Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:687-691 (20 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7441.687
David Bruce, director of postgraduate general practice education1, Katie Phillips, project officer1, Ross Reid, associate adviser1, David Snadden, professor2, Ronald Harden, professor of medical education3
1 NHS Education for Scotland, Tayside Centre for General Practice, Dundee DD2 4AD, 2 Northern Medical Program, Universities of Northern British Colombia and British Colombia, Prince George, BC, Canada V2N 4Z9, 3 Centre for Medical Education, University of Dundee, Dundee
Correspondence to: D Bruce d.bruce{at}tcgp.dundee.ac.uk
Objective To compare two models of revalidation for general practitioners.
Design Randomised comparison of two revalidation models.
Setting Primary care in Tayside, Scotland.
Participants 66 Tayside general practitioners (principals and non-principals), 53 of whom completed the revalidation folders.
Interventions Two revalidation models: a minimum criterion based model with revalidation as the primary purpose, and an educational outcome model with emphasis on combining revalidation with continuing professional development.
Main outcome measures Feasibility and acceptability of each approach and effect on the doctor's continuing professional development. The ability to make a summative judgment on completed models and whether either model would allow patient groups to have confidence in the revalidation process.
Results The criterion model was preferred by general practitioners. For both models doctors reported making changes to their practice and felt a positive effect on their continuing professional development. Summative assessment of the folders showed reasonable inter-rater reliability.
Conclusions The criterion model provides a practical and acceptable model for general practitioners to use when preparing for revalidation.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses