BMJ  2003;326:1436 (28 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1436

Primary care

Comparison of methods to identify individuals at increased risk of coronary disease from the general population

S Wilson, senior research fellow1, A Johnston, professor1, J Robson, senior lecturer2, N Poulter, professor3, D Collier, senior research fellow1, G Feder, professor2, M J Caulfield, professor1

1 Clinical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London, Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, London EC1M 6BQ, 2 General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Community Health Sciences, Barts and The London, Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, London E1 4NS, 3 Cardiovascular Studies Unit, Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London W2 1PG

Correspondence to: S Wilson s.l.wilson{at}qmul.ac.uk

Objectives To evaluate the guidelines on measurement of cholesterol in the national service framework for coronary heart disease and to compare alternative strategies for identifying people at high risk of coronary disease in the general population.

Design Comparison of methods (national service framework criteria, Sheffield tables, age threshold of 50 years, estimated risk assessment using fixed cholesterol values) for identifying people with a 10 year coronary event risk of 15% or greater.

Setting Health survey for England 1998.

Subjects 6307 people aged between 30 and 74 years with no history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or angina.

Main outcome measures Proportion of the total population selected for measurement of cholesterol and proportion of people at 15% or greater risk identified.

Results The national service framework guidelines selected 43.4% (95% confidence interval 42.2% to 44.6%) of the study population for cholesterol measurement and identified 81.2% (80.2% to 82.2%) of those at 15% or greater risk. The Sheffield tables selected 73.1% (72.0% to 74.2%) for cholesterol measurement and identified 99.91% (99.83% to 99.99%) of those at 15% or greater risk. An age threshold of 50 years selected 46.3% (45.1% to 47.5%) for cholesterol measurement and identified 92.8% (92.1% to 93.4%) of those at 15% or greater risk. Estimated risk assessments using fixed cholesterol values selected 17.8% (16.8% to 18.7%) for cholesterol measurement and identified 75.9% (74.8% to 76.9%) of those at 15% or greater risk.

Conclusion Measuring the cholesterol concentration of everyone aged 50 years and over is a simple and efficient method of identifying people at high risk of coronary disease in the general population.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Methods to identify increased risk of coronary disease in the general population: Conclusion is oversimplification
Gerd Assmann, Paul Cullen, and Helmut Schulte
BMJ 2003 327: 619. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

The most important BMJ for 50 years?
Richard Smith
BMJ 2003 326: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Measure cholesterol in everyone over 50
BMJ 2003 326: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Macleod, J., Carroll, D. (2003). Commentary: What should we make of associations between vital exhaustion and heart disease?. Int J Epidemiol 32: 997-999 [Full text]  
  • Assmann, G., Cullen, P., Schulte, H. (2003). Methods to identify increased risk of coronary disease in the general population: Conclusion is oversimplification. BMJ 327: 619-619 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Comparison of methods to identify high risk individuals
Ronan M Conroy, et al.
bmj.com, 27 Jun 2003 [Full text]
Optimum strategies for patient selection in prevention of CHD
Tom P Marshall
bmj.com, 30 Jun 2003 [Full text]
Absolute Risk assessment: which table to use?
Davide Giavarina, et al.
bmj.com, 5 Jul 2003 [Full text]
Integrated updated risk profiling
John M Waddell, et al.
bmj.com, 7 Jul 2003 [Full text]
Conclusion is an Oversimplification
Gerd Assmann, et al.
bmj.com, 7 Jul 2003 [Full text]
CAD risk assessment must start before the age of 50 years
Benoit J BOLAND, et al.
bmj.com, 18 Jul 2003 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Risk of surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: record linkage studies

What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview