BMJ  2005;331:428 (20 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.38537.397512.55 (published 12 July 2005)

Paper

Role of mobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance: a case-crossover study

¹ The George Institute for International Health, University of Sydney, PO Box M201, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia, ² Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Arlington, VA, USA, ³ Injury Research Centre, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia

Objectives To explore the effect of drivers' use of mobile (cell) phones on road safety.

Design A case-crossover study.

Setting Perth, Western Australia.

Participants 456 drivers aged 17 years who owned or used mobile phones and had been involved in road crashes necessitating hospital attendance between April 2002 and July 2004.

Main outcome measure Driver's use of mobile phone at estimated time of crash and on trips at the same time of day in the week before the crash. Interviews with drivers in hospital and phone company's records of phone use.

Results Driver's use of a mobile phone up to 10 minutes before a crash was associated with a fourfold increased likelihood of crashing (odds ratio 4.1, 95% confidence interval 2.2 to 7.7, P < 0.001). Risk was raised irrespective of whether or not a hands-free device was used (hands-free: 3.8, 1.8 to 8.0, P < 0.001; hand held: 4.9, 1.6 to 15.5, P = 0.003). Increased risk was similar in men and women and in drivers aged 30 and < 30 years. A third (n = 21) of calls before crashes and on trips during the previous week were reportedly on hand held phones.

Conclusions When drivers use a mobile phone there is an increased likelihood of a crash resulting in injury. Using a hands-free phone is not any safer.

Related Articles

Hit parade
BMJ 2005 331: 784. [Extract] [Full Text]

Mobile phones increase risk of having a road crash
BMJ 2005 331: 0. [Full Text]

Let's call it cardiac impairment

Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2005 331: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Related external webpages:

Paper plus

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Vandenbroucke, J. P., Elm, E. v., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Mulrow, C. D., Pocock, S. J., Poole, C., Schlesselman, J. J., Egger, M., for the STROBE initiative, (2007). Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration. ANN INTERN MED 147: W-163-W-194 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Pring, D W, Young, R A, Feaster, H, Tang, T (2007). An audit of compliance with motor traffic regulations and use of green warning lights by consultants recalled to hospital to attend emergencies. Emerg. Med. J. 24: 244-247 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• McEvoy, S P, Stevenson, M R, Woodward, M (2006). The impact of driver distraction on road safety: results from a representative survey in two Australian states.. Inj. Prev. 12: 242-247 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Malik, I. (2005). JournalScan. Heart 91: 1631-1632 [Full text]  
• Wyatt, J, Sampson, A (2005). Journal scan. Emerg. Med. J. 22: 812-812 [Full text]  
• (2005). From the Library. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 89: 1546-1546 [Full text]  
• (2005). Hit parade. BMJ 331: 784-784 [Full text]  
• (2005). Mobile Phones Associated with Car Crashes. JWatch Gastroenterology 2005: 9-9 [Full text]  
• (2005). Mobile Phones Associated with Car Crashes. JWatch General 2005: 5-5 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Scrutiny of Cell Phone Statistics

A. Elizabeth Griffith
bmj.com, 13 Jul 2005 [Full text]

Ban Conversation

Alexander C. Tsai
bmj.com, 14 Jul 2005 [Full text]

Talking and driving

Sam Richmond
bmj.com, 14 Jul 2005 [Full text]

Re: Scrutiny of Cell Phone Statistics

Andrew Thatcher
bmj.com, 15 Jul 2005 [Full text]

Causality

Ben Palmer
bmj.com, 16 Jul 2005 [Full text]

Limiting selection of participants to those involved in an accident skews results.

Mitchell L Frieder
bmj.com, 16 Jul 2005 [Full text]

Attitudes to transport casualties: private versus public

Tony H. Reinhardt-Rutland
bmj.com, 29 Jul 2005 [Full text]

Re: Attitudes to transport casualties: private versus public

Ben Palmer
bmj.com, 3 Aug 2005 [Full text]

Conversation with passengers likely to be safer than via the phone

Matthew L Grove
bmj.com, 4 Aug 2005 [Full text]

Re: Conversation with passengers likely to be safer than via the phone

Ben Palmer
bmj.com, 4 Aug 2005 [Full text]

Reply to Ben Palmer

Matthew L Grove
bmj.com, 5 Aug 2005 [Full text]

RF from a cell phone may be a factor

John M. Williams
bmj.com, 20 Aug 2005 [Full text]

Driving time is not "downtime"

Richard K Howell
bmj.com, 22 Aug 2005 [Full text]

Methodologic Limitations of the Case-Crossover Study

David A Lombardi
bmj.com, 25 Aug 2005 [Full text]

Re: Multi-tasking

John H. Lange
bmj.com, 28 Aug 2005 [Full text]

Re: RF from a cell phone may be a factor

Ben Palmer
bmj.com, 29 Aug 2005 [Full text]

Re: Re: RF from a cell phone may be a factor

John M. Williams
bmj.com, 30 Aug 2005 [Full text]

Mobile phones, alcohol or high speeds?

Frank J Leavitt
bmj.com, 31 Aug 2005 [Full text]

Driven To Distraction

LAYAN B GAMAGE, et al.
bmj.com, 10 Sep 2005 [Full text]

Authors' reply

Suzanne P McEvoy, et al.
bmj.com, 15 Sep 2005 [Full text]

mobile phone health issues

Anthony G Harrison
bmj.com, 7 Nov 2005 [Full text]

cell phone usage while driving

Jeremy C. Klein
bmj.com, 1 Feb 2006 [Full text]

A balanced view of driver distractions

David Clegg
bmj.com, 20 Feb 2007 [Full text]

Study Bias

Ian Thomason
bmj.com, 2 Apr 2008 [Full text]