BMJ  2004;328:258 (31 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.37963.691632.44 (published 23 January 2004)

Paper

Comparability of self rated health: cross sectional multi-country survey using anchoring vignettes

¹ Department of Population and International Health, Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard School of Public Health, 9 Bow Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA, ² Harvard University Global Health Initiative, 104 Mt. Auburn Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA

Objective To examine differences in expectations for health using anchoring vignettes, which describe fixed levels of health on dimensions such as mobility.

Design Cross sectional survey of adults living in the community.

Setting China, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Turkey, and United Arab Emirates.

Participants 3012 men and women aged 18 years and older (self ratings); subsample of 406 (vignette ratings).

Main outcome measures Self rated mobility levels and ratings of hypothetical vignettes using the same questions and response categories.

Results Consistent rankings of vignettes are evidence that vignettes are understood in similar ways in different settings, and internal consistency of orderings on two mobility questions indicates good comprehension. Variation in vignette ratings across age groups suggests that expectations for mobility decline with age. Comparison of responses to two different mobility questions supports the assumption that individual ratings of hypothetical vignettes relate to expectations for health in similar ways as self assessments.

Conclusions Anchoring vignettes could provide a powerful tool for understanding and adjusting for the influence of different health expectations on self ratings of health. Incorporating anchoring vignettes in surveys can improve the comparability of self reported measures.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Self reported health and mortality: ecological analysis based on electoral wards across the United Kingdom

Dermot O'Reilly, Michael Rosato, and Chris Patterson
BMJ 2005 331: 938-939. [Full Text] [PDF]

Vignettes make self reported questionnaire comparable
BMJ 2004 328: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Delgado, A, Andres Lopez-Fernandez, L, de Dios Luna, J, Gil, N, Jimenez, M, Puga, A (2008). Patient expectations are not always the same. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 62: 427-434 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Quesnel Vallee, A. (2007). Self-rated health: caught in the crossfire of the quest for 'true' health?. Int J Epidemiol 36: 1161-1164 [Full text]  
• Huisman, M., van Lenthe, F., Mackenbach, J. (2007). The predictive ability of self-assessed health for mortality in different educational groups. Int J Epidemiol 36: 1207-1213 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• CASTRO-COSTA, E., DEWEY, M., STEWART, R., BANERJEE, S., HUPPERT, F., MENDONCA-LIMA, C., BULA, C., REISCHES, F., WANCATA, J., RITCHIE, K., TSOLAKI, M., MATEOS, R., PRINCE, M. (2007). Prevalence of depressive symptoms and syndromes in later life in ten European countries: The SHARE study. Br. J. Psychiatry 191: 393-401 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Hyde, M., Jakub, H., Melchior, M., Van Oort, F., Weyers, S. (2006). Comparison of the effects of low childhood socioeconomic position and low adulthood socioeconomic position on self rated health in four European studies.. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 60: 882-886 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• O'Reilly, D., Rosato, M., Patterson, C. (2005). Self reported health and mortality: ecological analysis based on electoral wards across the United Kingdom. BMJ 331: 938-939 [Full text]  
• Bowling, A. (2005). Just one question: If one question works, why ask several?. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 59: 342-345 [Full text]