BMJ  2005;330:1297 (4 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7503.1297

Paper

Cost utility analysis of co-prescribed heroin compared with methadone maintenance treatment in heroin addicts in two randomised trials

Marcel G W Dijkgraaf, senior researcher1, Bart P van der Zanden, researcher1, Corianne A J M de Borgie, senior researcher1, Peter Blanken, researcher2, Jan M van Ree, professor3, Wim van den Brink, professor4

1 Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J1B-216) Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2 Central Committee on the Treatment of Heroin Addicts (CCBH), Stratenum, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG Utrecht, Netherlands, 3 Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Stratenum, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG Utrecht, Netherlands, 4 Department of Psychiatry Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam

Correspondence to: M G W Dijkgraaf m.g.dijkgraaf{at}amc.uva.nl

Objective To determine the cost utility of medical co-prescription of heroin compared with methadone maintenance treatment for chronic, treatment resistant heroin addicts.

Design Cost utility analysis of two pooled open label randomised controlled trials.

Setting Methadone maintenance programmes in six cities in the Netherlands.

Participants 430 heroin addicts.

Interventions Inhalable or injectable heroin prescribed over 12 months. Methadone (maximum 150 mg a day) plus heroin (maximum 1000 mg a day) compared with methadone alone (maximum 150 mg a day). Psychosocial treatment was offered throughout.

Main outcome measures One year costs estimated from a societal perspective. Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) based on responses to the EuroQol EQ-5D at baseline and during the treatment period.

Results Co-prescription of heroin was associated with 0.058 more QALYs per patient per year (95% confidence interval 0.016 to 0.099) and a mean saving of {euro}12 793 (£8793, $16 122) ({euro}1083 to {euro}25 229) per patient per year. The higher programme costs ({euro}16 222; lower 95% confidence limit {euro}15 084) were compensated for by lower costs of law enforcement (- {euro}4129; upper 95% confidence limit - {euro}486) and damage to victims of crime (- {euro}25 374; upper 95% confidence limit - {euro}16 625). The results were robust for the use of national EQ-5D tariffs and for the exclusion of the initial implementation costs of heroin treatment. Completion of treatment is essential; having participated in any abstinence treatment in the past is not.

Conclusions Co-prescription of heroin is cost effective compared with treatment with methadone alone for chronic, treatment resistant heroin addicts.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Heroin assisted treatment
Wim van den Brink
BMJ 2009 339: b4545. [Extract] [Full Text]

Should heroin be prescribed to heroin misusers? Yes
Jürgen Rehm and Benedikt Fischer
BMJ 2008 336: 70. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Co-prescribed heroin adds value to methadone treatment
BMJ 2005 330: 0. [Full Text]

Is economic evaluation in touch with society's health values?
Joanna Coast
BMJ 2004 329: 1233-1236. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Medical prescription of heroin to treatment resistant heroin addicts: two randomised controlled trials
Wim van den Brink, Vincent M Hendriks, Peter Blanken, Maarten W J Koeter, Barbara J van Zwieten, and Jan M van Ree
BMJ 2003 327: 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Randomised trial of heroin maintenance programme for addicts who fail in conventional drug treatments
Thomas V Perneger, Francisco Giner, Miguel del Rio, and Annie Mino
BMJ 1998 317: 13-18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Brink, W. v. d. (2009). Heroin assisted treatment. BMJ 339: b4545-b4545 [Full text]  
  • Rehm, J., Fischer, B. (2008). Should heroin be prescribed to heroin misusers? Yes. BMJ 336: 70-70 [Full text]  
  • Haasen, C., Verthein, U., Degkwitz, P., Berger, J., Krausz, M., Naber, D. (2007). Heroin-assisted treatment for opioid dependence: Randomised controlled trial. Br. J. Psychiatry 191: 55-62 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Heroin trial does not allow for equivalent opioid doses
Andrew Al-Adwani
bmj.com, 3 Jun 2005 [Full text]
Heroin addiction - the broader picture!
Dr. Adil Y. Kadri
bmj.com, 3 Jun 2005 [Full text]
What patients want
David J McCartney
bmj.com, 4 Jun 2005 [Full text]
Boosted my faith in researchers
Robin Gaison
bmj.com, 6 Jun 2005 [Full text]
evidence base for abstinence based services
Jim L Barnard
bmj.com, 8 Jun 2005 [Full text]
Re: evidence base for abstinence based services
David J McCartney
bmj.com, 12 Jun 2005 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ