BMJ  2005;331:821 (8 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.38614.449016.DE (published 28 September 2005)

Information in practice

How do elderly patients decide where to go for major surgery? Telephone interview survey

¹ VA Outcomes Group (111B), VA Medical Center, 215 N Main Street, White River Junction, VT 05009, USA, ² Department of Surgery, 2101 Taubman Center, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0346, USA

Objective To learn how patients in Medicare, the US medical insurance programme that covers elderly patients, made decisions about where to undergo major surgery and how they would make future decisions.

Design National telephone interview study.

Setting United States.

Participants 510 randomly selected Medicare beneficiaries who had undergone an elective, high risk procedure about 3 years earlier—abdominal aneurysm repair (n = 103), heart valve replacement surgery (n = 96), or resection of the bladder (n = 119), lung (n = 128), or stomach (n = 64) for cancer. Response rates were 48% among eligible survivors and 68% among those able to participate.

Results Although all participants could choose where to have surgery, only 55% said there was an alternative hospital in their area where they could have gone. Overall, only 10% of respondents seriously considered going elsewhere for surgery. Few respondents (11%) looked for information to compare hospitals. Almost all respondents thought their hospital and surgeon had good reputations (94% and 88%, respectively), beliefs mostly determined by what their referring doctors said. When asked how much various factors would influence their advice to a friend about choosing where to go for major surgery, surgeon reputation was the most influential (78% said it would influence their advice "a lot"), followed by the hospital having "nationally recognised" surgeons (63%), and then various performance data (surgeon volume (58%), nurse:patient ratios (49%), number of operations carried out by the hospital (48%), and hospital operative mortality (45%)). Forty per cent said they would act on mortality data, indicating that they would switch from their initial choice of hospital to a different one if its mortality was a percentage point lower (that is, 3% v 4%).

Conclusion Some respondents claimed they would switch hospital for elective surgery on the basis of mortality data. Since most respondents relied on their referring physician's opinion to decide where to have surgery, surgical performance data ought to be accessible to referring physicians.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Mortality data in adult cardiac surgery for named surgeons: retrospective examination of prospectively collected data on coronary artery surgery and aortic valve replacement

Ben Bridgewater on behalf of the adult cardiac surgeons of north west England
BMJ 2005 330: 506-510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Ettinger, W. H., Hylka, S. M., Phillips, R. A., Harrison, L. H. Jr, Cyr, J. A., Sussman, A. J. (2008). When Things Go Wrong: The Impact of Being a Statistical Outlier in Publicly Reported Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Mortality Data. American Journal of Medical Quality 23: 90-95 [Abstract]  
• Wilson, C. T., Woloshin, S., Schwartz, L. M. (2007). Choosing Where to Have Major Surgery: Who Makes the Decision?. Arch Surg 142: 242-246 [Abstract] [Full text]