BMJ  2005;331:379-382 (13 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7513.379

Paper

Variability in interpretation of chest radiographs among Russian clinicians and implications for screening programmes: observational study

Y Balabanova, research associate1, R Coker, senior lecturer6, I Fedorin, chief physician2, S Zakharova, chief physician3, S Plavinskij, professor4, N Krukov, professor5, R Atun, reader7, F Drobniewski, professor1

1 Health Protection Agency National Mycobacterium Reference Unit, Department of Microbiology and Infection, Guy's, King's, and St Thomas' Medical School, London, 2 Samara Regional Tuberculosis Service, Samara Oblast Dispensary, Samara, Russia, 3 Samara City Tuberculosis Service, Samara, Russia, 4 College for Public Health, St Petersburg Academy for Postgraduate Sciences, Russia, 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Samara State Medical University, Russia, 6 Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, 7 Centre for Health Management, Tanaka Business School, Imperial College, London

Correspondence to: F Drobniewski, Health Protection Agency National Mycobacterium Reference Unit, Institute of Cell and Molecular Sciences, Queen Mary's School of Medicine, London E1 2AT francis.drobniewski{at}kcl.ac.uk

Objective To determine variability in interpretation of chest radiographs among tuberculosis specialists, radiologists, and respiratory specialists.

Design Observational study.

Setting Tuberculosis and respiratory disease services, Samara region, Russian Federation.

Participants 101 clinicians involved in the diagnosis and management of pulmonary tuberculosis and respiratory diseases.

Main outcome measures Interobserver and intraobserver agreement on the interpretation of 50 digital chest radiographs, using a scale of poor to very good agreement ({kappa} coefficient: ≤ 0.20 poor, 0.21-0.40 fair, 0.41-0.60 moderate, 0.61-0.80 good, and 0.81-1.00 very good).

Results Agreement on the presence or absence of an abnormality was fair only ({kappa} = 0.380, 95% confidence interval 0.376 to 0.384), moderate for localisation of the abnormality (0.448, 0.444 to 0.452), and fair for a diagnosis of tuberculosis (0.387, 0.382 to 0.391). The highest levels of agreement were among radiologists. Level of experience (years of work in the specialty) influenced agreement on presence of abnormalities and cavities. Levels of intraobserver agreement were fair.

Conclusions Population screening for tuberculosis in Russia may be less than optimal owing to limited agreement on interpretation of chest radiographs, and may have implications for radiological screening programmes in other countries.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Russian doctors vary widely in interpreting chest x rays
BMJ 2005 331: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Danishevski, K., Mckee, M., Sassi, F., Maltcev, V. (2008). The decision to perform Caesarean section in Russia. Int J Qual Health Care 20: 88-94 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Brealey, S, Westwood, M (2007). Are you reading what we are reading? The effect of who interprets medical images on estimates of diagnostic test accuracy in systematic reviews. Br. J. Radiol. 80: 674-677 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Marx, F. M., Atun, R. A., Jakubowiak, W., Mckee, M., Coker, R. J. (2007). Reform of tuberculosis control and DOTS within Russian public health systems: an ecological study. Eur J Public Health 17: 98-103 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Atun, R., Samyshkin, Y, Drobniewski, F, Balabanova, Y, Fedorin, I., Lord, J, Coker, R. (2006). Costs and outcomes of tuberculosis control in the Russian Federation: retrospective cohort analysis.. Health Policy Plan 21: 353-364 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Welshman, J. (2006). Compulsion, Localism, and Pragmatism: The Micro-Politics of Tuberculosis Screening in the United Kingdom, 1950-1965. Soc Hist Med 19: 295-312 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Coker, R., Bell, A., Pitman, R., Zellweger, J-P., Heldal, E., Hayward, A., Skulberg, A., Bothamley, G., Whitfield, R., de Vries, G., Watson, J. M. (2006). Tuberculosis screening in migrants in selected European countries shows wide disparities.. Eur Respir J 27: 801-807 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • McCarron, M.O., Sands, C., McCarron, P. (2006). Quality assurance of neuroradiology in a District General Hospital. QJM 99: 171-175 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Variability in interpretation of chest radiographs among Russian clinicians: Conclusions are inappropriate for targeted TB screening programmes in other countries
Rob van Hest, et al.
bmj.com, 1 Sep 2005 [Full text]
Variability in interpretation of chest radiographs among Russian clinicians - findings not relevant for targeted TB screening in Western countries
Ken M Citron
bmj.com, 14 Oct 2005 [Full text]



Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ
Listen to the latest 

BMJ Interview