BMJ  2005;330:284 (5 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7486.284

Paper

Mapping choice in the NHS: cross sectional study of routinely collected data

¹ Policy Directorate, King's Fund, London W1G 0AN, ² Department of Economics, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 ITH

Objective To identify where in England there are likely to be most constraints on choice of hospital for patients waiting longer than six months for elective care.

Design Cross sectional study using routinely collected data.

Setting Population of England and NHS trusts and private sector hospitals in England.

Participants All residents in England.

Main outcome measures Availability of beds (available and unoccupied hospital beds), demand (number of people waiting longer than six months), and access (travel time to facilities) to hospital care in England.

Results Most people in England already have an extensive potential choice of hospital. The number of available and unoccupied beds within 60 minutes' travel time was lowest in the Scottish borders, North Yorkshire, and parts of East Anglia, Lincolnshire, Devon, and Cornwall. This pattern was not altered by adding in private facilities. Putting demand with this supply, the number of people in a geographical area waiting longer than six months per bed within 60 minutes' travel time was highest in the south east (except London), parts of the south west (Cornwall, Bristol), East Anglia, and the Welsh border.

Conclusion People in the south east (outside London), East Anglia, and parts of the south west are likely to have to travel further to exercise meaningful choice of hospital for elective care.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Choice

Paul Bate and Glenn Robert
BMJ 2005 331: 1488-1489. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Mapping choice in the NHS: Analysis is only as good as data

Matthew Walmsley
BMJ 2005 330: 906-907. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Greener, I. (2007). Are the assumptions underlying patients choice realistic?: a review of the evidence. Br Med Bull 0: ldm024v1-10 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Bate, P., Robert, G. (2005). Choice. BMJ 331: 1488-1489 [Full text]  
• Walmsley, M. (2005). Mapping choice in the NHS: Analysis is only as good as data. BMJ 330: 906-907 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Analysis only as good as the data

Matthew Walmsley
bmj.com, 7 Feb 2005 [Full text]

Trust addresses not enough

John R. Davies
bmj.com, 10 Feb 2005 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>