BMJ  2006;332:942-948 (22 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.38807.571042.68 (published 5 April 2006)

Research

Effect of different forms of information produced for cancer patients on their use of the information, social support, and anxiety: randomised trial

R B Jones, professor of health informatics1, J Pearson, research assistant2, A J Cawsey, senior lecturer in computing3, D Bental, research fellow3, A Barrett, professor of oncology4, J White, consultant clinical psychologist5, C A White, Macmillan consultant in psychosocial oncology6, W H Gilmour, senior lecturer in medical statistics2

1 Faculty of Health and Social Work, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, 2 Public Health & Health Policy Section, Division of Community Based Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, 3 School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Heriot Watt University, Riccarton Campus, Edinburgh, 4 School of Medicine, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, 5 Greater Glasgow Primary Care NHS Trust, STEPS, Glasgow G42 8AT, 6 NHS Ayrshire and Arran, Ayrshire Central Hospital, Irvine KA12 8SS

Correspondence to: R Jones ray.jones{at}plymouth.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective To explore the hypothesis that different methods of selecting and printing information for cancer patients could improve emotional support by affecting interaction with others, and so lead to improved psychological wellbeing.

Design Randomised trial with eight groups (three factors, 2x2x2). Data collected at recruitment and three month follow-up.

Participants 400 patients starting radiotherapy, of whom 325 with breast or prostate cancer and complete anxiety and depression data were included in the analysis.

Interventions Printed booklets: half had only general information from CancerBACUP about each patient's cancer and half had personalised information from the patient's medical record plus selected general information; half were composed of information chosen interactively by the patient and half were produced automatically with a larger volume of material; and half had additional advice on anxiety management and half did not.

Main outcome measures Patients' views of the information, use of their booklets with others; change in reported social support; change in anxiety and depression.

Results The larger booklets produced automatically were more likely to be found useful and to tell patients something new and less likely to be seen as too limited than the booklets produced interactively, but they were also more likely to overwhelm some patients. Personalised booklets were more likely than general booklets to tell patients something new. There was no difference in patients' perceived understanding of their cancer by any of the intervention factors. Patients with personalised information were more likely to show their booklets to others and to think it helped in discussing their cancer or its treatment. There were no major differences in social support, anxiety, or depression by any intervention factors.

Conclusions Patients were more likely to show personalised information to their confidants than general information. Further research is needed into the effects of sharing information on patients' social support and anxiety.

Trial registration US Government Clinical Trials Database NCT00127465


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Effect of sex and gender on psychosocial aspects of prostate and breast cancer
Alexander Kiss and Siegfried Meryn
BMJ 2001 323: 1055-1058. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for cancer patients
Ray Jones, Janne Pearson, Sandra McGregor, Alison J Cawsey, Ann Barrett, Neil Craig, Jacqueline M Atkinson, W Harper Gilmour, and Jim McEwen
BMJ 1999 319: 1241-1247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Information needs of cancer patients in west Scotland: cross sectional survey of patients' views
Catherine Meredith, Paul Symonds, Lorraine Webster, Douglas Lamont, Elspeth Pyper, Charles R Gillis, and Lesley Fallowfield
BMJ 1996 313: 724-726. [Abstract] [Full Text]




Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ
Listen to the latest 

BMJ Interview