BMJ  2005;331:26 (2 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.38483.478183.EB (published 24 June 2005)

Primary care

Diagnostic value of C reactive protein in infections of the lower respiratory tract: systematic review

¹ Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, Netherlands

Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of C reactive protein in detecting radiologically proved pneumonia and to evaluate how well it can discriminate between bacterial and viral infections of the lower respiratory tract.

Data sources Medline and Embase (January 1966 to April 2004), with reference checking.

Study selection We included articles comparing C reactive protein with a chest radiograph or with microbiological work-up as a reference test. Two authors independently assessed methodological items.

Results None of the studies met all validity criteria. Six studies used an infiltrate on chest radiograph as reference test. Sensitivities ranged from 10% to 98%, specificities from 44% to 99%. For adults, the relation of C reactive protein with an infiltrate (in a subgroup analysis of five studies) showed an area under the curve of 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.75 to 0.85). In 12 studies, the relation of C reactive protein with a bacterial aetiology of infection of the lower respiratory tract was studied. Sensitivities ranged from 8% to 99%, specificities from 27% to 95%. These data were epidemiologically and statistically heterogeneous, so overall outcomes could not be calculated.

Conclusion Testing for C reactive protein is neither sufficiently sensitive to rule out nor sufficiently specific to rule in an infiltrate on chest radiograph and bacterial aetiology of lower respiratory tract infection. The methodological quality of the diagnostic studies is generally poor. The evidence not consistently and sufficiently supports a wide introduction of C reactive protein as a rapid test to guide antibiotics prescription.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Effect of point of care testing for C reactive protein and training in communication skills on antibiotic use in lower respiratory tract infections: cluster randomised trial

Jochen W L Cals, Christopher C Butler, Rogier M Hopstaken, Kerenza Hood, and Geert-Jan Dinant
BMJ 2009 338: b1374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Sepsis: definition, epidemiology, and diagnosis

Andrew Lever and Iain Mackenzie
BMJ 2007 335: 879-883. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

CRP should not guide antibiotic prescription in pneumonia
BMJ 2005 331: 0. [Full Text]

Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials

Peter Jüni, Douglas G Altman, and Matthias Egger
BMJ 2001 323: 42-46. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Lacoma, A., Prat, C., Andreo, F., Dominguez, J. (2009). Biomarkers in the management of COPD. ERR 18: 96-104 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Cals, J. W L, Butler, C. C, Hopstaken, R. M, Hood, K., Dinant, G.-J. (2009). Effect of point of care testing for C reactive protein and training in communication skills on antibiotic use in lower respiratory tract infections: cluster randomised trial. BMJ 338: b1374-b1374 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Falk, G., Fahey, T. (2009). C-reactive protein and community-acquired pneumonia in ambulatory care: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies. Fam Pract 26: 10-21 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• (2009). BET 2. C-REACTIVE PROTEIN IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF HEART FAILURE AND CHEST INFECTION. Emerg. Med. J. 26: 58-59 [Full text]  
• Briel, M., Schuetz, P., Mueller, B., Young, J., Schild, U., Nusbaumer, C., Periat, P., Bucher, H. C., Christ-Crain, M. (2008). Procalcitonin-Guided Antibiotic Use vs a Standard Approach for Acute Respiratory Tract Infections in Primary Care. Arch Intern Med 168: 2000-2007 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Schwartz, D. N. (2008). Procalcitonin-Guided Antibiotic Use vs a Standard Approach for Acute Respiratory Tract Infections in Primary Care. Arch Intern Med 168: 2007-2008 [Full text]  
• Bruns, A. H. W., Oosterheert, J. J., Hak, E., Hoepelman, A. I. M. (2008). Usefulness of consecutive C-reactive protein measurements in follow-up of severe community-acquired pneumonia. Eur Respir J 32: 726-732 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Lever, A., Mackenzie, I. (2007). Sepsis: definition, epidemiology, and diagnosis. BMJ 335: 879-883 [Full text]  
• Martinez, F. J., Curtis, J. L. (2007). Procalcitonin-Guided Antibiotic Therapy in COPD Exacerbations: Closer But Not Quite There. Chest 131: 1-2 [Full text]  
• Lim, W S (2007). Pandemic flu: clinical management of patients with an influenza-like illness during an influenza pandemic. Thorax 62: 1-46 [Full text]  
• Smith, E (2006). C-reactive protein in the emergency department. Emerg. Med. J. 23: 241-241 [Full text]  
• (2005). CRP: Not Much Help in Pneumonia Diagnosis. JWatch General 2005: 5-5 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

There comes the role of Physician

Raghu S Raju
bmj.com, 26 Jun 2005 [Full text]

CRP helps to exclude pneumonia

Rogier Hopstaken, et al.
bmj.com, 29 Jun 2005 [Full text]

The additional value of C reactive protein is uncertain

Victor van der Meer, et al.
bmj.com, 6 Jul 2005 [Full text]

A different look at the same data

Joshua P. Metlay
bmj.com, 7 Jul 2005 [Full text]

Shall we wait for the perfect test?

Hasse Melbye, et al.
bmj.com, 7 Jul 2005 [Full text]

Diagnostic tests and antibiotics

Anne Marie Oudesluys-Murphy, et al.
bmj.com, 12 Jul 2005 [Full text]

statistical versus clinical importance

Ueli Bollag
bmj.com, 18 Jul 2005 [Full text]

Response to Metlay and Melbye

Victor van der Meer, et al.
bmj.com, 19 Jul 2005 [Full text]

Role of CRP in neonatal infection diagnosis

zakir Shariff
bmj.com, 20 Jul 2005 [Full text]

No evidence of effect instead of evidence of no effect

Marc Jonkers
bmj.com, 30 Jul 2005 [Full text]

Ethnographic studies required

R Kumar
bmj.com, 12 Aug 2005 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>