BMJ 2006;332:14-19 (7 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.38678.405370.7C (published 15 December 2005)
Research
Partner notification of chlamydia infection in primary care: randomised controlled trial and analysis of resource use
Nicola Low, senior lecturer in epidemiology and public health1,
Anne McCarthy, research fellow1,
Tracy E Roberts, senior lecturer in health economics2,
Mia Huengsberg, consultant3,
Emma Sanford, research associate1,
Jonathan A C Sterne, reader in medical statistics and epidemiology1,
John Macleod, senior lecturer in primary care5,
Chris Salisbury, professor6,
Karl Pye, research health adviser4,
Aisha Holloway, research fellow5,
Andrea Morcom, research assistant5,
Rita Patel, research assistant6,
Suzanne M Robinson, lecturer in health economics2,
Paddy Horner, consultant4,
Pelham M Barton, lecturer in mathematical modelling2,
Matthias Egger, professor of epidemiology1,7
1 Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR,
2 Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT,
3 Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Heart of Birmingham Teaching Primary Care Trust, Whittall Street Clinic, Birmingham B4 6DH,
4 Department of Genitourinary Medicine, United Bristol Healthcare Trust, Milne Centre for Sexual Health, Bristol BS2 8EE,
5 Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Birmingham,
6 Academic Unit of Primary Health Care, University of Bristol, Bristol BS6 6JL,
7 Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Berne, CH-3012, Switzerland
Correspondence to: Dr N Low, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Berne, Finkenhubelweg 11, Berne, CH-3012, Switzerland low{at}ispm.unibe.ch
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of a practice nurse led strategy to improve the notification and treatment of partners of people with chlamydia infection.
Design Randomised controlled trial.
Setting 27 general practices in the Bristol and Birmingham areas.
Participants 140 men and women with chlamydia (index cases) diagnosed by screening of a home collected urine sample or vulval swab specimen.
Interventions Partner notification at the general practice immediately after diagnosis by trained practice nurses, with telephone follow up by a health adviser; or referral to a specialist health adviser at a genitourinary medicine clinic.
Main outcome measures Primary outcome was the proportion of index cases with at least one treated sexual partner. Specified secondary outcomes included the number of sexual contacts elicited during a sexual history, positive test result for chlamydia six weeks after treatment, and the cost of each strategy in 2003 sterling prices.
Results 65.3% (47/72) of participants receiving practice nurse led partner notification had at least one partner treated compared with 52.9% (39/68) of those referred to a genitourinary medicine clinic (risk difference 12.4%, 95% confidence interval -1.8% to 26.5%). Of 68 participants referred to the clinic, 21 (31%) did not attend. The costs per index case were £32.55 for the practice nurse led strategy and £32.62 for the specialist referral strategy.
Conclusion Practice based partner notification by trained nurses with telephone follow up by health advisers is at least as effective as referral to a specialist health adviser at a genitourinary medicine clinic, and costs the same.
Trial registration Clinical trials: NCT00112255
[ClinicalTrials.gov]
.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Articles
-
Vaginal discharge
- Des Spence and Catriona Melville
BMJ 2007 335: 1147-1151.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Cost effectiveness of home based population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in the UK: economic evaluation of chlamydia screening studies (ClaSS) project
- Tracy E Roberts, Suzanne Robinson, Pelham M Barton, Stirling Bryan, Anne McCarthy, John Macleod, Matthias Egger, and Nicola Low
BMJ 2007 335: 291.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Improved effectiveness of partner notification for patients with sexually transmitted infections: systematic review
- Sven Trelle, Aijing Shang, Linda Nartey, Jackie A Cassell, and Nicola Low
BMJ 2007 334: 354.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Let practice nurses tell partners about chlamydia
BMJ 2006 332: 0.
[Full Text]
-
Doing things differently
- Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2006 332: 0.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional study
- John Macleod, Chris Salisbury, Nicola Low, Anne McCarthy, Jonathan A C Sterne, Aisha Holloway, Rita Patel, Emma Sanford, Andrea Morcom, Paddy Horner, George Davey Smith, Susan Skidmore, Alan Herring, Owen Caul, F D Richard Hobbs, and Matthias Egger
BMJ 2005 330: 940.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Sexual health
- Michael Adler
BMJ 2003 327: 62-63.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
Related external webpages:
- Paper plus
- NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Creighton, S, Apea, V
(2009). The evolution of an integrated sexual health service. Int J STD AIDS
20: 723-725
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Kretzschmar, M, Turner, K M E, Barton, P M, Edmunds, W J, Low, N
(2009). Predicting the population impact of chlamydia screening programmes: comparative mathematical modelling study. Sex. Transm. Infect.
85: 359-366
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Wilson, T. E., Hogben, M., Malka, E. S., Liddon, N., McCormack, W. M., Rubin, S. R., Augenbraun, M. A.
(2009). A Randomized Controlled Trial for Reducing Risks for Sexually Transmitted Infections Through Enhanced Patient-Based Partner Notification. Am. J. Public Health
99: S104-S110
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Spence, D., Melville, C.
(2007). Vaginal discharge. BMJ
335: 1147-1151
[Full text]
-
Roberts, T. E, Robinson, S., Barton, P. M, Bryan, S., McCarthy, A., Macleod, J., Egger, M., Low, N.
(2007). Cost effectiveness of home based population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in the UK: economic evaluation of chlamydia screening studies (ClaSS) project. BMJ
335: 291-291
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Robinson, S., Roberts, T., Barton, P., Bryan, S., Macleod, J., McCarthy, A., Egger, M., Sanford, E., Low, N., for the Chlamydia Screening Studies (ClaSS) Projec,
(2007). Healthcare and patient costs of a proactive chlamydia screening programme: the Chlamydia Screening Studies project. Sex. Transm. Infect.
83: 276-281
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Hughes, G., Williams, T., Simms, I., Mercer, C., Fenton, K., Cassell, J.
(2007). Use of a primary care database to determine trends in genital chlamydia testing, diagnostic episodes and management in UK general practice, 1990 2004. Sex. Transm. Infect.
83: 310-313
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Oakeshott, P., Graham, A.
(2007). NICE guidance on one-to-one interventions to reduce sexually transmitted infections and under-18 conceptions: a view from general practice. Sex. Transm. Infect.
83: 171-172
[Full text]
-
Trelle, S., Shang, A., Nartey, L., Cassell, J. A, Low, N.
(2007). Improved effectiveness of partner notification for patients with sexually transmitted infections: systematic review. BMJ
334: 354-354
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Mills, N., Daker-White, G., Graham, A., Campbell, R., For The Chlamydia Screening Studies (ClaSS) Group,
(2006). Population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the UK: a qualitative study of the experiences of those screened. Fam Pract
23: 550-557
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Roberts, T E, Robinson, S, Barton, P, Bryan, S, Low, N, for the Chlamydia Screening Studies (ClaSS) Group,
(2006). Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a systematic review of the economic evaluations and modelling.. Sex. Transm. Infect.
82: 193-200
[Abstract]
[Full text]