BMJ  2004;328:1410 (12 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.38097.590810.7C (published 28 May 2004)

Paper

Rates of caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery in nulliparous women after low concentration epidural infusions or opioid analgesia: systematic review

¹ Department of Anaesthesia, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074, ² Department of Obstetric Anaesthesia, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore

Objective To compare the effects of low concentration epidural infusions of bupivacaine with parenteral opioid analgesia on rates of caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.

Data sources Medline, Embase, the Cochrane controlled trials register, and handsearching of the International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia.

Study selection Randomised controlled trials comparing low concentration epidural infusions with parenteral opioids.

Data synthesis Seven trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Epidural analgesia does not seem to be associated with an increased risk of caesarean section (odds ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 1.48) but may be associated with an increased risk of instrumental vaginal delivery (2.11, 0.95 to 4.65). Epidural analgesia was associated with a longer second stage of labour (weighted mean difference 15.2 minutes, 2.1 to 28.2 minutes). More women randomised to receive epidural analgesia had adequate pain relief, with fewer changing to parenteral opioids than vice versa (odds ratio 0.1, 0.05 to 0.22).

Conclusions Epidural analgesia using low concentration infusions of bupivacaine is unlikely to increase the risk of caesarean section but may increase the risk of instrumental vaginal delivery. Although women receiving epidural analgesia had a longer second stage of labour, they had better pain relief.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Good news is often ignored

Felicity Reynolds
BMJ 2004 329: 293. [Extract] [Full Text]

Epidural analgesia does not increase risk of caesarean intervention
BMJ 2004 328: 0. [Full Text]

Do mistakes matter?

Kamran Abbasi
BMJ 2004 328: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Salim, R., Nachum, Z., Moscovici, R., Lavee, M., Shalev, E. (2005). Continuous Compared With Intermittent Epidural Infusion on Progress of Labor and Patient Satisfaction. Obstet Gynecol 106: 301-306 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• (2004). 23 Apr 2004 to 23 Jul 2004. Evid. Based Nurs. 7: e4-e4 [Full text]  
• (2004). Other articles noted. Evid. Based Med. 9: e5-e5 [Full text]  
• Reynolds, F. (2004). Good news is often ignored. BMJ 329: 293-293 [Full text]  
• (2004). Epidural Analgesia During Labor Doesn't Increase Risk for Cesarean Section. JWatch General 2004: 3-3 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Good news is often ignored

FELICITY REYNOLDS
bmj.com, 20 Jun 2004 [Full text]

Epidurals need more monitoring

Hitesh Patel, et al.
bmj.com, 23 Jun 2004 [Full text]