BMJ 2005;330:936 (23 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.38398.469479.8F (published 8 March 2005)
Paper
Model of outcomes of screening mammography: information to support informed choices
Alexandra Barratt, associate professor of epidemiology1,
Kirsten Howard, research fellow health economics1,
Les Irwig, professor of epidemiology1,
Glenn Salkeld, associate professor of health economics1,
Nehmat Houssami, clinical associate and honorary senior lecturer1
1 Screening and Test Evaluation Program, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
Correspondence to: A Barratt alexb{at}health.usyd.edu.au
Objective To provide easy to use estimates of the benefits and harms of biennial screening mammography for women aged 40, 50, 60, and 70 years.
Design Markov process model, with data from BreastScreen Australia, the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, and the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
Main outcome measure Age specific outcomes expressed per 1000 women over 10 years.
Results For every 1000 women screened over 10 years, 167-251 (depending on age) receive an abnormal result; 56-64 of these women undergo at least one biopsy, 9-26 have an invasive cancer detected by screening, and 3-6 have ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) detected by screening. More breast cancers (both invasive and DCIS) are diagnosed among screened than unscreened women. For example, among 1000 women aged 50 who have five biennial screens, 33 breast cancers are diagnosed: 28 invasive cancers (18 detected at screening and 10 interval cancers) and five DCIS (all detected at screening). By comparison, among 1000 women aged 50 who decline screening, 20 cancers are diagnosed over 10 years. There are about 0.5, 2, 3, and 2 fewer deaths from breast cancer over 10 years per 1000 women aged 40, 50, 60, and 70, respectively, who choose to be screened compared with women who decline screening at times determined by relevant policy.
Conclusion Benefits and harms of screening mammography are relatively finely balanced. Quantitative estimates such as these can be used to support individual informed choices about screening.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Related Articles
-
Informed choice for screening: implications for evaluation
- Les Irwig, Kirsten McCaffery, Glenn Salkeld, and Patrick Bossuyt
BMJ 2006 332: 1148-1150.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Ramifications of screening for breast cancer: More debate and better information still needed
- Hazel Thornton
BMJ 2006 332: 728.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
Content of invitations for publicly funded screening mammography
- Karsten Juhl Jørgensen and Peter C Gøtzsche
BMJ 2006 332: 538-541.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Model of outcomes of screening mammography: Spontaneous regression of breast cancer may not be uncommon
- Per-Henrik Zahl and Jan Mæhlen
BMJ 2005 331: 350.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
Model of outcomes of screening mammography: Information needs to support informed choices
- Peter C Gøtzsche and Karsten J Jørgensen
BMJ 2005 331: 350-351.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
Model of outcomes of screening mammography: Women's decisions about screening depend on many factors
- Sue M Lockwood, Nicola Bruce, and Rosetta Manaszewicz
BMJ 2005 331: 351.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
Improve your patients' informed consent about screening mammography
BMJ 2005 330: 0.
[Full Text]
-
Preventive medicine makes us miserable
- Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2005 330: 0.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Making decisions about mammography
- Paul Taylor
BMJ 2005 330: 915-916.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Use of decision aids to support informed choices about screening
- Alexandra Barratt, Lyndal Trevena, Heather M Davey, and Kirsten McCaffery
BMJ 2004 329: 507-510.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Incidence of breast cancer in Norway and Sweden during introduction of nationwide screening: prospective cohort study
- Per-Henrik Zahl, Bjørn Heine Strand, and Jan Mæhlen
BMJ 2004 328: 921-924.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Women need better information about routine mammography
- Hazel Thornton, Adrian Edwards, and Michael Baum
BMJ 2003 327: 101-103.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
HAGEN, S., GOODWIN, E., SINCLAIR, L.
(2008). Sitting vs Standing During Screening Mammography. radtech
79: 214-220
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Mathieu, E., Barratt, A., Davey, H. M., McGeechan, K., Howard, K., Houssami, N.
(2007). Informed Choice in Mammography Screening: A Randomized Trial of a Decision Aid for 70-Year-Old Women. Arch Intern Med
167: 2039-2046
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Irwig, L., McCaffery, K., Salkeld, G., Bossuyt, P.
(2006). Informed choice for screening: implications for evaluation.. BMJ
332: 1148-1150
[Full text]
-
Castells, X., Molins, E., Macia, F.
(2006). Cumulative false positive recall rate and association with participant related factors in a population based breast cancer screening programme.. J. Epidemiol. Community Health
60: 316-321
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Thornton, H.
(2006). Ramifications of screening for breast cancer: more debate and better information still needed.. BMJ
332: 728-728
[Full text]
-
Jorgensen, K. J., Gotzsche, P. C
(2006). Content of invitations for publicly funded screening mammography.. BMJ
332: 538-541
[Full text]
-
Baker, S. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Baglioni, P., Smith, D. W., Retsky, M. W., Demicheli, R., Hrushesky, W. J.M., Berry, D. A., Plevritis, S. K., Fryback, D. G.
(2006). Screening and breast cancer.. NEJM
354: 767-769
[Full text]
-
Lockwood, S. M, Bruce, N., Manaszewicz, R.
(2005). Model of outcomes of screening mammography: Women's decisions about screening depend on many factors. BMJ
331: 351-351
[Full text]
-
Zahl, P.-H., Maehlen, J.
(2005). Model of outcomes of screening mammography: Spontaneous regression of breast cancer may not be uncommon. BMJ
331: 350-350
[Full text]
-
Gotzsche, P. C, Jorgensen, K. J
(2005). Model of outcomes of screening mammography: Information needs to support informed choices. BMJ
331: 350-351
[Full text]
-
Taylor, P.
(2005). Making decisions about mammography. BMJ
330: 915-916
[Full text]
Rapid Responses:
Read all Rapid Responses
- Over-detection or spontaneous regression of breast cancer?
- Per-Henrik Zahl, et al.
bmj.com, 11 Mar 2005
[Full text]
- Outcomes of screening mammography: information to support informed choices
- Peter C Gøtzsche, et al.
bmj.com, 15 Mar 2005
[Full text]
- What is important to women making decisions about screening?
- Sue M Lockwood, et al.
bmj.com, 26 Apr 2005
[Full text]
- Is the desired effect of mammography screening dwindling away before our eyes?
- Friederike M. Perl
bmj.com, 6 May 2005
[Full text]
- Does screening mammography cause cancers?
- Jayant S Vaidya
bmj.com, 16 May 2005
[Full text]