BMJ  2004;328:487 (28 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.37972.678345.0D (published 9 February 2004)

Paper

Adenoidectomy versus chemoprophylaxis and placebo for recurrent acute otitis media in children aged under 2 years: randomised controlled trial

¹ University of Oulu, PO Box 5000, FIN-90014, Finland

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of adenoidectomy compared with long term chemoprophylaxis and placebo in the prevention of recurrent acute otitis media in children aged between 10 months and 2 years.

Design Randomised, double blind, controlled trial.

Setting Oulu University Hospital, a tertiary centre in Finland.

Participants 180 children aged 10 months to 2 years with recurrent acute otitis media.

Intervention Adenoidectomy, sulfafurazole (sulphisoxazole) 50 mg/kg body weight, given once a day for six months or placebo. Follow up lasted for two years, during which time all symptoms and episodes of acute otitis media were recorded.

Main outcome measures Intervention failure (two episodes in two months or three in six months or persistent effusion) during follow up, number of episodes of acute otitis media, number of visits to a doctor because of any infection, and antibiotic prescriptions Number of prescriptions, and days with symptoms of respiratory infection.

Results Compared with placebo, interventions failed during both the first six months and the rest of the follow up period of 24 months similarly in the adenoidectomy and chemoprophylaxis groups (at six months the differences in risk were 10% (95% confidence interval -9% to 29%) and 18% (-2% to 38%), respectively). No significant differences were observed between the groups in the numbers of episodes of acute otitis media, visits to a doctor, antibiotic prescriptions, and days with symptoms of respiratory infection.

Conclusions Adenoidectomy, as the first surgical treatment of children aged 10 to 24 months with recurrent acute otitis media, is not effective in preventing further episodes. It cannot be recommended as the primary method of prophylaxis.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Confidence intervals illuminate absence of evidence

Doug Altman and J Martin Bland
BMJ 2004 328: 1016-1017. [Extract] [Full Text]

Adenoidectomy does not reduce recurrent otitis in young children
BMJ 2004 328: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

What doesn't work and how to show it

Phil Alderson and Trish Groves
BMJ 2004 328: 473. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Hammaren-Malmi, S., Saxen, H., Tarkkanen, J., Mattila, P. S. (2005). Adenoidectomy Does Not Significantly Reduce the Incidence of Otitis Media in Conjunction With the Insertion of Tympanostomy Tubes in Children Who Are Younger Than 4 Years: A Randomized Trial. Pediatrics 116: 185-189 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• (2004). Other articles noted. Evid. Based Med. 9: e5-e5 [Full text]  
• (2004). Lucina. Arch. Dis. Child. 89: 892-892 [Full text]  
• (2004). Other articles noted: 06 Feb 2004 to 16 Apr 2004. Evid. Based Nurs. 7: e3-e3 [Full text]  
• Altman, D., Bland, J M. (2004). Confidence intervals illuminate absence of evidence. BMJ 328: 1016-1017 [Full text]  
• (2004). Recurrent AOM: Is Adenoidectomy the Answer?. JWatch General 2004: 4-4 [Full text]  
• Alderson, P., Groves, T. (2004). What doesn't work and how to show it. BMJ 328: 473-473 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

adenoidectomy!

zia.s rizvi, et al.
bmj.com, 2 Mar 2004 [Full text]

If it doesn´t work, stop it; but working for what?

Erkki V.M. Hopsu
bmj.com, 5 Mar 2004 [Full text]

Erroneous outcome measure

Valerie J. Brousseau, et al.
bmj.com, 10 Mar 2004 [Full text]

Surgical Beakthrough?

Graham, J. C. Smelt
bmj.com, 15 Mar 2004 [Full text]

oter preventive methods

Reber M. kalila al sufig
bmj.com, 12 Jun 2004 [Full text]