BMJ  2006;332:1413 (17 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.38849.478299.7C (published 1 June 2006)

Research

Randomised, controlled trial of alternating pressure mattresses compared with alternating pressure overlays for the prevention of pressure ulcers: PRESSURE (pressure relieving support surfaces) trial

¹ Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, ² Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, ³ Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD, ⁴ School of Healthcare Studies, University of Leeds

Abstract

Objective To compare whether differences exist between alternating pressure overlays and alternating pressure mattresses in the development of new pressure ulcers, healing of existing pressure ulcers, and patient acceptability.

Design Pragmatic, open, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Setting 11 hospitals in six NHS trusts.

Participants 1972 people admitted to hospital as acute or elective patients.

Interventions Participants were randomised to an alternating pressure mattress (n = 982) or an alternating pressure overlay (n = 990).

Main outcome measures The proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer of grade 2 or worse; time to development of new pressure ulcers; proportions of participants developing a new ulcer within 30 days; healing of existing pressure ulcers; and patient acceptability.

Results Intention to treat analysis found no difference in the proportions of participants developing a new pressure ulcer of grade 2 or worse (10.7% overlay patients, 10.3% mattress patients; difference 0.4%, 95% confidence interval - 2.3% to 3.1%, P = 0.75). More overlay patients requested change owing to dissatisfaction (23.3%) than mattress patients (18.9%, P = 0.02).

Conclusion No difference was found between alternating pressure mattresses and alternating pressure overlays in the proportion of people who develop a pressure ulcer.

Trial registration ISRCTN 78646179

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Alternating pressure mattresses are more cost effective than overlays
BMJ 2006 332: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

Overlays or mattresses to prevent pressure sores?

Luke Vale and David W Noble
BMJ 2006 332: 1401-1402. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Related external webpages:

NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Gunningberg, L., Stotts, N. A. (2008). Tracking quality over time: what do pressure ulcer data show?. Int J Qual Health Care 20: 246-253 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Soares, M., Dumville, J. C (2008). Economic evaluation of healthcare technologies using primary research. Evid. Based Nurs. 11: 67-71 [Full text]  
• Hoskins, A. (2007). Similar proportions of patients developed pressure ulcers on alternating pressure overlays and alternating pressure mattresses. Evid. Based Nurs. 10: 22-22 [Full text]  
• Reddy, M., Gill, S. S., Rochon, P. A. (2006). Preventing pressure ulcers: a systematic review.. JAMA 296: 974-984 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• (2006). Preventing Pressure Ulcers in Hospitalized Patients. JWatch General 2006: 6-6 [Full text]  
• Vale, L., Noble, D. W (2006). Overlays or mattresses to prevent pressure sores?. BMJ 332: 1401-1402 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Preventing pressure sores in ICU

Olivier Pourrat, et al.
bmj.com, 24 Jun 2006 [Full text]

PRESSURE trial - further information

Tom Walley
bmj.com, 29 Jun 2006 [Full text]