BMJ  2004;328:687-691 (20 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7441.687

Learning in practice

Revalidation for general practitioners: randomised comparison of two revalidation models

David Bruce, director of postgraduate general practice education1, Katie Phillips, project officer1, Ross Reid, associate adviser1, David Snadden, professor2, Ronald Harden, professor of medical education3

1 NHS Education for Scotland, Tayside Centre for General Practice, Dundee DD2 4AD, 2 Northern Medical Program, Universities of Northern British Colombia and British Colombia, Prince George, BC, Canada V2N 4Z9, 3 Centre for Medical Education, University of Dundee, Dundee

Correspondence to: D Bruce d.bruce{at}tcgp.dundee.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective To compare two models of revalidation for general practitioners.

Design Randomised comparison of two revalidation models.

Setting Primary care in Tayside, Scotland.

Participants 66 Tayside general practitioners (principals and non-principals), 53 of whom completed the revalidation folders.

Interventions Two revalidation models: a minimum criterion based model with revalidation as the primary purpose, and an educational outcome model with emphasis on combining revalidation with continuing professional development.

Main outcome measures Feasibility and acceptability of each approach and effect on the doctor's continuing professional development. The ability to make a summative judgment on completed models and whether either model would allow patient groups to have confidence in the revalidation process.

Results The criterion model was preferred by general practitioners. For both models doctors reported making changes to their practice and felt a positive effect on their continuing professional development. Summative assessment of the folders showed reasonable inter-rater reliability.

Conclusions The criterion model provides a practical and acceptable model for general practitioners to use when preparing for revalidation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Regulation of doctors
David A Bruce
BMJ 2007 334: 436-437. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Revalidation: swallow hard
Geoff Wong
BMJ 2004 328: 1077. [Extract] [Full Text]

KISS, say GPs
BMJ 2004 328: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Bruce, D. A (2007). Regulation of doctors. BMJ 334: 436-437 [Full text]  
  • Wong, G. (2004). Revalidation: swallow hard. BMJ 328: 1077-1077 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

What happened to English?
|Bernard Leary
bmj.com, 19 Mar 2004 [Full text]
Re: What happened to English?
Sam Lewis
bmj.com, 20 Mar 2004 [Full text]
Swallow hard
Geoff Wong
bmj.com, 23 Mar 2004 [Full text]
The best revalidation
Francesco Carelli
bmj.com, 28 Mar 2004 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ