BMJ  2004;329:136 (17 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.38155.585046.63 (published 7 July 2004)

Paper

Effect of joint crisis plans on use of compulsory treatment in psychiatry: single blind randomised controlled trial

Claire Henderson, MRC special training fellow in health services research1, Chris Flood, research assistant1, Morven Leese, statistician1, Graham Thornicroft, professor of community psychiatry1, Kim Sutherby, consultant psychiatrist2, George Szmukler, dean3

1 Health Services Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, 2 South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, Croydon CR0 1XT, 3 Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London

Correspondence to: C Henderson hendersc{at}nypdrat.cpmc.columbia.edu

Objective To investigate whether a form of advance agreement for people with severe mental illness can reduce the use of inpatient services and compulsory admission or treatment.

Design Single blind randomised controlled trial, with randomisation of individual patients. The investigator was blind to allocation.

Setting Eight community mental health teams in southern England.

Participants 160 people with an operational diagnosis of psychotic illness or non-psychotic bipolar disorder who had experienced a hospital admission within the previous two years.

Intervention The joint crisis plan was formulated by the patient, care coordinator, psychiatrist, and project worker and contained contact information, details of mental and physical illnesses, treatments, indicators for relapse, and advance statements of preferences for care in the event of future relapse.

Main outcome measures Admission to hospital, bed days, and use of the Mental Health Act over 15 month follow up.

Results Use of the Mental Health Act was significantly reduced for the intervention group, 13% (10/80) of whom experienced compulsory admission or treatment compared with 27% (21/80) of the control group (risk ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.24 to 0.95, P = 0.028). As a consequence, the mean number of days of detention (days spent as an inpatient while under a section of the Mental Health Act) for the whole intervention group was 14 compared with 31 for the control group (difference 16, 0 to 36, P = 0.04). For those admitted under a section of the Mental Health Act, the number of days of detention was similar in the two groups (means 114 and 117, difference 3, -61 to 67, P = 0.98). The intervention group had fewer admissions (risk ratio 0.69, 0.45 to 1.04, P = 0.07). There was no evidence for differences in bed days (total number of days spent as an inpatient) (means 32 and 36, difference 4, -18 to 26, P = 0.15 for the whole sample; means 107 and 83, difference -24, -72 to 24, P = 0.39 for those admitted).

Conclusions Use of joint crisis plans reduced compulsory admissions and treatment in patients with severe mental illness. The reduction in overall admission was less. This is the first structured clinical intervention that seems to reduce compulsory admission and treatment in mental health services.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Joint crisis plans for people with psychosis: economic evaluation of a randomised controlled trial
Chris Flood, Sarah Byford, Claire Henderson, Morven Leese, Graham Thornicroft, Kim Sutherby, and George Szmukler
BMJ 2006 333: 729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Agreeing a treatment plan cuts hospital detentions
BMJ 2004 329: 0. [Full Text]

Compulsion and psychiatry—the role of advance statements
Philip Thomas and Anne B Cahill
BMJ 2004 329: 122-123. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Owen, G. S., David, A. S., Hayward, P., Richardson, G., Szmukler, G., Hotopf, M. (2009). Retrospective views of psychiatric in-patients regaining mental capacity. Br. J. Psychiatry 195: 403-407 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Gray, R., Spilling, R., Burgess, D., Newey, T. (2009). Antipsychotic long-acting injections in clinical practice: medication management and patient choice. Br. J. Psychiatry 195: S51-S56 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Bowers, L. (2009). Association Between Staff Factors and Levels of Conflict and Containment on Acute Psychiatric Wards in England. Psychiatr. Serv. 60: 231-239 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Harrison, T., Davis, R. (2009). Advocacy: time to communicate. Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 15: 57-64 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Henderson, C., Swanson, J. W., Szmukler, G., Thornicroft, G., Zinkler, M. (2008). A Typology of Advance Statements in Mental Health Care. Psychiatr. Serv. 59: 63-71 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Schrank, B., Slade, M. (2007). Recovery in psychiatry. Psychiatr. Bull. 31: 321-325 [Full text]  
  • Foy, J., MacRae, A., Thom, A., Macharouthu, A. (2007). Advance statements: survey of patients' views and understanding. Psychiatr. Bull. 31: 339-341 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • SLADE, M., PINFOLD, V., RAPAPORT, J., BELLRINGER, S., BANERJEE, S., KUIPERS, E., HUXLEY, P. (2007). Best practice when service users do not consent to sharing information with carers: National multimethod study. Br. J. Psychiatry 190: 148-155 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Henderson, C., Flood, C., Szmukler, G. (2007). . Psychiatr. Serv. 58: 139-140 [Full text]  
  • Holloway, F. (2007). Choice: wake up and smell the coffee!: INVITED COMMENTARY ON... CHOICE IN MENTAL HEALTH. Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 13: 68-69 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Flood, C., Byford, S., Henderson, C., Leese, M., Thornicroft, G., Sutherby, K., Szmukler, G. (2006). Joint crisis plans for people with psychosis: economic evaluation of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 333: 729- [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Szmukler, G., Dawson, J. (2006). Commentary: Toward Resolving Some Dilemmas Concerning Psychiatric Advance Directives. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 34: 398-401 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Zinkler, M., Amering, M., Stastny, P., Hopper, K. (2005). Advance directives and advance agreements * Authors' reply:. Br. J. Psychiatry 187: 388-389 [Full text]  
  • Kingdon, D., Amanullah, S. (2005). Care programme approach: relapsing or recovering?: REVISITING... MAKING CARE PROGRAMMING WORK. Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 11: 325-329 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Lester, H. (2005). Shared care for people with mental illness: a GP's perspective. Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 11: 133-139 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Burns, T. (2005). Shared care, individual expertise: INVITED COMMENTARY ON... SHARED CARE FOR PEOPLE WITH MENTAL ILLNESS. Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 11: 139-141 [Full text]  
  • Kisely, S. (2005). A joint crisis plan negotiated with mental health staff significantly reduces compulsory admission and treatment in people with severe mental illness. Evid. Based Ment. Health 8: 17-17 [Full text]  
  • Thomas, P., Cahill, A. B (2004). Compulsion and psychiatry--the role of advance statements. BMJ 329: 122-123 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Effectiveness of joint crisis plans in psychiatry.
Dr. Naseem A. Qureshi MD, IMAPA, LMIPS
bmj.com, 17 Jul 2004 [Full text]
Joint crisis plans: how do they reduce compulsory admission?
Robert H Chaplin
bmj.com, 28 Jul 2004 [Full text]
Advance planning in mental health
Jacqueline M Atkinson
bmj.com, 30 Jul 2004 [Full text]
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ