Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:223 (29 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.38308.477650.63 (published 21 December 2004)
S Darby, professor of medical statistics1,
D Hill, statistician1,
A Auvinen, professor of epidemiology2,
J M Barros-Dios, professor of epidemiology3,
H Baysson, statistician4,
F Bochicchio, senior researcher5,
H Deo, statistician6,
R Falk, principal scientist7,
F Forastiere, professor of epidemiology8,
M Hakama, professor of epidemiology9,
I Heid, statistician10,
L Kreienbrock, professor of statistics11,
M Kreuzer, epidemiologist12,
F Lagarde, statistician13,
I Mäkeläinen, health physicist14,
C Muirhead, statistician15,
W Oberaigner, epidemiologist16,
G Pershagen, professor of environmental medicine13,
A Ruano-Ravina, professor of epidemiology3,
E Ruosteenoja, scientist14,
A Schaffrath Rosario, statistician10,
M Tirmarche, epidemiologist4,
L Tomá
ek, statistician17,
E Whitley, visiting lecturer in medical statistics18,
H-E Wichmann, professor of epidemiology10,
R Doll, emeritus professor of medicine1
1 Clinical Trials Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, 2 School of Public Health, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland, 3 Area of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 4 Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Direction de la Radioprotection de l'Homme, Service de Radiobiologie et d'Epidémiologie, Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France, 5 Unit of Radioactivity and its Health Effects, Department of Technology and Health, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy, 6 Department of Applied Statistics, University of Reading, Reading RG6 2AL, 7 Swedish Radiation Protection Authority, SE-171 16, Stockholm, Sweden, 8 Department of Epidemiology, Rome E Health Authority, Rome, Italy, 9 Finnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki, Finland, 10 Institute of Epidemiology, GSF Research Centre for Environment and Health, Neuherberg, Germany, 11 Institute of Biometry, Epidemiology and Information Processing, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Germany, 12 Department of Radiation Protection and Health, Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Neuherberg, Germany, 13 Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, S-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden, 14 STUK-Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, Helsinki, Finland, 15 National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton, Didcot OX11 0RQ, 16 Tumorregister Tirol, Innsbruck, Austria, 17 Epidemiology Unit, National Radiation Protection Institute, Prague, Czech Republic, 18 Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR
Correspondence to: S Darby sarah.darby{at}ctsu.ox.ac.uk
Objective To determine the risk of lung cancer associated with exposure at home to the radioactive disintegration products of naturally occurring radon gas
Design Collaborative analysis of individual data from 13 case-control studies of residential radon and lung cancer.
Setting Nine European countries.
Subjects 7148 cases of lung cancer and 14 208 controls.
Main outcome measures Relative risks of lung cancer and radon gas concentrations in homes inhabited during the previous 5-34 years measured in becquerels (radon disintegrations per second) per cubic metre (Bq/m3) of household air.
Results The mean measured radon concentration in homes of people in the control group was 97 Bq/m3, with 11% measuring > 200 and 4% measuring > 400 Bq/m3. For cases of lung cancer the mean concentration was 104 Bq/m3. The risk of lung cancer increased by 8.4% (95% confidence interval 3.0% to 15.8%) per 100 Bq/m3 increase in measured radon (P = 0.0007). This corresponds to an increase of 16% (5% to 31%) per 100 Bq/m3 increase in usual radonthat is, after correction for the dilution caused by random uncertainties in measuring radon concentrations. The dose-response relation seemed to be linear with no threshold and remained significant (P = 0.04) in analyses limited to individuals from homes with measured radon < 200 Bq/m3. The proportionate excess risk did not differ significantly with study, age, sex, or smoking. In the absence of other causes of death, the absolute risks of lung cancer by age 75 years at usual radon concentrations of 0, 100, and 400 Bq/m3 would be about 0.4%, 0.5%, and 0.7%, respectively, for lifelong non-smokers, and about 25 times greater (10%, 12%, and 16%) for cigarette smokers.
Conclusions Collectively, though not separately, these studies show appreciable hazards from residential radon, particularly for smokers and recent ex-smokers, and indicate that it is responsible for about 2% of all deaths from cancer in Europe.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses