BMJ  2005;331:1121 (12 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.38632.611123.AE (published 28 October 2005)

Primary care

Improvements in quality of clinical care in English general practice 1998-2003: longitudinal observational study

¹ National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL

Objective To measure changes in quality of care for three major chronic diseases (coronary heart disease, asthma, and type 2 diabetes) between 1998 and 2003.

Design Longitudinal cohort study.

Setting 42 general practices in six geographical areas of England (Avon, Bury/Rochdale, Enfield, Oldham, Somerset, South Essex).

Participants Medical record data for 2300 patients with diabetes, asthma, or coronary heart disease in 1998, and 1495 patients in 2003.

Main outcome measure Quality of care assessed against predefined evidence based review criteria.

Results Between 1998 and 2003, quality of care improved markedly in terms of maximum possible scores on the review criteria, from 60.5% to 78.1% for coronary heart disease (change = 17.6, 95% confidence interval 13.9 to 21.4; P < 0.001), 60.1% to 70.3% for asthma (10.2, 4.6 to 15.8; P = 0.001), and 70.4% to 77.7% for diabetes (7.3, 3.5 to 11.1; P = 0.001). Important changes occurred to several indicators potentially related to improved health outcomes. These included improved control of serum cholesterol (to 5 mmol/l) from 17.6% to 61.4% in coronary heart disease and from 21.5% to 52% in diabetes and control of blood pressure to 150/90 in coronary heart disease from 47.3% to 72.2% and to 145/85 in diabetes from 21.8% to 35.8%. A small, non-significant improvement in glycaemic control occurred among diabetic patients (37.9% to 39.7% with HbA_1c < 7.4%). Significant improvements also occurred in the recording of exercise capacity and diet and weight advice for patients with coronary heart disease; of smoking advice, peak flow, and symptoms for patients with asthma; and of creatinine, weight, and HbA_1c for patients with diabetes. Over the five years, more improvement in coronary heart disease care occurred in large practices and practices in affluent areas.

Conclusions Substantial improvements were seen in quality of care for the three conditions studied between 1998 and 2003, a time of systematic quality improvement initiatives in the NHS. The changes were most marked for coronary heart disease. English general practices could be expected to achieve high clinical quality scores in the initial year of a new contact, which provides financial incentives for high quality care from 2004.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Future of quality measurement

Helen Lester and Martin Roland
BMJ 2007 335: 1130-1131. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Impact of financial incentives on clinical autonomy and internal motivation in primary care: ethnographic study

Ruth McDonald, Stephen Harrison, Kath Checkland, Stephen M Campbell, and Martin Roland
BMJ 2007 334: 1357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Determinants of primary medical care quality measured under the new UK contract: cross sectional study

Matt Sutton and Gary McLean
BMJ 2006 332: 389-390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Diabetes and the quality and outcomes framework

Colin Kenny
BMJ 2005 331: 1097-1098. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study

S M Campbell, M Hann, J Hacker, C Burns, D Oliver, A Thapar, N Mead, D Gelb Safran, and M O Roland
BMJ 2001 323: 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Campbell, S. M., McDonald, R., Lester, H. (2008). The Experience of Pay for Performance in English Family Practice: A Qualitative Study. Ann Fam Med 6: 228-234 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• MacBride-Stewart, S. P, Elton, R., Walley, T. (2008). Do quality incentives change prescribing patterns in primary care? An observational study in Scotland. Fam Pract 0: cmm074v1-cmm074 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• McGovern, M. P, Boroujerdi, M. A, Taylor, M. W, Williams, D. J, Hannaford, P. C, Lefevre, K. E, Simpson, C. R (2008). The effect of the UK incentive-based contract on the management of patients with coronary heart disease in primary care. Fam Pract 25: 33-39 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Millett, C., Saxena, S., Ng, A., Mainous, A. III, Majeed, A. (2007). Socio-economic status, ethnicity and diabetes management: an analysis of time trends using the health survey for England. J Public Health (Oxf) 29: 413-419 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Lester, H., Roland, M. (2007). Future of quality measurement. BMJ 335: 1130-1131 [Full text]  
• Nitsch, D., Burden, R., Steenkamp, R., Ansell, D., Byrne, C., Caskey, F., Roderick, P., Feest, T. (2007). Patients with diabetic nephropathy on renal replacement therapy in England and Wales. QJM 100: 551-560 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Panoulas, V. F., Douglas, K. M. J., Milionis, H. J., Stavropoulos-Kalinglou, A., Nightingale, P., Kita, M. D., Tselios, A. L., Metsios, G. S., Elisaf, M. S., Kitas, G. D. (2007). Prevalence and associations of hypertension and its control in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 46: 1477-1482 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Alberti, H., Boudriga, N., Nabli, M. (2007). "Damm Sokkor": Factors Associated With the Quality of Care of Patients With Diabetes: A study in primary care in Tunisia. Diabetes Care 30: 2013-2018 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Campbell, S., Reeves, D., Kontopantelis, E., Middleton, E., Sibbald, B., Roland, M. (2007). Quality of Primary Care in England with the Introduction of Pay for Performance. NEJM 357: 181-190 [Full text]  
• McDonald, R., Harrison, S., Checkland, K., Campbell, S. M, Roland, M. (2007). Impact of financial incentives on clinical autonomy and internal motivation in primary care: ethnographic study. BMJ 334: 1357-1357 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Gray, J., Millett, C., O'Sullivan, C., Omar, R. Z, Majeed, A. (2006). Association of age, sex and deprivation with quality indicators for diabetes: population-based cross sectional survey in primary care. JRSM 99: 576-581 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Schade, C. P., Sullivan, F. M., de Lusignan, S., Madeley, J. (2006). e-Prescribing, Efficiency, Quality: Lessons from the Computerization of UK Family Practice. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 13: 470-475 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Simpson, C. R., Hannaford, P. C., Lefevre, K., Williams, D. (2006). Effect of the UK Incentive-Based Contract on the Management of Patients With Stroke in Primary Care. Stroke 37: 2354-2360 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Doran, T., Fullwood, C., Gravelle, H., Reeves, D., Kontopantelis, E., Hiroeh, U., Roland, M. (2006). Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom.. NEJM 355: 375-384 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Sutton, M., McLean, G. (2006). Determinants of primary medical care quality measured under the new UK contract: cross sectional study. BMJ 332: 389-390 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Wilson, T., Roland, M., Ham, C. (2006). The contribution of general practice and the general practitioner to NHS patients. JRSM 99: 24-28 [Full text]  
• Kenny, C. (2005). Diabetes and the quality and outcomes framework. BMJ 331: 1097-1098 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Improvements in data recording, not in quality of clinical care.

Hendrik J Beerstecher
bmj.com, 13 Nov 2005 [Full text]