BMJ  2005;331:373-377 (13 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7513.373

Paper

Randomised controlled trial of home based motivational interviewing by midwives to help pregnant smokers quit or cut down

D M Tappin, director1, M A Lumsden, professor2, W H Gilmour, senior lecturer in medical statistics3, F Crawford, public health project manager4, D McIntyre, director5, D H Stone, professor1, R Webber, chief medical laboratory scientific officer6, S MacIndoe, administrator1, E Mohammed, lead research midwife1

1 Paediatric Epidemiology and Community Health Unit, Department of Child Health, Division of Developmental Medicine, University of Glasgow, Yorkhill, Glasgow G3 8SJ, 2 Section of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Developmental Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G31 2ER, 3 Section for Public Health and Health Policy, Division of Community Based Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RZ, 4 NHS Health Scotland, Clifton House, Glasgow G3 7LS, 5 International Non Governmental Coalition Against Tobacco, PO Box 42134, London SW8 4WS, 6 Haematology Department, Yorkhill Hospital, Glasgow G3 8SJ

Correspondence to: D M Tappin goda11{at}udcf.gla.ac.uk

Objective To determine whether motivational interviewing—a behavioural therapy for addictions—provided at home by specially trained midwives helps pregnant smokers to quit.

Design Randomised controlled non-blinded trial analysed by intention to treat.

Setting Clinics attached to two maternity hospitals in Glasgow.

Participants 762/1684 pregnant women who were regular smokers at antenatal booking: 351 in intervention group and 411 in control group.

Interventions All women received standard health promotion information. Women in the intervention group were offered motivational interviewing at home. All interviews were recorded.

Main outcome measures Self reported smoking cessation verified by plasma or salivary cotinine concentration.

Results 17/351 (4.8%) women in the intervention group stopped smoking (according to self report and serum cotinine concentration < 13.7 ng/ml) compared with 19/411(4.6%) in the control group. Fifteen (4.2%) women in the intervention group cut down (self report and cotinine concentration less than half that at booking) compared with 26 (6.3%) in the control group. Fewer women in the intervention group reported smoking more (18 (5.1%) v 44 (10.7%); relative risk 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.28 to 0.81). Birth weight did not differ significantly (mean 3078 g v 3048 g).

Conclusion Good quality motivational interviewing did not significantly increase smoking cessation among pregnant women.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Pregnant smokers don't quit after motivational interviews
BMJ 2005 331: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

More confused—but better informed
Jane Smith
BMJ 2005 331: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy
Tim Coleman, John Britton, and Jim Thornton
BMJ 2004 328: 965-966. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Implications of childhood obesity for adult health: findings from thousand families cohort study
Charlotte M Wright, Louise Parker, Douglas Lamont, and Alan W Craft
BMJ 2001 323: 1280-1284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Trends in smoking during pregnancy in England, 1992-7: quota sampling surveys
Lesley Owen, Ann McNeill, and Christine Callum
BMJ 1998 317: 728-730. [Full Text] [PDF]

Why do we need randomised controlled trials to assess behavioural interventions?
Judith Stephenson and John Imrie
BMJ 1998 316: 611-613. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Geerts, C. C., Grobbee, D. E., van der Ent, C. K., de Jong, B. M., van der Zalm, M. M., van Putte-Katier, N., Kimpen, J. L.L., Uiterwaal, C. S.P.M. (2007). Tobacco Smoke Exposure of Pregnant Mothers and Blood Pressure in Their Newborns: Results from the Wheezing Illnesses Study Leidsche Rijn Birth Cohort. Hypertension 50: 572-578 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Goodwin, R. D., Keyes, K., Simuro, N. (2007). Mental Disorders and Nicotine Dependence Among Pregnant Women in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 109: 875-883 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Rigotti, N. A., Park, E. R., Regan, S., Chang, Y., Perry, K., Loudin, B., Quinn, V. (2006). Efficacy of Telephone Counseling for Pregnant Smokers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.. Obstet Gynecol 108: 83-92 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Nature of the motivational interviewing and quality of its external quality assessment
John F Morgan
bmj.com, 13 Aug 2005 [Full text]
Behavioral interventions can be effective
John R. Polito
bmj.com, 14 Aug 2005 [Full text]
Lots of possible explanations
Malcolm I Thomas
bmj.com, 15 Aug 2005 [Full text]
Behavioural interventions must be multileveled in areas of deprivation
Vanessa K Rose
bmj.com, 16 Aug 2005 [Full text]
Authors Reply: Teaching midwives motivational interviewing for a randomised controlled trial
Jeff Allison, et al.
bmj.com, 29 Aug 2005 [Full text]
Re: Authors Reply: Teaching midwives motivational interviewing for a randomised controlled trial
John F Morgan
bmj.com, 30 Aug 2005 [Full text]
Smoking Cessation in core curricula –critiquing and using appropriate interventions.
Ann M Wylie
bmj.com, 23 Sep 2005 [Full text]



Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ
Listen to the latest 

BMJ Interview