Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:692-696 (25 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7543.692
Murna Downs, professor in dementia studies1, Stephen Turner, senior researcher2, Michelle Bryans, D Clin Psych student3, Jane Wilcock, research fellow4, John Keady, professor of admiral nursing5, Enid Levin, practice development manager6, Ronan O'Carroll, professor of psychology7, Kate Howie, statistical consultant and teaching fellow8, Steve Iliffe, reader in general practice4
1 Bradford Dementia Group, Division of Dementia Studies, School of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford BD5 0BB, 2 Dental Health Services Research Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, 3 Department of Psychiatry, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh, 4 Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, 5 School of Health Education and Community Studies, Northumbria University, Benton, Newcastle upon Tyne, 6 Social Care Institute for Excellence, London, 7 Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, 8 Department of Computing, Science, and Mathematics, University of Stirling
Correspondence to: M Downs m.downs{at}bradford.ac.uk
Objective To test the effectiveness of educational interventions in improving detection rates and management of dementia in primary care.
Design Unblinded, cluster randomised, before and after controlled study.
Setting General practices in the United Kingdom (central Scotland and London) between 1999 and 2002.
Interventions Three educational interventions: an electronic tutorial carried on a CD Rom; decision support software built into the electronic medical record; and practice based workshops.
Participants 36 practices participated in the study. Eight practices were randomly assigned to the electronic tutorial; eight to decision support software; 10 to practice based workshops; and 10 to control. Electronic and manual searches yielded 450 valid and usable medical records.
Main outcome measures Rates of detection of dementia and the extent to which medical records showed evidence of improved concordance with guidelines regarding diagnosis and management.
Results Decision support software (P = 0.01) and practice based workshops (P = 0.01) both significantly improved rates of detection compared with control. There were no significant differences by intervention in the measures of concordance with guidelines.
Conclusions Decision support systems and practice based workshops are effective educational approaches in improving detection rates in dementia.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses