Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:815-820 (8 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.38773.518322.7C (published 16 March 2006)
Helen Killaspy, senior lecturer1, Paul Bebbington, professor1, Robert Blizard, statistician2, Sonia Johnson, senior lecturer1, Fiona Nolan, nursing research fellow3, Stephen Pilling, director of centre3, Michael King, professor1
1 Department of Mental Health Sciences, University College London, London NW3 2PF; Camden and Islington Mental Health and Social Care Trust, 2 Department of Mental Health Sciences, University College London, 3 Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, University College London
Correspondence to: H Killaspy h.killaspy{at}medsch.ucl.ac.uk
Objective To compare outcomes of care from assertive community treatment teams with care by community mental health teams for people with serious mental illnesses.
Design Non-blind randomised controlled trial.
Setting Two inner London boroughs.
Participants 251 men and women under the care of adult secondary mental health services with recent high use of inpatient care and difficulties engaging with community services.
Interventions Treatment from assertive community treatment team (127 participants) or continuation of care from community mental health team (124 participants).
Main outcome measures Primary outcome was inpatient bed use 18 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes included symptoms, social function, client satisfaction, and engagement with services.
Results No significant differences were found in inpatient bed use (median difference 1, 95% confidence interval -16 to 38) or in clinical or social outcomes for the two treatment groups. Clients who received care from the assertive community treatment team seemed better engaged (adapted homeless engagement acceptance schedule: difference in means 1.1, 1.0 to 1.9), and those who agreed to be interviewed were more satisfied with services (adapted client satisfaction questionnaire: difference in means 7.14, 0.9 to 13.4).
Conclusions Community mental health teams are able to support people with serious mental illnesses as effectively as assertive community treatment teams, but assertive community treatment may be better at engaging clients and may lead to greater satisfaction with services.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses