BMJ  2005;331:1113-1117 (12 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.38629.587639.7C (published 19 October 2005)

Paper

Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe): population based cohort study

Jason Gardosi, director1, Sue M Kady, perinatal research fellow1, Pat McGeown, head of midwifery1, Andre Francis, statistician1, Ann Tonks, data analyst1

1 Perinatal Institute, Birmingham B6 5RQ

Correspondence to: J Gardosi gardosi{at}perinatal.nhs.uk

Objective To develop and test a new classification system for stillbirths to help improve understanding of the main causes and conditions associated with fetal death.

Design Population based cohort study.

Setting West Midlands region.

Subjects 2625 stillbirths from 1997 to 2003.

Main outcome measures Categories of death according to conventional classification methods and a newly developed system (ReCoDe, relevant condition at death).

Results By the conventional Wigglesworth classification, 66.2% of the stillbirths (1738 of 2625) were unexplained. The median gestational age of the unexplained group was 237 days, significantly higher than the stillbirths in the other categories (210 days; P < 0.001). The proportion of stillbirths that were unexplained was high regardless of whether a postmortem examination had been carried out or not (67% and 65%; P = 0.3). By the ReCoDe classification, the most common condition was fetal growth restriction (43.0%), and only 15.2% of stillbirths remained unexplained. ReCoDe identified 57.7% of the Wigglesworth unexplained stillbirths as growth restricted. The size of the category for intrapartum asphyxia was reduced from 11.7% (Wigglesworth) to 3.4% (ReCoDe).

Conclusion The new ReCoDe classification system reduces the predominance of stillbirths currently categorised as unexplained. Fetal growth restriction is a common antecedent of stillbirth, but its high prevalence is hidden by current classification systems. This finding has profound implications for maternity services, and raises the question whether some hitherto "unexplained" stillbirths may be avoidable.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Classification of stillbirth: Classification is not explanation
Edwin P Kirk
BMJ 2005 331: 1269. [Extract] [Full Text]

Classification of stillbirth: Reclassification obscures things
Neil J Sebire
BMJ 2005 331: 1269. [Extract] [Full Text]

Classification of stillbirth: Cause, condition, or mechanism?
Jan Jaap HM Erwich
BMJ 2005 331: 1269-1270. [Extract] [Full Text]

Stillbirths could be better classified
BMJ 2005 331: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Reddy, U. M., Filly, R. A., Copel, J. A. (2008). Prenatal Imaging: Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Obstet Gynecol 112: 145-157 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Khashan, A. S., McNamee, R., Abel, K. M., Pedersen, M. G., Webb, R. T., Kenny, L. C., Mortensen, P. B., Baker, P. N. (2008). Reduced Infant Birthweight Consequent Upon Maternal Exposure to Severe Life Events. Psychosom. Med. 70: 688-694 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • (2008). BMFMS: Pregnancy Outcome. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 93: Fa81-Fa94 [Full text]  
  • Korteweg, F. J., Bouman, K., Erwich, J. J. H. M., Timmer, A., Veeger, N. J. G. M., Ravise, J. M., Nijman, T. H., Holm, J. P. (2008). Cytogenetic Analysis After Evaluation of 750 Fetal Deaths: Proposal for Diagnostic Workup. Obstet Gynecol 111: 865-874 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Chappell, L. C., Enye, S., Seed, P., Briley, A. L., Poston, L., Shennan, A. H. (2008). Adverse Perinatal Outcomes and Risk Factors for Preeclampsia in Women With Chronic Hypertension: A Prospective Study. Hypertension 51: 1002-1009 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Kitzmuller, C., Haines, R. L., Codlin, S., Cutler, D. F., Mole, S. E. (2008). A function retained by the common mutant CLN3 protein is responsible for the late onset of juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. Hum Mol Genet 17: 303-312 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Reddy, U. M. (2007). Prediction and Prevention of Recurrent Stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol 110: 1151-1164 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Silver, R. M. (2007). Fetal Death. Obstet Gynecol 109: 153-167 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Kirk, E. P (2005). Classification of stillbirth: Classification is not explanation. BMJ 331: 1269-1269 [Full text]  
  • Sebire, N. J (2005). Classification of stillbirth: Reclassification obscures things. BMJ 331: 1269-1269 [Full text]  
  • Erwich, J. J. H. (2005). Classification of stillbirth: Cause, condition, or mechanism?. BMJ 331: 1269-1270 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Unexplained stilbirths
Sandra F Robinson
bmj.com, 22 Oct 2005 [Full text]
Stillbirths - classification is not explanation
Edwin P Kirk
bmj.com, 11 Nov 2005 [Full text]
Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death
Neil J Sebire
bmj.com, 11 Nov 2005 [Full text]
The fetal growth charts are the main issue
mark sillender
bmj.com, 14 Nov 2005 [Full text]
Classification of stillbirth: cause, condition or mechanism?
Jan Jaap HM Erwich, et al.
bmj.com, 16 Nov 2005 [Full text]
Classification of stillbirths
Jason Gardosi
bmj.com, 17 Nov 2005 [Full text]
Customised growth charts and ReCoDe system
Pensee Wu, et al.
bmj.com, 25 Nov 2005 [Full text]
Re: Customised growth charts and ReCoDe system
Jason Gardosi
bmj.com, 1 Dec 2005 [Full text]
Classification and Growth Restriction in Stillbirths
Steve J Gould, et al.
bmj.com, 2 Dec 2005 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Asylum seekers' care

UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview