BMJ  2003;327:1136-1138 (15 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7424.1136

Paper

Retrospective analysis of evidence base for tests used in diagnosis and monitoring of disease in respiratory medicine

¹ Department of Cardiorespiratory Medicine, Hope Hospital, Manchester M6 8HD, ² Department of Clinical Medicine and Immunological Sciences, Division of Respiratory Diseases, University of Siena, Viale Bracci 3, 53100 Siena, Italy

Objectives To determine how many common clinical tests used in a respiratory medicine outpatient clinic are based on high quality evidence.

Design Retrospective review of case notes. Record of first three tests for each patient. Diagnostic tests, tests used to assess existing condition, explicit trials of therapy were included. Literature search for supporting evidence and grading of best evidence for each test.

Setting Inner city university teaching hospital in the United Kingdom.

Participants All new outpatients referred to a single respiratory medicine team over a period of three months.

Main outcome measures Proportion of tests supported by level 1a-1c evidence (scale developed by Centre for Evidence Based Medicine).

Results Only half the tests that were used to make or exclude a diagnosis and a fifth of the tests used to assess a known condition were supported by level 1a-1c evidence. There was no evidence to support trials of therapy.

Conclusions A large proportion of clinical tests in respiratory medicine are not supported by level 1a-1c evidence. None of the therapeutic trials that were used were supported by evidence.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Many investigative tests are not evidence based
BMJ 2003 327: 0. [Full Text]

Dawn of the diagnostic age

Kamran Abbasi
BMJ 2003 327: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Keeley, P. W., Waterhouse, E. T., Noble, S. I.R. (2007). The evidence base of palliative medicine: is inpatient palliative medicine evidence-based?. Palliat Med 21: 623-627 [Abstract]  
• Beydon, N., Davis, S. D., Lombardi, E., Allen, J. L., Arets, H. G. M., Aurora, P., Bisgaard, H., Davis, G. M., Ducharme, F. M., Eigen, H., Gappa, M., Gaultier, C., Gustafsson, P. M., Hall, G. L., Hantos, Z., Healy, M. J. R., Jones, M. H., Klug, B., Lodrup Carlsen, K. C., McKenzie, S. A., Marchal, F., Mayer, O. H., Merkus, P. J. F. M., Morris, M. G., Oostveen, E., Pillow, J. J., Seddon, P. C., Silverman, M., Sly, P. D., Stocks, J., Tepper, R. S., Vilozni, D., Wilson, N. M., on behalf of the American Thoracic Society/Europea, (2007). An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Pulmonary Function Testing in Preschool Children. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 175: 1304-1345 [Full text]  
• Vestbo, J. (2006). Clinical Assessment, Staging, and Epidemiology of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations. Proc Am Thorac Soc 3: 252-256 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Montella, S., Andreucci, M. V., Greco, L., Barbarano, F., De Stefano, S., Brunese, L., Santamaria, F. (2005). Clinical utility of CT in children with persistent focal chest abnormality. Eur Respir J 26: 751-752 [Full text]  
• Dundas, I, Chan, E Y, Bridge, P D, McKenzie, S A (2005). Diagnostic accuracy of bronchodilator responsiveness in wheezy children. Thorax 60: 13-16 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• (2004). Many Diagnostic Tests Aren't Supported By Evidence. JWatch Gastroenterology 2004: 6-6 [Full text]  
• (2004). Many Diagnostic Tests Aren't Supported By Evidence. JWatch General 2004: 4-4 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Easy Isn't

Ned Hoke
bmj.com, 17 Nov 2003 [Full text]

RCTs are not everything

Kath H Checkland
bmj.com, 17 Nov 2003 [Full text]

A plea for research enhanced medicine

Rod A Lawson
bmj.com, 18 Nov 2003 [Full text]

Dont confuse validity with levels of evidence

Ben d Ewald, et al.
bmj.com, 1 Dec 2003 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>