BMJ  2006;332:1005-1009 (29 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.38768.590174.55 (published 16 March 2006)

Research

Admissions processes for five year medical courses at English schools: review

¹ Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, ² Health Impact Assessment Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, ³ Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, ⁴ School of Education, University of Birmingham

Abstract

Objective To describe the current methods used by English medical schools to identify prospective medical students for admission to the five year degree course.

Design Review study including documentary analysis and interviews with admissions tutors.

Setting All schools (n = 22) participating in the national expansion of medical schools programme in England.

Results Though there is some commonality across schools with regard to the criteria used to select future students (academic ability coupled with a "well rounded" personality demonstrated by motivation for medicine, extracurricular interests, and experience of team working and leadership skills) the processes used vary substantially. Some schools do not interview; some shortlist for interview only on predicted academic performance while those that shortlist on a wider range of non-academic criteria use various techniques and tools to do so. Some schools use information presented in the candidate's personal statement and referee's report while others ignore this because of concerns over bias. A few schools seek additional information from supplementary questionnaires filled in by the candidates. Once students are shortlisted, interviews vary in terms of length, panel composition, structure, content, and scoring methods.

Conclusion The stated criteria for admission to medical school show commonality. Universities differ greatly, however, in how they apply these criteria and in the methods used to select students. Different approaches to admissions should be developed and tested.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Hudson, N. P. H., Rhind, S. M., Moore, L. J., Dawson, S., Kilyon, M., Braithwaite, K., Wason, J., Mellanby, R. J. (2009). Admissions processes at the seven United Kingdom veterinary schools: a review. Vet Rec. 164: 583-587 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Breit, S. M, Kunzel, W. (2007). Effect of the Recently Established Admissions Procedure on Success in the First-Year Exams at the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria. jvme 34: 335-339 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Kunzel, W., Breit, S. M. (2007). Admissions Procedures at the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria. jvme 34: 639-644 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Powis, D. A, Bore, M., Munro, D. (2006). Selecting medical students: evidence based admissions procedures for medical students are being tested.. BMJ 332: 1156-1156 [Full text]  
• Norman, G. R (2006). Standardising the process versus improving the methods. BMJ 332: 1008-1009 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Evidence-Based Admissions Procedures for Medical Students

David A Powis, et al.
bmj.com, 22 Mar 2006 [Full text]

Re: Evidence-Based Admissions Procedures for Medical Students

William Watson
bmj.com, 23 Mar 2006 [Full text]

More medicine by numbers

Kunal Kulkarni
bmj.com, 24 Mar 2006 [Full text]

To Whom Should We Admit?

Simon P Lammy
bmj.com, 6 May 2006 [Full text]