Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:445-450 (25 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.38725.728472.BE (published 10 February 2006)
Joanna Tully, clinical research fellow1, Russell M Viner, consultant in adolescent medicine and endocrinology2, Pietro G Coen, statistician1, James M Stuart, consultant epidemiologist4, Maria Zambon, head of respiratory virus unit5, Catherine Peckham, professor of paediatric epidemiology3, Clare Booth, research assistant6, Nigel Klein, professor of infectious diseases and immunology6, Ed Kaczmarski, director7, Robert Booy, professor of academic child health1
1 Academic Centre for Child Health, Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry at Barts and the London, University of London, London E1 1BB, 2 Department of Paediatrics, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College, London WC1E 6BT, 3 Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 3JH, 4 Health Protection Agency (South West), Stonehouse GL10 3RF, 5 Health Protection Agency, Respiratory Virus Unit, Health Protection Agency, London NW9 5HT, 6 Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Unit, Institute of Child Health, 7 Health Protection Agency, Meningococcal Reference Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester M13 9WZ
Correspondence to: R Booy robertb2{at}chw.edu.au
Objective To examine biological and social risk factors for meningococcal disease in adolescents.
Design Prospective, population based, matched cohort study with controls matched for age and sex in 1:1 matching. Controls were sought from the general practitioner.
Setting Six contiguous regions of England, which represent some 65% of the country's population.
Participants 15-19 year olds with meningococcal disease recruited at hospital admission in six regions (representing 65% of the population of England) from January 1999 to June 2000, and their matched controls.
Methods Blood samples and pernasal and throat swabs were taken from case patients at admission to hospital and from cases and matched controls at interview. Data on potential risk factors were gathered by confidential interview. Data were analysed by using univariate and multivariate conditional logistic regression.
Results 144 case control pairs were recruited (74 male (51%); median age 17.6). 114 cases (79%) were confirmed microbiologically. Significant independent risk factors for meningococcal disease were history of preceding illness (matched odds ratio 2.9, 95% confidence interval 1.4 to 5.9), intimate kissing with multiple partners (3.7, 1.7 to 8.1), being a university student (3.4, 1.2 to 10) and preterm birth (3.7, 1.0 to 13.5). Religious observance (0.09, 0.02 to 0.6) and meningococcal vaccination (0.12, 0.04 to 0.4) were associated with protection.
Conclusions Activities and events increasing risk for meningococcal disease in adolescence are different from in childhood. Students are at higher risk. Altering personal behaviours could moderate the risk. However, the development of further effective meningococcal vaccines remains a key public health priority.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses