BMJ  2006;332:635-637 (18 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.38758.600116.AE (published 24 February 2006)

Research

Applicability to primary care of national clinical guidelines on blood pressure lowering for people with stroke: cross sectional study

¹ Department of Primary Care and General Practice, Primary Care, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT

Abstract

Objective To compare the characteristics of patients with cerebrovascular disease in primary care with those of the participants in the PROGRESS trial, on which national guidelines for blood pressure lowering are based.

Design Population based cross sectional survey of patients with confirmed stroke or transient ischaemic attack.

Setting Seven general practices in south Birmingham, England.

Participants All patients with a validated history of stroke (n = 413) or transient ischaemic attack (n = 107).

Main outcome measures Patient characteristics: age, sex, time since last cerebrovascular event, blood pressure, and whether receiving antihypertensive treatment.

Results Patients were 12 years older than the participants in PROGRESS and twice as likely to be women. The median time that had elapsed since their cerebrovascular event was two and a half years, compared with eight months in PROGRESS. The systolic blood pressure of 315 (61%) patients was over 140 mm Hg, and for 399 (77%) it was over 130 mm Hg. One hundred and forty seven (28%) patients were receiving a thiazide diuretic, and 136 (26%) were receiving an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor.

Conclusions Important differences exist between the PROGRESS trial participants and a typical primary care stroke population, which undermine the applicability of the trial's findings. Research in appropriate populations is urgently needed before the international guidelines are implemented in primary care.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Five year prognosis in patients with angina identified in primary care: incident cohort study

Brian S Buckley, Colin R Simpson, David J McLernon, Andrew W Murphy, and Philip C Hannaford
BMJ 2009 339: b3058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

How to formulate research recommendations

Polly Brown, Klara Brunnhuber, Kalipso Chalkidou, Iain Chalmers, Mike Clarke, Mark Fenton, Carol Forbes, Julie Glanville, Nicholas J Hicks, Janet Moody, Sara Twaddle, Hazim Timimi, and Pamela Young
BMJ 2006 333: 804-806. [Full Text] [PDF]

Blood pressure lowering in elderly patients with stroke

Elliot Epstein and Anil Kumar
BMJ 2006 332: 793-794. [Extract] [Full Text]

Guidelines on blood pressure after stroke may not apply to primary care
BMJ 2006 332: 0. [Full Text]

The ground or the goal posts?

Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2006 332: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

What sort of evidence do we need in primary care?

Sharon Mickan and Deborah Askew
BMJ 2006 332: 619-620. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

The PROGRESS trial three years later: time for a balanced report of effectiveness

Richard Wennberg and Camilla Zimmermann
BMJ 2004 329: 968-970. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Buckley, B. S, Simpson, C. R, McLernon, D. J, Murphy, A. W, Hannaford, P. C (2009). Five year prognosis in patients with angina identified in primary care: incident cohort study. BMJ 339: b3058-b3058 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Maasland, L., van Oostenbrugge, R. J., Franke, C. F., Scholte op Reimer, W. J.M., Koudstaal, P. J., Dippel, D. W.J., for the Netherlands Stroke Survey Investigators, (2009). Patients Enrolled in Large Randomized Clinical Trials of Antiplatelet Treatment for Prevention After Transient Ischemic Attack or Ischemic Stroke Are Not Representative of Patients in Clinical Practice: The Netherlands Stroke Survey. Stroke 40: 2662-2668 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Holtedahl, K. (2008). Research and practice combined--ideas for a life in general practice. Fam Pract 25: 132-136 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• McManus, R. J, Ryan, R., Jones, M., Wilson, S., Hobbs, F. R. (2008). How representative of primary care are research active practices? Cross-sectional survey. Fam Pract 25: 56-62 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Rudd, A. G., Hoffman, A., Down, C., Pearson, M., Lowe, D. (2007). Access to stroke care in England, Wales and Northern Ireland: the effect of age, gender and weekend admission. Age Ageing 36: 247-255 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Brown, P., Brunnhuber, K., Chalkidou, K., Chalmers, I., Clarke, M., Fenton, M., Forbes, C., Glanville, J., Hicks, N. J, Moody, J., Twaddle, S., Timimi, H., Young, P. (2006). How to formulate research recommendations.. BMJ 333: 804-806 [Full text]  
• (2006). CARPHOLOGY by Rajendra. PN 6: 268-268 [Full text]  
• Epstein, E., Kumar, A. (2006). Blood pressure lowering in elderly patients with stroke.. BMJ 332: 793-794 [Full text]  
• Mickan, S., Askew, D. (2006). What sort of evidence do we need in primary care?. BMJ 332: 619-620 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Stroke and the global public health challenge; the clock is ticking away…………….

George I. Varughese, et al.
bmj.com, 1 Mar 2006 [Full text]

Blood pressure lowering and stroke

Elliot Epstein, et al.
bmj.com, 20 Mar 2006 [Full text]

More research or different research?

Moyez Jiwa
bmj.com, 28 Mar 2006 [Full text]

National Stroke Guidance is applicable to primary care

Wayne Sunman
bmj.com, 7 Apr 2006 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more>>