BMJ  2006;332:1061-1064 (6 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.38768.420139.80 (published 17 March 2006)

Research

Origin and funding of the most frequently cited papers in medicine: database analysis

Nikolaos A Patsopoulos, research associate1, John P A Ioannidis, professor1, Apostolos A Analatos, medical student2

1 Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece, 2 University of Thessaly School of Medicine, Larissa, Greece

Correspondence to: J P A Ioannidis jioannid{at}cc.uoi.gr

Abstract

Objective To evaluate changes in the role of academics and the sources of funding for the medical research cited most frequently over the past decade.

Design Database analysis.

Data sources Web of Knowledge database.

Methods For each year from 1994 to 2003, articles in the domain of clinical medicine that had been cited most often by the end of 2004 were identified. Changes in authors' affiliations and funding sources were evaluated.

Results Of the 289 frequently cited articles, most had at least one author with a university (76%) or hospital (57%) affiliation, and the proportion of articles with each type of affiliation was constant over time. Government or public funding was most common (60% of articles), followed by industry (36%). The proportion of most frequently cited articles funded by industry increased over time (odds ratio 1.17 per year, P = 0.001) and was equal to the proportion funded by government or public sources by 2001. 65 of the 77 most cited randomised controlled trials received funding from industry, and the proportion increased significantly over time (odds ratio 1.59 per year, P = 0.003). 18 of the 32 most cited trials published after 1999 were funded by industry alone.

Conclusion Academic affiliations remain prominent among the authors of the most frequently cited medical research. Such research is increasingly funded by industry, often exclusively so. Academics may be losing control of the clinical research agenda.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Academics may be losing control of clinical research
BMJ 2006 332: 0. [Full Text]

Who cares about academic medicine?
Jocalyn Clark and Peter Tugwell
BMJ 2004 329: 751-752. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

ICRAM (the International Campaign to Revitalise Academic Medicine): agenda setting
International Working Party to Promote and Revitalise Academic Medicine
BMJ 2004 329: 787-789. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Academic medicine: the evidence base
International Working Party to Promote and Revitalise Academic Medicine
BMJ 2004 329: 789-792. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review
Joel Lexchin, Lisa A Bero, Benjamin Djulbegovic, and Otavio Clark
BMJ 2003 326: 1167-1170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Relation between burden of disease and randomised evidence in sub-Saharan Africa: survey of research
Petros Isaakidis, George H Swingler, Elizabeth Pienaar, Jimmy Volmink, and John P A Ioannidis
BMJ 2002 324: 702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Duchenne muscular dystrophy: relevant paper was not included
Robert A Smith and Robert S Phillips
BMJ 2001 323: 1253. [Extract] [Full Text]

Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved?
Eugene Garfield
BMJ 1996 313: 411-413. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kulkarni, A. V., Aziz, B., Shams, I., Busse, J. W. (2009). Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals. JAMA 302: 1092-1096 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Sismondo, S. (2009). Ghosts in the machine: publication planning in the medical sciences.. Social Studies of Science 39: 171-198 [Abstract]  
  • Conen, D., Torres, J., Ridker, P. M (2008). Differential Citation Rates of Major Cardiovascular Clinical Trials According to Source of Funding: A Survey From 2000 to 2005. Circulation 118: 1321-1327 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Meador, K. J., Chadwick, D. (2007). How skeptical should we be about industry-sponsored studies?. Neurology 68: 1238-1238 [Full text]  
  • Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2007). Is Molecular Profiling Ready for Use in Clinical Decision Making?. The Oncologist 12: 301-311 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Lumbreras, B., Hernandez-Aguado, I. (2007). Sharing hypotheses and ideas in public health research: contributing to the research agenda. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 61: 2-4 [Full text]  
  • Delaney, B. (2006). Is society losing control of the medical research agenda?. BMJ 332: 1063-1064 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Incomplete reasoning
James Michelson
bmj.com, 6 May 2006 [Full text]
Re: Incomplete reasoning
Nikolaos A Patsopoulos, et al.
bmj.com, 26 May 2006 [Full text]
The most frequently cited scientific paper in health science?
Flemming M Nilsson
bmj.com, 12 Nov 2006 [Full text]
On citing scientific papers properly
Reinhard Wentz
bmj.com, 13 Nov 2006 [Full text]
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ