BMJ  2003;327:1251 (29 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7426.1251

Paper

Randomised controlled trial of treatment of unilateral visual impairment detected at preschool vision screening

¹ Department of Ophthalmology, School of Neurobiology, Neurology and Psychiatry, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle NE2 4HH, ² PEACH Unit, Department of Child Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G3 8SJ, ³ Orthoptic Department, Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle NE1 4LP

Objectives To test the efficacy of treatment for unilateral visual loss detected by preschool vision screening and the extent to which effectiveness varies with initial severity.

Design Randomised controlled trial of full treatment with glasses and patching, if required, compared with glasses only or no treatment. Masked assessment of best corrected acuity after one year of follow up.

Setting Eight UK eye departments.

Participants 177 children aged 3-5 years with mild to moderate unilateral impairment of acuity (6/9 to 6/36) detected by screening.

Results Children in the full and glasses treatment groups had incrementally better visual acuity at follow up than children who received no treatment, but the mean treatment effect between full and no treatment was equivalent to only one line on a Snellen chart (0.11 log units; 95% confidence interval 0.050 to 0.171; P < 0.0001). The effects of treatment depended on initial acuity: full treatment showed a substantial effect in the moderate acuity group (6/36 to 6/18 at recruitment) and no significant effect in the mild acuity group (6/9 to 6/12 at recruitment) (P = 0.006 for linear regression interaction term). For 64 children with moderate acuity loss the treatment effect was 0.20 log units, equivalent to one to two lines on a Snellen chart. When all children had received treatment, six months after the end of the trial, there was no significant difference in acuity between the groups.

Conclusions Treatment is worth while in children with the poorest acuity, but in children with mild (6/9 to 6/12) unilateral acuity loss there was little benefit. Delay in treatment until the age of 5 did not seem to influence effectiveness.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Does amblyopia affect educational, health, and social outcomes? Findings from 1958 British birth cohort

J S Rahi, P M Cumberland, and C S Peckham
BMJ 2006 332: 820-825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Children with mild ambylopia may not need treatment
BMJ 2003 327: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

The NHS experiment

Kamran Abbasi
BMJ 2003 327: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Should we be screening for and treating amblyopia?

Gordon N Dutton and Marie Cleary
BMJ 2003 327: 1242-1243. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Alexander, P, Rahi, J S, Hingorani, M (2009). Provision and cost of children's and young people's eye services in the UK: findings from a single primary care trust. Br J Ophthalmol 93: 645-649 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Majeed, M, Williams, C, Northstone, K, Ben-Shlomo, Y (2008). Are there inequities in the utilisation of childhood eye-care services in relation to socio-economic status? Evidence from the ALSPAC cohort. Br J Ophthalmol 92: 965-969 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Stewart, C. E., Stephens, D. A., Fielder, A. R., Moseley, M. J., on behalf of the MOTAS Cooperative, (2007). Modeling Dose-Response in Amblyopia: Toward a Child-Specific Treatment Plan. IOVS 48: 2589-2594 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Morad, Y., Bakshi, E., Levin, A., Binyamini, O. G., Zadok, D., Avni, I., Dayan, Y. B. (2007). Screening and Treating Amblyopia: Are We Making a Difference?. IOVS 48: 2084-2088 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Arnoldi, K. A. (2007). Current Recommendations for Amblyopia Treatment. Amer. Orthoptic Jrnl. 57: 60-67 [Abstract]  
• Loudon, S. E., Fronius, M., Looman, C. W. N., Awan, M., Simonsz, B., van der Maas, P. J., Simonsz, H. J. (2006). Predictors and a remedy for noncompliance with amblyopia therapy in children measured with the occlusion dose monitor.. IOVS 47: 4393-4400 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Hrisos, S, Clarke, M P, Kelly, T, Henderson, J, Wright, C M (2006). Unilateral visual impairment and neurodevelopmental performance in preschool children. Br J Ophthalmol 90: 836-838 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Wang, C. J., McGlynn, E. A., Brook, R. H., Leonard, C. H., Piecuch, R. E., Hsueh, S. I., Schuster, M. A. (2006). Quality-of-Care Indicators for the Neurodevelopmental Follow-up of Very Low Birth Weight Children: Results of an Expert Panel Process.. Pediatrics 117: 2080-2092 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Dixon-Woods, M, Awan, M, Gottlob, I (2006). Why is compliance with occlusion therapy for amblyopia so hard? A qualitative study. Arch. Dis. Child. 91: 491-494 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Rahi, J S, Cumberland, P M, Peckham, C S (2006). Does amblyopia affect educational, health, and social outcomes? Findings from 1958 British birth cohort. BMJ 332: 820-825 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• O'Connor, A R, Stewart, C E, Singh, J, Fielder, A R (2006). Do infants of birth weight less than 1500 g require additional long term ophthalmic follow up?. Br J Ophthalmol 90: 451-455 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Webb, B S, McGraw, P V, Levi, D M (2006). Learning with a lazy eye: a potential treatment for amblyopia.. Br J Ophthalmol 90: 518-518 [Full text]  
• Shea, S J, Gaccon, L (2006). In the absence of strabismus what constitutes a visual deficit in children?. Br J Ophthalmol 90: 40-43 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Awan, M., Proudlock, F. A, Gottlob, I. (2005). A Randomized Controlled Trial of Unilateral Strabismic and Mixed Amblyopia Using Occlusion Dose Monitors to Record Compliance. IOVS 46: 1435-1439 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group, (2005). Randomized Trial of Treatment of Amblyopia in Children Aged 7 to 17 Years. Arch Ophthalmol 123: 437-447 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Guggenheim, J A, Farbrother, J E (2005). A deficit in visits to the optometrist by preschool age children: implications for vision screening. Br J Ophthalmol 89: 246-247 [Full text]  
• Richardson, S. R., Wright, C. M., Hrisos, S., Buck, D., Clarke, M. P. (2005). Stereoacuity in Unilateral Visual Impairment Detected at Preschool Screening: Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial. IOVS 46: 150-154 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Stewart, C E, Moseley, M J, Fielder, A R, Stephens, D A, and the MOTAS cooperative, (2004). Refractive adaptation in amblyopia: quantification of effect and implications for practice. Br J Ophthalmol 88: 1552-1556 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Stewart, C. E., Moseley, M. J., Stephens, D. A., Fielder, A. R. (2004). Treatment Dose-Response in Amblyopia Therapy: The Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (MOTAS). IOVS 45: 3048-3054 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• (2004). Treatment for amblyopia can wait until school entry. Br J Ophthalmol 88: 891-891 [Full text]  
• U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, (2004). Screening for Visual Impairment in Children Younger Than Age 5 Years: Recommendation Statement. Ann Fam Med 2: 263-266 [Full text]  
• (2004). Other articles noted: 14 Nov 2003 to 30 Jan 2004. Evid. Based Nurs. 7: e2-e2 [Full text]  
• Dutton, G. N, Cleary, M. (2003). Should we be screening for and treating amblyopia?. BMJ 327: 1242-1243 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Blind Faith

Des Spence
bmj.com, 29 Nov 2003 [Full text]

Support for 4-5 year screening

Catherine E Stewart
bmj.com, 2 Dec 2003 [Full text]

Amblyopia- screen early.

Gerard O' Brien
bmj.com, 3 Dec 2003 [Full text]

Questions unanswered

Hirekatur V Srinivas
bmj.com, 5 Dec 2003 [Full text]

Treatment of unilateral visual impairment may have a brighter future

Ian F Comaish
bmj.com, 9 Dec 2003 [Full text]

To treat or not to treat?

Sapana H bhansali
bmj.com, 9 Dec 2003 [Full text]

Ample evidence of absence?

Kittisak Kulvichit, et al.
bmj.com, 18 Dec 2003 [Full text]

Mild amblyopia should still be treated

Richard Harrad, et al.
bmj.com, 9 Jan 2004 [Full text]

Authors' response

Michael P Clarke
bmj.com, 26 Jan 2004 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more here>> and here>>