Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:1110 (8 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.38043.414074.EE (published 23 April 2004)
F A McAlister, associate professor1, N F Murphy, research fellow2, C R Simpson, research fellow3, S Stewart, professor4, K MacIntyre, specialist registrar5, M Kirkpatrick, information analyst6, J Chalmers, consultant in public health medicine6, A Redpath, statistician6, S Capewell, professor of clinical epidemiology7, J J V McMurray, professor2
1 Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2R7, 2 Department of Cardiology, Western Infirmary, Glasgow G12 8QQ, 3 Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Aberdeen AB25 2AY, 4 Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, 5000, Australia, 5 Department of Public Health, University of Glasgow G12 8RZ, 6 The information and Statistics Division, Edinburgh EH5 3SQ, 7 Department of Public Health, University of Liverpool L69 3GB
Correspondence to: J J V McMurray j.mcmurray{at}bio.gla.ac.uk
Objective To examine whether there are socioeconomic gradients in the incidence, prevalence, treatment, and follow up of patients with heart failure in primary care.
Design Population based study.
Setting 53 general practices (307 741 patients) participating in the Scottish continuous morbidity recording project between 1April 1999 and 31 March 2000.
Participants 2186 adults with heart failure.
Main outcome measures Comorbid diagnoses, frequency of visits to general practitioner, and prescribed drugs.
Results 2186 patients with heart failure were seen (prevalence 7.1 per 1000 population, incidence 2.0 per 1000 population). The age and sex standardised incidence of heart failure increased with greater socioeconomic deprivation, from 1.8 per 1000 population in the most affluent stratum to 2.6 per 1000 population in the most deprived stratum (odds ratio 1.44, P = 0.0003). On average, patients were seen 2.4 times yearly, but follow up rates were less frequent with increasing socioeconomic deprivation (from 2.6 yearly in the most affluent subgroup to 2.0 yearly in the most deprived subgroup, P = 0.00009). Overall, 812 (80.6%) patients were prescribed diuretics, 396 (39.3%) angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, 216 (21.4%)
blockers, 208 (20.7%) digoxin, and 86 (8.5%) spironolactone. The wide discrepancies in prescribing between different general practices disappeared after adjustment for patient age and sex. Prescribing patterns did not vary by deprivation categories on univariate or multivariate analyses.
Conclusions Compared with affluent patients, socioeconomically deprived patients were 44% more likely to develop heart failure but 23% less likely to see their general practitioner on an ongoing basis. Prescribed treatment did not differ across socioeconomic gradients.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses
UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care