do not need to do a trial of smear quality

James A Dickinson
BMJ 2006 333: 305. [Extract] [Full Text]

Stirrups or no stirrups for routine speculum examinations?: Patient's perspective

Rosemary Slosek
BMJ 2006 333: 305. [Extract] [Full Text]

Women prefer speculum examinations without stirrups
BMJ 2006 333: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

Vaginal speculum examinations without stirrups

Wendy Brooks Barr
BMJ 2006 333: 158-159. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Seehusen, D. A., Richman, S. M., Kahwati, L. C., Edelman, A., Anderson, J., Tegtmeyer, K. (2007). Pelvic Examination. NEJM 357: 1778-1779 [Full text]  
• (2006). Other articles noted. Evid. Based Med. 11: 191-192 [Full text]  
• (2006). Stirrups: Because We Have Always Done It That Way?. JWatch Women's Health 2006: 1-1 [Full text]  
• (2006). Women Prefer Pelvic Exams Without Stirrups. JWatch Emergency Med. 2006: 5-5 [Full text]  
• Dickinson, J. A (2006). Stirrups or no stirrups for routine speculum examinations? ...but we do not need to do a trial of smear quality.. BMJ 333: 305-305 [Full text]  
• Cundy, T. (2006). Why do poor outcomes persist in diabetic pregnancy?. BMJ 333: 304-304 [Full text]  
• Spaar, A., Puhan, M. A (2006). Stirrups or no stirrups for routine speculum examinations? Patient comfort is secondary to cervical smear quality.... BMJ 333: 304-305 [Full text]  
• Slosek, R. (2006). Stirrups or no stirrups for routine speculum examinations? Patient's perspective.. BMJ 333: 305-305 [Full text]  
• Barr, W. B. (2006). Vaginal speculum examinations without stirrups. BMJ 333: 158-159 [Full text]  
• Oakeshott, P., Hay, P. (2006). Best practice in primary care. BMJ 333: 173-174 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Patient comfort important but secondary to cervical smear quality

Anne Spaar, et al.
bmj.com, 11 Jul 2006 [Full text]

Remember the individual

Jan M Perkins
bmj.com, 21 Jul 2006 [Full text]

Re: RCTs for 'non-inferiority'

Anil Sharma
bmj.com, 21 Jul 2006 [Full text]

We do not need to do a trail of smear quality

James A Dickinson
bmj.com, 21 Jul 2006 [Full text]

Pelvic Examination sans stirrups

Sidha Sambandan
bmj.com, 21 Jul 2006 [Full text]

Womens experiences during speculum examinations

Fenella Lemonsky
bmj.com, 21 Jul 2006 [Full text]

semi-seated position is even better

Susan Levenstein, et al.
bmj.com, 22 Jul 2006 [Full text]

A more caring approach might do wonders.

Jeevan P Marasinghe, et al.
bmj.com, 25 Jul 2006 [Full text]

Patient's perspective: US and UK

Rosemary Slosek
bmj.com, 25 Jul 2006 [Full text]

What is wrong with the left lateral position

Francis C. Rutter
bmj.com, 26 Jul 2006 [Full text]

Patient`s Choice

Mercy E Ochuko-Emore
bmj.com, 26 Jul 2006 [Full text]

What's in a name?

J. Michael Szul
bmj.com, 26 Jul 2006 [Full text]

Stirrups, schmirrups

Martin Talbot
bmj.com, 29 Jul 2006 [Full text]

Confounding variables not taken into account

Babatunde A. Gbolade
bmj.com, 2 Aug 2006 [Full text]

Race and Gender of Providers

Dean A. Seehusen
bmj.com, 3 Aug 2006 [Full text]

A modesty curtain

Roger H Armour
bmj.com, 7 Aug 2006 [Full text]

Re: What is wrong with the left lateral position

David P B Pound
bmj.com, 7 Aug 2006 [Full text]

Improving women's experience during speculum examinations at routine gynaecological visits: randomised clinical trial

Nazar R DESSOUKI
bmj.com, 8 Aug 2006 [Full text]

Re: A modesty curtain

Nazar R DESSOUKI
bmj.com, 8 Aug 2006 [Full text]

Positioning for gynecological exams

Mary E Crowther
bmj.com, 14 Aug 2006 [Full text]

putting women in control

Céline Lemay
bmj.com, 23 Sep 2006 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>