BMJ  2006;332:389-390 (18 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.38742.554468.55 (published 8 February 2006)

Research

Determinants of primary medical care quality measured under the new UK contract: cross sectional study

Matt Sutton, professor1, Gary McLean, research fellow2

1 Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, 2 General Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow

Correspondence to: M Sutton m.sutton{at}abdn.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective To identify factors associated with the quality of primary medical care incentivised under the new UK general medical services contract.

Design Cross sectional study.

Setting NHS Ayrshire and Arran area, Scotland.

Participants 60 general practices.

Main outcome measures Quality scores reflecting the total points achieved on the 10 clinical domains and holistic care. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to relate quality scores to measures of population characteristics, urban-rural location, general practitioner characteristics, clinical team size and composition, practice characteristics, and income from other sources.

Results Deprivation was associated with higher scores. Quality scores increased with the size of the clinical team. Practices with higher income from other sources had lower quality scores. Practices that were accredited, had training status, or contained younger general practitioners had higher quality scores, but these effects were explained by other associated factors. 53% of the variation in quality scores was explained by a multivariate model, which included measures of deprivation, clinical team size and composition, and financial incentives.

Conclusions Population characteristics showed little association with the quality of primary medical care incentivised under the UK general medical services contract. Larger clinical teams delivered higher quality clinical care, but the nurse-doctor composition of the clinical team did not influence quality. Practices that were more likely to respond to financial incentives because of previous behaviour or lower income from other sources recorded higher quality. If generalisable, the results suggest that initiatives to improve primary medical care quality should focus on the structure and resourcing of providers.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Larger clinical teams deliver higher quality primary care
BMJ 2006 332: 0. [Full Text]

Improvements in quality of clinical care in English general practice 1998-2003: longitudinal observational study
Stephen M Campbell, Martin O Roland, Elizabeth Middleton, and David Reeves
BMJ 2005 331: 1121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

NHS criticised for lax control over drugs industry
Zosia Kmietowicz
BMJ 2005 330: 805. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors
Sue Horrocks, Elizabeth Anderson, and Chris Salisbury
BMJ 2002 324: 819-823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study
S M Campbell, M Hann, J Hacker, C Burns, D Oliver, A Thapar, N Mead, D Gelb Safran, and M O Roland
BMJ 2001 323: 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Christianson, J. B., Leatherman, S., Sutherland, K. (2008). Lessons From Evaluations of Purchaser Pay-for-Performance Programs: A Review of the Evidence. Med Care Res Rev 65: 5S-35S [Abstract]  
  • Hogg, W., Rowan, M., Russell, G., Geneau, R., Muldoon, L. (2008). Framework for primary care organizations: the importance of a structural domain. Int J Qual Health Care 20: 308-313 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Campbell, S. M., McDonald, R., Lester, H. (2008). The Experience of Pay for Performance in English Family Practice: A Qualitative Study. Ann Fam Med 6: 228-234 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • McLean, G., Guthrie, B., Sutton, M. (2007). Differences in the quality of primary medical care services by remoteness from urban settlements. Qual Saf Health Care 16: 446-449 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Alberti, H., Boudriga, N., Nabli, M. (2007). "Damm Sokkor": Factors Associated With the Quality of Care of Patients With Diabetes: A study in primary care in Tunisia. Diabetes Care 30: 2013-2018 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • van Driel, M L, Coenen, S, Dirven, K, Lobbestael, J, Janssens, I, Van Royen, P, Haaijer-Ruskamp, F M, De Meyere, M, De Maeseneer, J, Christiaens, T (2007). What is the role of quality circles in strategies to optimise antibiotic prescribing? A pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial in primary care. Qual Saf Health Care 16: 197-202 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Misleading study
Peter MR von Kaehne
bmj.com, 19 Feb 2006 [Full text]
Confounding variables
Gwion Rhys
bmj.com, 18 Feb 2006 [Full text]
Larger means for peer review
Graeme M Mackenzie
bmj.com, 21 Feb 2006 [Full text]
PMS difference for Lower QoF Scores
John S. Ashcroft
bmj.com, 24 Feb 2006 [Full text]
premature conclusion
robert fleetcroft
bmj.com, 27 Feb 2006 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ