BMJ  2006;332:79-85 (14 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.38698.458866.7C (published 6 January 2006)

Research

Lifetime effects, costs, and cost effectiveness of testing for human papillomavirus to manage low grade cytological abnormalities: results of the NHS pilot studies

Rosa Legood, senior researcher1, Alastair Gray, professor of health economics1, Jane Wolstenholme, senior researcher1, Sue Moss, associate director2

1 Health Economics Research Centre, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, 2 Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG

Correspondence to: R Legood rosa.legood{at}dphpc.ox.ac.uk

Abstract

Objectives To predict the incremental lifetime effects, costs, and cost effectiveness of using human papillomavirus testing to triage women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear results for immediate colposcopy.

Design Modelling study.

Setting Three centres participating in NHS pilot studies, United Kingdom.

Population Women aged 25-64 with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear results.

Interventions Screening using conventional cytology, liquid based cytology, and four strategies with different age cut-off points and follow up times that used combined liquid based cytology and human papillomavirus testing (adjunctive human papillomavirus testing).

Results The model predicts that compared with using conventional cytology without testing for human papillomavirus, testing for the virus in conjunction with liquid based cytology for women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear results (aged 35 or more) would cost £3735 (euros5528; $6474) per life year saved. Extending adjunctive human papillomavirus testing in combination with liquid based cytology to include women aged between 25 and 34 costs an additional £4233 per life year saved. Human papillomavirus testing is likely to reduce lifetime repeat smears by 52%-86% but increase lifetime colposcopies by 64%-138%.

Conclusions Testing for human papillomavirus to manage all women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear results is likely to be cost effective. The predicted increase in lifetime colposcopies, however, deserves careful consideration.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Options for managing low grade cervical abnormalities detected at screening: cost effectiveness study
TOMBOLA Group
BMJ 2009 339: b2549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

When to test women for human papillomavirus: Take this opportunity to screen for anal cancer too
Awori J Hayanga
BMJ 2006 332: 237. [Extract] [Full Text]

HPV triage could be cost effective
BMJ 2006 332: 0. [Full Text]

When to test women for human papillomavirus
Mark Schiffman and Philip E Castle
BMJ 2006 332: 61-62. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Effect of testing for human papillomavirus as a triage during screening for cervical cancer: observational before and after study
Sue Moss, Alastair Gray, Rosa Legood, Martin Vessey, Julietta Patnick, Henry Kitchener Liquid Based Cytology/Human Papillomavirus Cervical Pilot Studies Group
BMJ 2006 332: 83-85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • TOMBOLA Group, (2009). Options for managing low grade cervical abnormalities detected at screening: cost effectiveness study. BMJ 339: b2549-b2549 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Goldsmith, M R, Austoker, J, Marsh, G, Kehoe, S T, Bankhead, C R (2008). Cervical screening result communication: a focus-group investigation of English women's experiences and needs. Qual Saf Health Care 17: 334-338 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Monsonego, J., Pollini, G., Evrard, M. J., Sednaoui, P., Monfort, L., Quinzat, D., Dachez, R., Syrjanen, K. (2008). Linear array genotyping and hybrid capture II assay in detecting human papillomavirus genotypes in women referred for colposcopy due to abnormal Papanicolaou smear. Int J STD AIDS 19: 385-392 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Groot Koerkamp, B., Hunink, M.G. M., Stijnen, T., Hammitt, J. K., Kuntz, K. M., Weinstein, M. C. (2007). Limitations of Acceptability Curves for Presenting Uncertainty in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Med Decis Making 27: 101-111 [Abstract]  
  • Lillo, F. B., Uberti-Foppa, C. (2006). Human papillomavirus viral load: a possible marker for cervical disease in HIV-infected women. J Antimicrob Chemother 57: 810-814 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Hayanga, A. J (2006). When to test women for human papillomavirus: Take this opportunity to screen for anal cancer too. BMJ 332: 237-237 [Full text]  
  • Schiffman, M., Castle, P. E (2006). When to test women for human papillomavirus. BMJ 332: 61-62 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Take this opportunity to screen for anal cancer too.
Awori J Hayanga
bmj.com, 15 Jan 2006 [Full text]
Does this Study model the current Cytology Screening Programme?
Bernard J Charnley
bmj.com, 23 Jan 2006 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ