BMJ  2006;332:1306-1311 (3 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.38849.440914.AE (published 16 May 2006)

Research

Impact of specialty of admitting physician and type of hospital on care and outcome for myocardial infarction in England and Wales during 2004-5: observational study

¹ Northampton General Hospital, Northampton, NN1 5BD, ² Singleton Hospital, Swansea, Wales, ³ Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit, Royal College of Physicians of London, London NW1 4LE

Abstract

Objective To examine process of care and outcome for patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction to hospitals in England and Wales in relation to type of consultant care and type of hospital.

Design Observational study of 88 782 patients admitted with myocardial infarction during 2004-5, using records from the national audit of myocardial infarction project (MINAP) database.

Outcome measures Use of reperfusion treatment and secondary prevention drugs, use of angiography, and 90 day mortality of patients admitted under the care of cardiologists and non-cardiologists in hospitals with and without facilities for coronary intervention.

Findings 36% of patients were admitted under the care of a cardiologist and 20% to a hospital with coronary interventional facilities. Patients admitted under cardiologists had fewer comorbidities than other patients and were more likely to have reperfusion treatment (12 266/14 433 (85%) v 13 682/17 064 (80%)) and appropriate secondary prevention drugs. Overall, 27 431/79 374 (35%) of patients had angiography. Relatively more patients admitted to interventional hospitals (8167/14 661; 56%) than to other hospitals had angiography (19 264/64 713; 30%). The adjusted risk of death by 90 days for patients treated in interventional compared with non-interventional hospitals was 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.06). The adjusted risk of death at 90 days for patients admitted under cardiologists compared with non-cardiologists was 0.86 (0.81 to 0.91).

Conclusions Patients cared for by cardiologists had less comorbidity than other patients. They were more likely to receive proved treatments and angiography, and they had a lower adjusted 90 day mortality. Large differences existed in the use of angiography between interventional and non-interventional hospitals. These findings show wide variations in the management and outcome of patients with myocardial infarction in England and Wales.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Data sources and performance measurement

Stephen Singleton
BMJ 2007 335: 730. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Cardiologists provide best care for patients with MI
BMJ 2006 332: 0. [Full Text]

Intelligent analysis

Jane Smith
BMJ 2006 332: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Access to catheterisation facilities in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome: multinational registry study

Frans Van de Werf, Joel M Gore, Álvaro Avezum, Dietrich C Gulba, Shaun G Goodman, Andrzej Budaj, David Brieger, Kami White, Keith A A Fox, Kim A Eagle, Brian M Kennelly for the GRACE Investigators
BMJ 2005 330: 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Bates, E. R., Nallamothu, B. K. (2008). Commentary: The Role of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 118: 567-573 [Full text]  
• Singleton, S. (2007). Data sources and performance measurement. BMJ 335: 730-730 [Full text]  
• Wong, P, Ramsewak, A, Murray, S, Robinson, A, Robinson, D, Rodrigues, E (2007). Effects of comorbidity and hospital care on 6-month mortality in patients with elevated cardiac troponin T. Postgrad. Med. J. 83: 332-337 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Khavandi, A, Walker, P R (2007). Acute coronary syndrome. BMJ 334: 647-648 [Full text]  
• Fox, K. A.A. (2006). Registries and surveys in acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J 27: 2260-2262 [Full text]  
• Malik, I. (2006). JournalScan. Heart 92: 1183-1184 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Poorer outcome from MI in patients looked after by Non cardiologists could be due to unfavourable factors

Sujoy Maitra
bmj.com, 3 Jun 2006 [Full text]

Impact of speciality in gastrointestinal bleeding.

Neeraj Bhala
bmj.com, 6 Jun 2006 [Full text]

The truth is out there

Mark J Garton
bmj.com, 9 Jun 2006 [Full text]