BMJ  2006;332:692-696 (25 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7543.692

Research

Effectiveness of educational interventions in improving detection and management of dementia in primary care: cluster randomised controlled study

Murna Downs, professor in dementia studies1, Stephen Turner, senior researcher2, Michelle Bryans, D Clin Psych student3, Jane Wilcock, research fellow4, John Keady, professor of admiral nursing5, Enid Levin, practice development manager6, Ronan O'Carroll, professor of psychology7, Kate Howie, statistical consultant and teaching fellow8, Steve Iliffe, reader in general practice4

1 Bradford Dementia Group, Division of Dementia Studies, School of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford BD5 0BB, 2 Dental Health Services Research Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, 3 Department of Psychiatry, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh, 4 Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, 5 School of Health Education and Community Studies, Northumbria University, Benton, Newcastle upon Tyne, 6 Social Care Institute for Excellence, London, 7 Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, 8 Department of Computing, Science, and Mathematics, University of Stirling

Correspondence to: M Downs m.downs{at}bradford.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective To test the effectiveness of educational interventions in improving detection rates and management of dementia in primary care.

Design Unblinded, cluster randomised, before and after controlled study.

Setting General practices in the United Kingdom (central Scotland and London) between 1999 and 2002.

Interventions Three educational interventions: an electronic tutorial carried on a CD Rom; decision support software built into the electronic medical record; and practice based workshops.

Participants 36 practices participated in the study. Eight practices were randomly assigned to the electronic tutorial; eight to decision support software; 10 to practice based workshops; and 10 to control. Electronic and manual searches yielded 450 valid and usable medical records.

Main outcome measures Rates of detection of dementia and the extent to which medical records showed evidence of improved concordance with guidelines regarding diagnosis and management.

Results Decision support software (P = 0.01) and practice based workshops (P = 0.01) both significantly improved rates of detection compared with control. There were no significant differences by intervention in the measures of concordance with guidelines.

Conclusions Decision support systems and practice based workshops are effective educational approaches in improving detection rates in dementia.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Benefits from detecting dementia are dubious
Laurie R Davis
BMJ 2006 332: 916. [Extract] [Full Text]

Education can improve GPs' detection of dementia
BMJ 2006 332: 0. [Full Text]

Improving the management of dementia
Elizabeth England
BMJ 2006 332: 681-682. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Effect of computerised evidence based guidelines on management of asthma and angina in adults in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial
Martin Eccles, Elaine McColl, Nick Steen, Nikki Rousseau, Jeremy Grimshaw, David Parkin, and Ian Purves
BMJ 2002 325: 941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

North of England evidence based guidelines development project: guideline for the primary care management of dementia
Martin Eccles, Julie Clarke, Moira Livingston, Nick Freemantle, and James Mason
BMJ 1998 317: 802-808. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Do clinical guidelines introduced with practice based education improve care of asthmatic and diabetic patients? A randomised controlled trial in general practices in east London
Gene Feder, Chris Griffiths, Clare Highton, Sandra Eldridge, Matthew Spence, and Lesley Southgate
BMJ 1995 311: 1473-1478. [Abstract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Fisher, C., Larner, A. (2007). Frequency and diagnostic utility of cognitive test instrument use by GPs prior to memory clinic referral. Fam Pract 24: 495-497 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Cahill, S. (2006). Educational workshops and decision support software increase detection of dementia in the elderly in primary care settings.. Evid. Based Ment. Health 9: 102-102 [Full text]  
  • Downs, M., Ariss, S. M.B., Grant, E., Keady, J., Turner, S., Bryans, M., Wilcock, J., Levin, E., O'carroll, R., Iliffe, S. (2006). Family carers' accounts of general practice contacts for their relatives with early signs of dementia. Dementia 5: 353-373 [Abstract]  
  • Davis, L. R (2006). Benefits from detecting dementia are dubious.. BMJ 332: 916-916 [Full text]  
  • England, E. (2006). Improving the management of dementia.. BMJ 332: 681-682 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Improving detection of dementia in primary care
Nilamadhab Kar
bmj.com, 26 Mar 2006 [Full text]
Dubious Benefits
laurie r davis
bmj.com, 27 Mar 2006 [Full text]
Accuracy of diagnosing dementia in general practice in Italy
Massimo Franceschi, et al.
bmj.com, 31 Mar 2006 [Full text]



Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ
Listen to the latest 

BMJ Interview