BMJ  2004;328:1293 (29 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7451.1293

Primary care

Psychological impact of human papillomavirus testing in women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear test results: cross sectional questionnaire study

¹ Health Psychology Section, Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, ² Institute of Cancer Research, Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, ³ Health Economics Research Centre, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF

Objective To describe the psychological impact on women of being tested for human papillomavirus (HPV) when smear test results are borderline or mildly dyskaryotic.

Design Cross sectional questionnaire study.

Setting Two centres participating in an English pilot study of HPV testing in women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic smear test results.

Participants Women receiving borderline or mildly dyskaryotic smear test results tested for HPV and found to be HPV positive (n = 536) or HPV negative (n = 331); and women not tested for HPV with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic smear results (n = 143) or normal smear results (n = 366).

Main outcome measures State anxiety, distress, and concern about test result, assessed within four weeks of receipt of results.

Results Women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic smear results who were HPV positive were more anxious, distressed, and concerned than the other three groups. Three variables independently predicted anxiety in HPV positive women: younger age ( = -0.11, P = 0.03), higher perceived risk of cervical cancer ( = 0.17, P < 0.001), and reporting that they did not understand the meaning of test results ( = 0.17, P = 0.001). Testing HPV negative was not reassuring: among women with abnormal smear test results, those who were HPV negative were no less anxious than those who were not tested for HPV.

Conclusions Informing women more effectively about the meaning of borderline or mildly dyskaryotic smear test results and HPV status, in particular about the absolute risks of cervical cancer and the prevalence of HPV infection, may avoid some anxiety for those who are HPV positive while achieving some reassurance for those who test HPV negative.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

A negative test for human papillomavirus may not reassure
BMJ 2004 328: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Mitchell, S., Hall, V. P. (2009). Women's Initial Experience of Abnormal Papanicolaou Smear. J Holist Nurs 27: 93-102 [Abstract]  
• Goldsmith, M R, Austoker, J, Marsh, G, Kehoe, S T, Bankhead, C R (2008). Cervical screening result communication: a focus-group investigation of English women's experiences and needs. Qual Saf Health Care 17: 334-338 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Insinga, R. P., Dasbach, E. J., Elbasha, E. H., Liaw, K.-L., Barr, E. (2007). Incidence and Duration of Cervical Human Papillomavirus 6, 11, 16, and 18 Infections in Young Women: An Evaluation from Multiple Analytic Perspectives. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 16: 709-715 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Bulkmans, N W J, Bulk, S, Ottevanger, M S, Rozendaal, L, Hellenberg, S M, van Kemenade, F J, Snijders, P J F, Boeke, A J P, Meijer, C J L M (2006). Implementation of human papillomavirus testing in cervical screening without a concomitant decrease in participation rate. J. Clin. Pathol. 59: 1218-1220 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Sharp, L, Cotton, S C, Alexander, L, Williams, E, Gray, N M, Reid, J M (2006). Reasons for participation and non-participation in a randomized controlled trial: postal questionnaire surveys of women eligible for TOMBOLA (Trial Of Management of Borderline and Other Low-grade Abnormal smears). Clin Trials 3: 431-442 [Abstract]  
• McCaffery, K, Waller, J, Nazroo, J, Wardle, J (2006). Social and psychological impact of HPV testing in cervical screening: a qualitative study.. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: 169-174 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Sawaya, G. F. (2005). A 21-Year-Old Woman With Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance. JAMA 294: 2210-2218 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Psychological impact of cervical screening: a consequence of poor understanding and awareness?

Ranjit Manchanda, et al.
bmj.com, 8 Jun 2004 [Full text]

Psychological impact of human papillomavirus testing: could management strategy play a role?

Jo Waller, et al.
bmj.com, 10 Jun 2004 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>