BMJ  2004;328:1350-1353 (5 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.38117.624259.55 (published 19 May 2004)

Paper

Authors' perceptions of electronic publishing: two cross sectional surveys

¹ BMJ Editorial Office, BMA House, London WC1H 9JR

Objectives To evaluate how acceptable authors find the BMJ's current practice of publishing short versions of research articles in the paper journal and a longer version on the web and to determine authors' attitudes towards publishing only abstracts in the paper journal and publishing unedited versions on bmj.com once papers have been accepted for publication.

Design Two cross sectional surveys.

Setting General medical journal.

Participants Survey 1: corresponding authors of a consecutive sample of published BMJ research articles that had undergone the ELPS (electronic long, paper short) process. Survey 2: corresponding authors of consecutive research articles submitted to BMJ.

Results Response rates were 90% (104/115) in survey 1 and 75% (213/283) in survey 2. ELPS is largely acceptable to BMJ authors, but there is some concern that electronic information is not permanent and uncertainty about how versions are referenced. While authors who had experienced ELPS reported some problems with editors shortening papers, most were able to rectify these. Overall, 70% thought that the BMJ should continue to use ELPS; 49% thought that publishing just the abstract in the printed journal with the full version only on bmj.com was unacceptable; and 23% thought it unacceptable to post unedited versions on bmj.com once a paper had been accepted for publication.

Conclusions It is acceptable to authors to publish short versions of research articles in the printed version of a general medical journal with longer versions on the website. Authors dislike the idea of publishing only abstracts in the printed journal but are in favour of posting accepted articles on the website ahead of the printed version.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Innovations in publishing BMJ research

Trish Groves and Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2008 337: a3123. [Extract] [Full Text]

Evidence based publishing

Leanne Tite and Sara Schroter
BMJ 2006 333: 366. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

ELPS is the way forward
BMJ 2004 328: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Groves, T., Godlee, F. (2008). Innovations in publishing BMJ research. BMJ 337: a3123-a3123 [Full text]  
• Tite, L., Schroter, S. (2006). Evidence based publishing. BMJ 333: 366-366 [Full text]  
• Mohassel, M. R. (2006). Web-extended publishing with AJHP.. Am J Health Syst Pharm 63: 1495-1495 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Disinterested Authors

Jaiganesh.K. Viswambharan
bmj.com, 7 Jun 2004 [Full text]

Authors' perceptions of electronic publishing

Akheel A Syed
bmj.com, 14 Jun 2004 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>