BMJ  2006;332:1005-1009 (29 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.38768.590174.55 (published 16 March 2006)

Research

Admissions processes for five year medical courses at English schools: review

Jayne Parry, senior clinical lecturer1, Jonathan Mathers, deputy director2, Andrew Stevens, professor of public health1, Amanda Parsons, research assistant2, Richard Lilford, professor of clinical epidemiology1, Peter Spurgeon, professor of health services management3, Hywel Thomas, professor of economics of education4

1 Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, 2 Health Impact Assessment Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, 3 Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, 4 School of Education, University of Birmingham

Correspondence to: J Parry J.M.Parry.1{at}bham.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective To describe the current methods used by English medical schools to identify prospective medical students for admission to the five year degree course.

Design Review study including documentary analysis and interviews with admissions tutors.

Setting All schools (n = 22) participating in the national expansion of medical schools programme in England.

Results Though there is some commonality across schools with regard to the criteria used to select future students (academic ability coupled with a "well rounded" personality demonstrated by motivation for medicine, extracurricular interests, and experience of team working and leadership skills) the processes used vary substantially. Some schools do not interview; some shortlist for interview only on predicted academic performance while those that shortlist on a wider range of non-academic criteria use various techniques and tools to do so. Some schools use information presented in the candidate's personal statement and referee's report while others ignore this because of concerns over bias. A few schools seek additional information from supplementary questionnaires filled in by the candidates. Once students are shortlisted, interviews vary in terms of length, panel composition, structure, content, and scoring methods.

Conclusion The stated criteria for admission to medical school show commonality. Universities differ greatly, however, in how they apply these criteria and in the methods used to select students. Different approaches to admissions should be developed and tested.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Selecting medical students: Evidence based admissions procedures for medical students are being tested
David A Powis, Miles Bore, and Donald Munro
BMJ 2006 332: 1156. [Extract] [Full Text]

Do English medical schools need a single admissions process?
BMJ 2006 332: 0. [Full Text]

Intellectual aptitude tests and A levels for selecting UK school leaver entrants for medical school
I C McManus, David A Powis, Richard Wakeford, Eamonn Ferguson, David James, and Peter Richards
BMJ 2005 331: 555-559. [Full Text] [PDF]

The benefits of aptitude testing for selecting medical students
Sandra Nicholson
BMJ 2005 331: 559-560. [Full Text] [PDF]

A levels and intelligence as predictors of medical careers in UK doctors: 20 year prospective study
I C McManus, Eleni Smithers, Philippa Partridge, A Keeling, and Peter R Fleming
BMJ 2003 327: 139-142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Pilot study of the roles of personality, references, and personal statements in relation to performance over the five years of a medical degree • Commentary: How to derive causes from correlations in educational studies
Eamonn Ferguson, David James, Fiona O'Hehir, Andrea Sanders, and I C McManus
BMJ 2003 326: 429-432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Factors associated with success in medical school: systematic review of the literature
Eamonn Ferguson, David James, and Laura Madeley
BMJ 2002 324: 952-957. [Full Text] [PDF]

Factors affecting likelihood of applicants being offered a place in medical schools in the United Kingdom in 1996 and 1997: retrospective study • Commentary: League tables will help • Commentary: Some legal aspects arising from the study
I C McManus, Aneez Esmail, and Marie Demetriou
BMJ 1998 317: 1111-1117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Acceptance into medical school and racial discrimination
Aneez Esmail, Paul Nelson, Dawn Primarolo, and Tudor Toma
BMJ 1995 310: 501-502. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Hudson, N. P. H., Rhind, S. M., Moore, L. J., Dawson, S., Kilyon, M., Braithwaite, K., Wason, J., Mellanby, R. J. (2009). Admissions processes at the seven United Kingdom veterinary schools: a review. Vet Rec. 164: 583-587 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Breit, S. M, Kunzel, W. (2007). Effect of the Recently Established Admissions Procedure on Success in the First-Year Exams at the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria. jvme 34: 335-339 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Kunzel, W., Breit, S. M. (2007). Admissions Procedures at the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria. jvme 34: 639-644 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Powis, D. A, Bore, M., Munro, D. (2006). Selecting medical students: evidence based admissions procedures for medical students are being tested.. BMJ 332: 1156-1156 [Full text]  
  • Norman, G. R (2006). Standardising the process versus improving the methods. BMJ 332: 1008-1009 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Evidence-Based Admissions Procedures for Medical Students
David A Powis, et al.
bmj.com, 22 Mar 2006 [Full text]
Re: Evidence-Based Admissions Procedures for Medical Students
William Watson
bmj.com, 23 Mar 2006 [Full text]
More medicine by numbers
Kunal Kulkarni
bmj.com, 24 Mar 2006 [Full text]
To Whom Should We Admit?
Simon P Lammy
bmj.com, 6 May 2006 [Full text]
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ