BMJ  2004;329:371 (14 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.38169.519653.EB (published 4 August 2004)

Paper

Prospective randomised controlled trial of an infection screening programme to reduce the rate of preterm delivery

¹ Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Vienna Medical School, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria

Objective To evaluate whether a screening strategy in pregnancy lowers the rate of preterm delivery in a general population of pregnant women.

Design Multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial.

Setting Non-hospital based antenatal clinics.

Participants 4429 pregnant women presenting for their routine prenatal visits early in the second trimester were screened by Gram stain for asymptomatic vaginal infection. In the intervention group, the women's obstetricians received the test results and women received standard treatment and follow up for any detected infection. In the control group, the results of the vaginal smears were not revealed to the caregivers.

Main outcome measures The primary outcome variable was preterm delivery at less than 37 weeks. Secondary outcome variables were preterm delivery at less than 37 weeks combined with different birth weight categories equal to or below 2500 g and the rate of late miscarriage.

Results Outcome data were available for 2058 women in the intervention group and 2097 women in the control group. In the intervention group, the number of preterm births was significantly lower than in the control group (3.0% v 5.3%, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 3.6; P = 0.0001). Preterm births were also significantly reduced in lower weight categories at less than 37 weeks and 2500 g. Eight late miscarriages occurred in the intervention group and 15 in the control group.

Conclusion Integrating a simple infection screening programme into routine antenatal care leads to a significant reduction in preterm births and reduces the rate of late miscarriage in a general population of pregnant women.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Screening for vaginal infections halves preterm births
BMJ 2004 329: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

Does screening reduce preterm births?

Anna Alanen
BMJ 2004 329: 374. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Nygren, P., Fu, R., Freeman, M., Bougatsos, C., Klebanoff, M., Guise, J.-M. (2008). Evidence on the Benefits and Harms of Screening and Treating Pregnant Women Who Are Asymptomatic for Bacterial Vaginosis: An Update Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. ANN INTERN MED 148: 220-233 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Tsatsaris, V., Azria, E., Goffinet, F., Morrison, E. A.B., Cushman, L. F., Simhan, H. N., Caritis, S. N. (2007). Prevention of Preterm Delivery. NEJM 357: 1979-1980 [Full text]  
• Eckert, L. O. (2006). Acute Vulvovaginitis. NEJM 355: 1244-1252 [Full text]  
• Tann, C J, Mpairwe, H, Morison, L, Nassimu, K, Hughes, P, Omara, M, Mabey, D, Muwanga, M, Grosskurth, H, Elliott, A M (2006). Lack of effectiveness of syndromic management in targeting vaginal infections in pregnancy in Entebbe, Uganda.. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: 285-289 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Honest, H., Khan, K. S (2005). Antenatal infection screening reduced preterm delivery. Evid. Based Med. 10: 47-47 [Full text]  
• (2005). Lucina. Arch. Dis. Child. 90: 220-220 [Full text]  
• Alanen, A. (2004). Does screening reduce preterm births?. BMJ 329: 374-374 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Implications for the economic evaluation of other screening programmes e.g. for chlamydia.

Woody Caan
bmj.com, 5 Aug 2004 [Full text]

Ethical Approval?

James Crick
bmj.com, 23 Aug 2004 [Full text]

Study design

HELMUT SCHUSTER
bmj.com, 25 Aug 2004 [Full text]

The value of CONSORT in interpreting dramatic findings

Helen J Stokes-Lampard, et al.
bmj.com, 8 Sep 2004 [Full text]

Does screening reduce preterm births?

Austin HN Ugwumadu, et al.
bmj.com, 9 Sep 2004 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more>>