BMJ  2003;327:22-26 (5 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7405.22

Paper

Prospective observational cohort study of time saved by prehospital thrombolysis for ST elevation myocardial infarction delivered by paramedics

¹ Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, ² Scottish Ambulance Service, Dundee DD3 8PQ

Objectives To evaluate a system of prehospital thrombolysis, delivered by paramedics, in meeting the national service framework's targets for the management of acute myocardial infarction.

Design Prospective observational cohort study comparing patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction considered for thrombolysis in the prehospital environment with patients treated in hospital.

Setting The catchment area of a large teaching hospital, including urban and rural areas.

Participants 201 patients presenting concurrently over a 12 month period who had changes to the electrocardiogram that were diagnostic of acute myocardial infarction or who received thrombolysis for suspected acute myocardial infarction.

Main outcome measures Time from first medical contact to initiation of thrombolysis (call to needle time), number of patients given thrombolysis appropriately, and all cause mortality in hospital.

Results The median call to needle time for patients treated before arriving in hospital (n=28) was 52 (95% confidence interval 41 to 62) minutes. Patients from similar rural areas who were treated in hospital (n=43) had a median time of 125 (104 to 140) minutes. This represents a median time saved of 73 minutes (P < 0.001). Sixty minutes after medical contact 64% of patients (18/28) treated before arrival in hospital had received thrombolysis; this compares with 4% of patients (2/43) in a cohort from similar areas. Median call to needle time for patients from urban areas (n=107) was 80 (78 to 93) minutes. Myocardial infarction was confirmed in 89% of patients (25/28) who had received prehospital thrombolysis; this compares with 92% (138/150) in the two groups of patients receiving thrombolysis in hospital.

Conclusions Thrombolysis delivered by paramedics with support from the base hospital can meet the national targets for early thrombolysis. The system has been shown to work well and can be introduced without delay.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Costs and effectiveness of prehospital thrombolysis need to be clear

M Kroese and D Kanka
BMJ 2003 327: 1051. [Extract] [Full Text]

Prehospital thrombolysis

Bernard D Prendergast
BMJ 2003 327: 1-2. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

From publication to change

Richard Smith
BMJ 2003 327: 0. [Extract] [Full Text]

Prehospital thrombolysis by paramedics saves time
BMJ 2003 327: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Ting, H. H., Krumholz, H. M., Bradley, E. H., Cone, D. C., Curtis, J. P., Drew, B. J., Field, J. M., French, W. J., Gibler, W. B., Goff, D. C., Jacobs, A. K., Nallamothu, B. K., O'Connor, R. E., Schuur, J. D. (2008). Implementation and Integration of Prehospital ECGs Into Systems of Care for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research, Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, and Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 118: 1066-1079 [Full text]  
• Wei, L, Lang, C C, Sullivan, F M, Boyle, P, Wang, J, Pringle, S D, MacDonald, T M (2008). Impact on mortality following first acute myocardial infarction of distance between home and hospital: cohort study. Heart 94: 1141-1146 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Alter, D. A., Ko, D. T., Newman, A., Tu, J. V. (2006). Factors explaining the under-use of reperfusion therapy among ideal patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 27: 1539-1549 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• (2005). Part 5: Acute Coronary Syndromes. Circulation 112: III-55-III-72 [Full text]  
• Chittari, M S V M, Ahmad, I, Chambers, B, Knight, F, Scriven, A, Pitcher, D (2005). Retrospective observational case-control study comparing prehospital thrombolytic therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction with in-hospital thrombolytic therapy for patients from same area. Emerg. Med. J. 22: 582-585 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Woollard, M, Pitt, K, Hayward, A J, Taylor, N C (2005). Limited benefits of ambulance telemetry in delivering early thrombolysis: a randomised controlled trial. Emerg. Med. J. 22: 209-215 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Corfield, A R, Graham, C A, Adams, J N, Booth, I, McGuffie, A C (2004). Emergency department thrombolysis improves door to needle times. Emerg. Med. J. 21: 676-680 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Rawles, J, Marsden, A (2004). Impact of "dual response" on prehospital thrombolysis in remote and rural areas of Scotland: prospective observational study. Emerg. Med. J. 21: 720-721 [Full text]  
• Price, G C, Kulkarni, A P, Saxena, M, O'Leary, M (2004). Hard to swallow: an unusual complication of thrombolysis. Emerg. Med. J. 21: 747-749 [Full text]  
• Smith, J.A.L., Jennings, K.P., Anderson, E.A., Green, P., Hillis, G.S. (2004). Reducing call-to-needle times: the critical role of pre-hospital thrombolysis. QJM 97: 655-661 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Writing Committee Members, , Antman, E. M., Anbe, D. T., Armstrong, P. W., Bates, E. R., Green, L. A., Hand, M., Hochman, J. S., Krumholz, H. M., Kushner, F. G., Lamas, G. A., Mullany, C. J., Ornato, J. P., Pearle, D. L., Sloan, M. A., Smith, S. C. Jr, Task Force Members, , Antman, E. M., Smith, S. C. Jr, Alpert, J. S., Anderson, J. L., Faxon, D. P., Fuster, V., Gibbons, R. J., Gregoratos, G., Halperin, J. L., Hiratzka, L. F., Hunt, S. A., Jacobs, A. K., Ornato, J. P. (2004). ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-Elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction) . J Am Coll Cardiol 44: 671-719 [Full text]  
• Antman, E. M., Anbe, D. T., Armstrong, P. W., Bates, E. R., Green, L. A., Hand, M., Hochman, J. S., Krumholz, H. M., Kushner, F. G., Lamas, G. A., Mullany, C. J., Ornato, J. P., Pearle, D. L., Sloan, M. A., Smith, S. C. Jr, Antman, E. M., Smith, S. C. Jr, Alpert, J. S., Anderson, J. L., Faxon, D. P., Fuster, V., Gibbons, R. J., Gregoratos, G., Halperin, J. L., Hiratzka, L. F., Hunt, S. A., Jacobs, A. K., Ornato, J. P. (2004). ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction--Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction). Circulation 110: 588-636 [Full text]  
• Kroese, M., Kanka, D., Weissberg, P., Arch, B., Scott, J. (2004). Prehospital thrombolysis--calculated health benefit for catchment population of one hospital. JRSM 97: 230-234 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Wardrope, J., Laird, C., Driscoll, P. (2004). The ABC of community emergency care: 1 Introduction, series summary, the system of care. Emerg. Med. J. 21: 89-94 [Full text]  
• Kroese, M, Kanka, D (2003). Costs and effectiveness of prehospital thrombolysis need to be clear. BMJ 327: 1051-1051 [Full text]  
• (2003). Timely Prehospital Thrombolysis by Paramedics. Journal Watch Cardiology 2003: 2-2 [Full text]  
• (2003). Prehospital Thrombolysis for MI Saves Time, but Does It Save Lives?. JWatch Emergency Med. 2003: 4-4 [Full text]  
• Prendergast, B. D (2003). Prehospital thrombolysis. BMJ 327: 1-2 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Prehospital Thrombolysis

Mark Kroese, et al.
bmj.com, 22 Jul 2003 [Full text]