BMJ  2005;330:815 (9 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.38369.437789.82 (published 18 February 2005)

Paper

Impact of misclassification of in vitro fertilisation in studies of folic acid and twinning: modelling using population based Swedish vital records

¹ National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, 1600 Clifton Road, MS E-86, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA, ² Riddarvägen 37B, 184 51, Österskär, Stockholm, Sweden

Objective To determine whether failure to adequately adjust for a reported 40% misclassification of use of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) as reported in a Swedish study could have led to a false finding that folic acid increases dizygotic twinning.

Design Modelling with population based data.

Setting Swedish vital records for 1995-9.

Main outcome measures Rates of twinning calculated according to whether women used IVF to become pregnant. Estimated unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios of the association between use of folic acid and twinning by use of IVF.

Results In 1995-9, Swedish women who used IVF had an almost 20 times the chance of having twins than women who did not use IVF (rate ratio 19.7, 95% confidence interval 18.7 to 20.6). In the absence of a true effect of folic acid, the use of a 40% misclassified surrogate variable to adjust for use of IVF would have resulted in a false finding that folic acid was associated with a more than twofold increase in twinning.

Conclusion Use of IVF is a strong confounder because it is associated with both use of folic acid and twinning. Even when misclassification of IVF was reduced to 5%, this bias persisted in the adjusted model. Using a 40% misclassified surrogate to adjust for IVF, as reported in the Swedish study, probably led to a false finding that folic acid increased dizygotic twinning.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Folic acid may not increase twinning
BMJ 2005 330: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Smith, A D., Kim, Y.-I., Refsum, H. (2008). Is folic acid good for everyone?. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 87: 517-533 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Forges, T., Monnier-Barbarino, P., Alberto, J.M., Gueant-Rodriguez, R.M., Daval, J.L., Gueant, J.L. (2007). Impact of folate and homocysteine metabolism on human reproductive health. Hum Reprod Update 13: 225-238 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Treasure, T, Utley, M (2006). Survival after resection for primary lung cancer.. Thorax 61: 649-650 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Folate supplementation and twinning

Kenneth Campbell
bmj.com, 8 Apr 2005 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more on doc2doc >>