BMJ  2005;331:544 (10 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7516.544

Paper

Cost effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems: findings of the randomised UK alcohol treatment trial (UKATT)

Objective To compare the cost effectiveness of social behaviour and network therapy, a new treatment for alcohol problems, with that of the proved motivational enhancement therapy.

Design Cost effectiveness analysis alongside a pragmatic randomised trial.

Setting Seven treatment sites around Birmingham, Cardiff, and Leeds.

Participants 742 clients with alcohol problems; 617 (83.2%) were interviewed at 12 months and full economic data were obtained on 608 (98.5% of 617).

Main economic measures Quality adjusted life years (QALYs), costs of trial treatments, and consequences for public sector resources (health care, other alcohol treatment, social services, and criminal justice services).

Results Both therapies saved about five times as much in expenditure on health, social, and criminal justice services as they cost. Neither net savings nor cost effectiveness differed significantly between the therapies, despite the average cost of social behaviour and network therapy (£221; $385; 320) being significantly more than that of motivational enhancement therapy (£129). If a QALY were worth £30 000, then the motivational therapy would have 58% chance of being more cost effective than the social therapy, and the social therapy would have 42% chance of being more cost effective than the motivational therapy.

Conclusion Participants reported highly significant reductions in drinking and associated problems and costs. The novel social behaviour and network therapy did not differ significantly in cost effectiveness from the proved motivational enhancement therapy.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Parenting programme for parents of children at risk of developing conduct disorder: cost effectiveness analysis

Rhiannon T Edwards, Alan Céilleachair, Tracey Bywater, Dyfrig A Hughes, and Judy Hutchings
BMJ 2007 334: 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Treatment options for alcoholism haven't advanced
BMJ 2005 331: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

British drinking: a suitable case for treatment?

Wayne Hall
BMJ 2005 331: 527-528. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems: findings of the randomised UK alcohol treatment trial (UKATT)

UKATT Research Team
BMJ 2005 331: 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

NICE: faster access to modern treatments? Analysis of guidance on health technologies

James Raftery
BMJ 2001 323: 1300-1303. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Statistics Notes: Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements

Andrew J Vickers and Douglas G Altman
BMJ 2001 323: 1123-1124. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Newham, R., Russell, C., Davies, J. B. (2009). Planned and Unplanned Discharge from Alcohol Services in Scotland, 2004-2008. Alcohol Alcohol 0: agp081v1-agp081 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Nelson, A. L., Cohen, J. T., Greenberg, D., Kent, D. M. (2009). Much Cheaper, Almost as Good: Decrementally Cost-Effective Medical Innovation. ANN INTERN MED 151: 662-667 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Barbosa, C., Godfrey, C., Parrott, S. (2009). Methodological Assessment of Economic Evaluations of Alcohol Treatment: What Is Missing?. Alcohol Alcohol 0: agp067v1-agp067 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Orford, J., Hodgson, R., Copello, A., Krishnan, M., de Madariaga, M., Coulton, S., on behalf of the UKATT Research Team, (2009). What Was Useful about That Session? Clients' and Therapists' Comments after Sessions in the UK Alcohol Treatment Trial (UKATT). Alcohol Alcohol 44: 306-313 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Zarkin, G. A., Bray, J. W., Aldridge, A., Mitra, D., Mills, M. J., Couper, D. J., Cisler, R. A., for the COMBINE Cost-Effectiveness Research Group, (2008). Cost and Cost-effectiveness of the COMBINE Study in Alcohol-Dependent Patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry 65: 1214-1221 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Luty, J., Carnwath, T. (2008). Specialised alcohol treatment services are a luxury the NHS cannot afford. Br. J. Psychiatry 192: 245-247 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Gordon, L., Graves, N., Hawkes, A., Eakin, E. (2007). A review of the cost-effectiveness of face-to-face behavioural interventions for smoking, physical activity, diet and alcohol. Chronic Illness 3: 101-129 [Abstract]  
• Edwards, R. T, Ceilleachair, A., Bywater, T., Hughes, D. A, Hutchings, J. (2007). Parenting programme for parents of children at risk of developing conduct disorder: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ 334: 682-682 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Groot Koerkamp, B., Hunink, M.G. M., Stijnen, T., Hammitt, J. K., Kuntz, K. M., Weinstein, M. C. (2007). Limitations of Acceptability Curves for Presenting Uncertainty in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Med Decis Making 27: 101-111 [Abstract]  
• Hall, W. (2005). British drinking: a suitable case for treatment?. BMJ 331: 527-528 [Full text]  
• UKATT Research Team, (2005). Effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems: findings of the randomised UK alcohol treatment trial (UKATT). BMJ 331: 541- [Abstract] [Full text]  

Online poll

Find out more on doc2doc >>