BMJ  2003;326:1167-1170 (31 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7400.1167

Paper

Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review

¹ School of Health Policy and Management, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada M3J 1P3, ² Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA, ³ Interdisciplinary Oncology Program, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA, ⁴ Instituto do Radium de Campinas, 13075-460 Campinas-SP, Brazil

Objective To investigate whether funding of drug studies by the pharmaceutical industry is associated with outcomes that are favourable to the funder and whether the methods of trials funded by pharmaceutical companies differ from the methods in trials with other sources of support.

Methods Medline (January 1966 to December 2002) and Embase (January 1980 to December 2002) searches were supplemented with material identified in the references and in the authors' personal files. Data were independently abstracted by three of the authors and disagreements were resolved by consensus.

Results 30 studies were included. Research funded by drug companies was less likely to be published than research funded by other sources. Studies sponsored by pharmaceutical companies were more likely to have outcomes favouring the sponsor than were studies with other sponsors (odds ratio 4.05; 95% confidence interval 2.98 to 5.51; 18 comparisons). None of the 13 studies that analysed methods reported that studies funded by industry was of poorer quality.

Conclusion Systematic bias favours products which are made by the company funding the research. Explanations include the selection of an inappropriate comparator to the product being investigated and publication bias.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration

Alessandro Liberati, Douglas G Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Cynthia Mulrow, Peter C Gøtzsche, John P A Ioannidis, Mike Clarke, P J Devereaux, Jos Kleijnen, and David Moher
BMJ 2009 339: b2700. [Abstract] [Full Text]

Relation of study quality, concordance, take home message, funding, and impact in studies of influenza vaccines: systematic review

T Jefferson, C Di Pietrantonj, M G Debalini, A Rivetti, and V Demicheli
BMJ 2009 338: b354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Build bridges with the drugs industry—but keep patients in mind

Ian Gilmore
BMJ 2009 338: b439. [Extract] [Full Text]

Who’s watching the watchdogs?

Lisa M Schwartz, Steven Woloshin, and Ray Moynihan
BMJ 2008 337: a2535. [Extract] [Full Text]

Improving access to research data in Europe

Philipa Mladovsky, Elias Mossialos, and Martin McKee
BMJ 2008 336: 287-288. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Financial ties and concordance between results and conclusions in meta-analyses: retrospective cohort study

Veronica Yank, Drummond Rennie, and Lisa A Bero
BMJ 2007 335: 1202-1205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Long term pharmacotherapy for obesity and overweight: updated meta-analysis

Diana Rucker, Raj Padwal, Stephanie K Li, Cintia Curioni, and David C W Lau
BMJ 2007 335: 1194-1199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Should patient groups accept money from drug companies? No

Barbara Mintzes
BMJ 2007 334: 935. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review

Anders W Jørgensen, Jørgen Hilden, and Peter C Gøtzsche
BMJ 2006 333: 782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Origin and funding of the most frequently cited papers in medicine: database analysis

Nikolaos A Patsopoulos, John P A Ioannidis, and Apostolos A Analatos
BMJ 2006 332: 1061-1064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Bias in published cost effectiveness studies: systematic review

Chaim M Bell, David R Urbach, Joel G Ray, Ahmed Bayoumi, Allison B Rosen, Dan Greenberg, and Peter J Neumann
BMJ 2006 332: 699-703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Behavioural medicine: changing our behaviour

Theresa Marteau, Paul Dieppe, Robbie Foy, Ann-Louise Kinmonth, and Neil Schneiderman
BMJ 2006 332: 437-438. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study

Giuseppe G L Biondi-Zoccai, Marzia Lotrionte, Antonio Abbate, Luca Testa, Enrico Remigi, Francesco Burzotta, Marco Valgimigli, Enrico Romagnoli, Filippo Crea, and Pierfrancesco Agostoni
BMJ 2006 332: 202-209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

In praise of uncertainty

Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2005 331: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Are experimental treatments for cancer in children superior to established treatments? Observational study of randomised controlled trials by the Children's Oncology Group

Ambuj Kumar, Heloisa Soares, Robert Wells, Mike Clarke, Iztok Hozo, Archie Bleyer, Gregory Reaman, Iain Chalmers, and Benjamin Djulbegovic
BMJ 2005 331: 1295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Randomised controlled trials in Africa of HIV and AIDS: descriptive study and spatial distribution

Nandi Siegfried, Mike Clarke, and Jimmy Volmink
BMJ 2005 331: 742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Doctors and the drug industry

Marcus Müllner
BMJ 2003 326: 1220. [Extract] [Full Text]

Food, flattery, and friendship

Jane Smith
BMJ 2003 326: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Research sponsored by drug companies is biased
BMJ 2003 326: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Vedula, S. S., Bero, L., Scherer, R. W., Dickersin, K. (2009). Outcome Reporting in Industry-Sponsored Trials of Gabapentin for Off-Label Use. NEJM 361: 1963-1971 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Okike, K., Kocher, M. S., Wei, E. X., Mehlman, C. T., Bhandari, M. (2009). Accuracy of Conflict-of-Interest Disclosures Reported by Physicians. NEJM 361: 1466-1474 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Khazeni, N., Bravata, D. M., Holty, J.-E. C., Uyeki, T. M., Stave, C. D., Gould, M. K. (2009). Systematic Review: Safety and Efficacy of Extended-Duration Antiviral Chemoprophylaxis Against Pandemic and Seasonal Influenza. ANN INTERN MED 151: 464-473 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Schunemann, H. J., Osborne, M., Moss, J., Manthous, C., Wagner, G., Sicilian, L., Ohar, J., McDermott, S., Lucas, L., Jaeschke, R., on behalf of the ATS Ethics and Conflict of Intere, (2009). An Official American Thoracic Society Policy Statement: Managing Conflict of Interest in Professional Societies. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 180: 564-580 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Brody, H. (2009). Pharmaceutical industry financial support for medical education: benefit, or undue influence?. J Law Med Ethics 37: 451-460  
• Hirsch, L. J. (2009). Conflicts of Interest, Authorship, and Disclosures in Industry-Related Scientific Publications: The Tort Bar and Editorial Oversight of Medical Journals. Mayo Clin Proc. 84: 811-821 [Full text]  
• Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P.A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. ANN INTERN MED 151: W-65-W-94 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Greenland, S. (2009). Accounting for uncertainty about investigator bias: disclosure is informative: How could disclosure of interests work better in medicine, epidemiology and public health?. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 63: 593-598 [Full text]  
• Michaels, D. (2009). Addressing conflict in strategic literature reviews: disclosure is not enough: How could disclosure of interests work better in medicine, epidemiology and public health?. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 63: 599-600 [Full text]  
• Marcovitch, H. (2009). How do potential conflicts of interest confuse medicine and public health?: How could disclosure of interests work better in medicine, epidemiology and public health?. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 63: 608-609 [Full text]  
• Smith, A., Warner, J. (2009). Psychiatrists' appreciation of statistical v. clinical significance: a quick test. Psychiatr. Bull. 33: 293-295 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Liberati, A., Altman, D. G, Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C, Ioannidis, J. P A, Clarke, M., Devereaux, P J, Kleijnen, J., Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339: b2700-b2700 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Irwin, R. S. (2009). The Role of Conflict of Interest in Reporting of Scientific Information. Chest 136: 253-259 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Jutel, A., Menkes, D. B (2009). "But Doctors do it...": Nurses' Views of Gifts and Information from the Pharmaceutical Industry. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 43: 1057-1063 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Kummerfeldt, C E, Barnoya, J, Bero, L (2009). Philip Morris involvement in the development of an air quality laboratory in El Salvador. Tobacco Control 18: 241-244 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Jefferson, T, Di Pietrantonj, C, Debalini, M G, Rivetti, A, Demicheli, V (2009). Relation of study quality, concordance, take home message, funding, and impact in studies of influenza vaccines: systematic review. BMJ 338: b354-b354 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Gilmore, I. (2009). Build bridges with the drugs industry--but keep patients in mind. BMJ 338: b439-b439 [Full text]  
• House, E. R. (2008). Blowback: Consequences of Evaluation for Evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation 29: 416-426 [Abstract]  
• Schwartz, L. M, Woloshin, S., Moynihan, R. (2008). Who's watching the watchdogs?. BMJ 337: a2535-a2535 [Full text]  
• Liesegang, T. J. (2008). Commercialism, Loss of Professionalism, and the Effect on Journals. Arch Ophthalmol 126: 1292-1295 [Full text]  
• Schmelzle, J., Birtwhistle, R. V., Tan, A. K.W. (2008). Acute otitis media in children with tympanostomy tubes. cfp 54: 1123-1127 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Doucet, M, Sismondo, S (2008). Evaluating solutions to sponsorship bias. J. Med. Ethics 34: 627-630 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Bastawrous, A, Smith, M C F (2008). We are part of the problem. Br J Ophthalmol 92: 1010-1010 [Full text]  
• Salanti, G., Higgins, J. P., Ades, A., Ioannidis, J. P. (2008). Evaluation of networks of randomized trials. Stat Methods Med Res 17: 279-301 [Abstract]  
• Whitlock, E. P., Lin, J. S., Chou, R., Shekelle, P., Robinson, K. A. (2008). Using Existing Systematic Reviews in Complex Systematic Reviews. ANN INTERN MED 148: 776-782 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Deshauer, D. MD MSc, Moher, D. PhD, Fergusson, D. PhD, Moher, E. BA, Sampson, M. MLIS, Grimshaw, J. MD PhD (2008). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for unipolar depression: a systematic review of classic long-term randomized controlled trials. CMAJ 178: 1293-1301 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Djulbegovic, B., Kumar, A., Soares, H. P., Hozo, I., Bepler, G., Clarke, M., Bennett, C. L. (2008). Treatment Success in Cancer: New Cancer Treatment Successes Identified in Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trials Conducted by the National Cancer Institute-Sponsored Cooperative Oncology Groups, 1955 to 2006. Arch Intern Med 168: 632-642 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Noble, J. H. Jr, Sharav, V. H. (2008). Protecting People With Decisional Impairments and Legal Incapacity Against Biomedical Research Abuse. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 18: 230-244 [Abstract]  
• Rosenheck, R.A., Leslie, D.L., Busch, S., Rofman, E. S., Sernyak, M. (2008). Rethinking Antipsychotic Formulary Policy. Schizophr Bull 34: 375-380 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Mladovsky, P., Mossialos, E., McKee, M. (2008). Improving access to research data in Europe. BMJ 336: 287-288 [Full text]  
• Dartnell, J., Hemming, M., Collier, J., Ollenschlaeger, G. (2008). Putting evidence into context: some advice for guideline writers. Evid. Based Nurs. 11: 6-8 [Full text]  
• Rucker, D., Padwal, R., Li, S. K, Curioni, C., Lau, D. C W (2007). Long term pharmacotherapy for obesity and overweight: updated meta-analysis. BMJ 335: 1194-1199 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Yank, V., Rennie, D., Bero, L. A (2007). Financial ties and concordance between results and conclusions in meta-analyses: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 335: 1202-1205 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Claxton, L. (2007). A review of conflict of interest, competing interest, and bias for toxicologists. Toxicol Ind Health 23: 557-571 [Abstract]  
• Lubowitz, J. H., Appleby, D., Centeno, J. M., Woolf, S. K., Reid, J. B. III (2007). The Relationship Between the Outcome of Studies of Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation and the Presence of Commercial Funding. Am J Sports Med 35: 1809-1816 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Nieto, A., Mazon, A., Pamies, R., Linana, J. J., Lanuza, A., Jimenez, F. O., Medina-Hernandez, A., Nieto, F. J. (2007). Adverse Effects of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Funded and Nonfunded Studies. Arch Intern Med 167: 2047-2053 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Vandenbroucke, J. P., Elm, E. v., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Mulrow, C. D., Pocock, S. J., Poole, C., Schlesselman, J. J., Egger, M., for the STROBE initiative, (2007). Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration. ANN INTERN MED 147: W-163-W-194 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Riechelmann, R. P., Wang, L., O'Carroll, A., Krzyzanowska, M. K. (2007). Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest by Authors of Clinical Trials and Editorials in Oncology. JCO 25: 4642-4647 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Dartnell, J., Hemming, M., Collier, J., Ollenschlaeger, G. (2007). Putting evidence into context: some advice for guideline writers. Evid. Based Med. 12: 130-132 [Full text]  
• Reed, D. A., Cook, D. A., Beckman, T. J., Levine, R. B., Kern, D. E., Wright, S. M. (2007). Association Between Funding and Quality of Published Medical Education Research. JAMA 298: 1002-1009 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Coleman, M. (2007). Not credible: a subversion of science by the pharmaceutical industry. Commentary on A global comparison regarding patient access to cancer drugs (Ann Oncol 2007; 18 Suppl 3: pp 1 75). Ann Oncol 18: 1433-1435 [Full text]  
• Gogol, M. (2007). Standards in dementia care. Age Ageing 36: 599-600 [Full text]  
• Rosenheck, R. A. (2007). Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of reduced tardive dyskinesia with second-generation antipsychotics. Br. J. Psychiatry 191: 238-245 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Djulbegovic, B., Angelotta, C., Knox, K. E., Bennett, C. L. (2007). The Sound and the Fury: Financial Conflicts of Interest in Oncology. JCO 25: 3567-3569 [Full text]  
• Gray, S. W., Hlubocky, F. J., Ratain, M. J., Daugherty, C. K. (2007). Attitudes Toward Research Participation and Investigator Conflicts of Interest Among Advanced Cancer Patients Participating in Early Phase Clinical Trials. JCO 25: 3488-3494 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Tungaraza, T., Poole, R. (2007). Influence of drug company authorship and sponsorship on drug trial outcomes. Br. J. Psychiatry 191: 82-83 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Mintzes, B. (2007). Should patient groups accept money from drug companies? No. BMJ 334: 935-935 [Full text]  
• Lynch, J. R., Cunningham, M. R.A., Warme, W. J., Schaad, D. C., Wolf, F. M., Leopold, S. S. (2007). Commercially Funded and United States-Based Research Is More Likely to Be Published; Good-Quality Studies with Negative Outcomes Are Not. JBJS 89: 1010-1018 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• ROSENHECK, R., STROUP, T. S., SWARTZ, M., McEVOY, J., DAVIS, S. M., KEEFE, R. S.E., HSIAO, J. K., LIEBERMAN, J. (2007). Dr. Rosenheck and Colleagues Reply. Am. J. Psychiatry 164: 678-680 [Full text]  
• Irwin, R. S. (2007). Clinical Trial Registration Promotes Patient Protection and Benefit, Advances the Trust of Everyone, and Is Required. Chest 131: 639-641 [Full text]  
• Biondi-Zoccai, G. G.L., Abbate, A., Valgimigli, M., Agostoni, P. (2007). Keeping a high standard in quantitative analyses, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews. Eur Heart J 0: ehl502v1-1 [Full text]  
• Ligthart, S., Vlemmix, F., Dendukuri, N., Brophy, J. M. (2007). The cost-effectiveness of drug-eluting stents: a systematic review. CMAJ 176: 199-205 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Martell, B. A., O'Connor, P. G., Kerns, R. D., Becker, W. C., Morales, K. H., Kosten, T. R., Fiellin, D. A. (2007). Systematic Review: Opioid Treatment for Chronic Back Pain: Prevalence, Efficacy, and Association with Addiction. ANN INTERN MED 146: 116-127 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Bastian, H. (2006). 'They would say that, wouldn't they?' A reader's guide to author and sponsor biases in clinical research. JRSM 99: 611-614 [Full text]  
• Bero, L A (2006). Clinical trial registration at Tobacco Control. Tobacco Control 15: 417-418 [Full text]  
• Jorgensen, A. W, Hilden, J., Gotzsche, P. C (2006). Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review. BMJ 333: 782- [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Chalmers, I. (2006). From optimism to disillusion about commitment to transparency in the medico-industrial complex. JRSM 99: 337-341 [Full text]  
• Psaty, B. M., Rennie, D. (2006). Clinical Trial Investigators and Their Prescribing Patterns: Another Dimension to the Relationship Between Physician Investigators and the Pharmaceutical Industry. JAMA 295: 2787-2790 [Full text]  
• MONTGOMERY, J. H. (2006). Industry Funding and Author-Industry Affiliation in Clinical Trials in Psychiatry. Am. J. Psychiatry 163: 1110-1111 [Full text]  
• Brown, S. D., Daly, J. C., Kalish, L. A., McDaniel, S. A. (2006). Financial Disclosures of Scientific Papers Presented at the 2003 RSNA Annual Meeting: Association with Reporting of Non-Food and Drug Administration-approved Uses of Industry Products. Radiology 239: 849-855 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Patsopoulos, N. A, Ioannidis, J. P A, Analatos, A. A (2006). Origin and funding of the most frequently cited papers in medicine: database analysis. BMJ 332: 1061-1064 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Tarrier, N. (2006). Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: Comments From a Clinical Psychology Perspective. Schizophr Bull 32: 231-233 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Bell, C. M, Urbach, D. R, Ray, J. G, Bayoumi, A., Rosen, A. B, Greenberg, D., Neumann, P. J (2006). Bias in published cost effectiveness studies: systematic review. BMJ 332: 699-703 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Gluud, L. L. (2006). Bias in Clinical Intervention Research. Am J Epidemiol 163: 493-501 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Littlejohns, P., Chalkidou, K. (2006). Evidence for health policy. Journal of Research in Nursing 11: 110-117  
• Marteau, T., Dieppe, P., Foy, R., Kinmonth, A.-L., Schneiderman, N. (2006). Behavioural medicine: changing our behaviour.. BMJ 332: 437-438 [Full text]  
• Delgado-Rodriguez, M. (2006). Systematic reviews of meta-analyses: applications and limitations. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 60: 90-92 [Full text]  
• Heres, S., Davis, J., Maino, K., Jetzinger, E., Kissling, W., Leucht, S. (2006). Why Olanzapine Beats Risperidone, Risperidone Beats Quetiapine, and Quetiapine Beats Olanzapine: An Exploratory Analysis of Head-to-Head Comparison Studies of Second-Generation Antipsychotics. Am. J. Psychiatry 163: 185-194 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Biondi-Zoccai, G. G L, Lotrionte, M., Abbate, A., Testa, L., Remigi, E., Burzotta, F., Valgimigli, M., Romagnoli, E., Crea, F., Agostoni, P. (2006). Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study. BMJ 332: 202-209 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Bryan-Brown, C. W., Dracup, K. (2006). Disentangling The Web. Am J Crit Care 15: 7-9 [Full text]  
• Glasmacher, A., Prentice, A., Gorschluter, M., Engelhart, S., Hahn, C., Djulbegovic, B., Schmidt-Wolf, I. G.H. (2005). In Reply:. JCO 23: 9429-9432 [Full text]  
• Godlee, F. (2005). In praise of uncertainty. BMJ 331: 245- [Full text]  
• Kumar, A., Soares, H., Wells, R., Clarke, M., Hozo, I., Bleyer, A., Reaman, G., Chalmers, I., Djulbegovic, B. (2005). Are experimental treatments for cancer in children superior to established treatments? Observational study of randomised controlled trials by the Children's Oncology Group. BMJ 331: 1295- [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Dursun, S., Dinan, T. G., Bushe, C., Thakore, J. (2005). Challenges in advancing mental and physical health of patients with serious mental illness. J Psychopharmacol 19: 3-5  
• Holt, R. I. G., Bushe, C., Citrome, L. (2005). Diabetes and schizophrenia 2005: are we any closer to understanding the link?. J Psychopharmacol 19: 56-65 [Abstract]  
• Perlis, R. H., Perlis, C. S., Wu, Y., Hwang, C., Joseph, M., Nierenberg, A. A. (2005). Industry Sponsorship and Financial Conflict of Interest in the Reporting of Clinical Trials in Psychiatry. Am. J. Psychiatry 162: 1957-1960 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Siegfried, N., Clarke, M., Volmink, J. (2005). Randomised controlled trials in Africa of HIV and AIDS: descriptive study and spatial distribution. BMJ 331: 742- [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Genuis, S. J. (2005). The Proliferation of Clinical Practice Guidelines: Professional Development or Medicine-by-Numbers?. J Am Board Fam Med 18: 419-425 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Mirowski, P., Van Horn, R. (2005). The Contract Research Organization and the Commercialization of Scientific Research. Social Studies of Science 35: 503-548 [Abstract]  
• Kuruppuarachchi, K. A. L. A., Lawrence, T. S. (2005). Psychiatry and the pharmaceutical industry. Psychiatr. Bull. 29: 315-316 [Full text]  
• Chapman, S (2005). Research from tobacco industry affiliated authors: need for particular vigilance. Tobacco Control 14: 217-219 [Full text]  
• Hartling, L., McAlister, F. A., Rowe, B. H., Ezekowitz, J., Friesen, C., Klassen, T. P. (2005). Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Therapeutic Devices and Procedures. ANN INTERN MED 142: 1100-1111 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Brodkey, A. C. (2005). The Role of the Pharmaceutical Industry in Teaching Psychopharmacology: A Growing Problem. Acad. Psychiatry 29: 222-229 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Thomas, D (2005). Laboratory animals and the art of empathy. J. Med. Ethics 31: 197-202 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Grigg, J (2005). Good research conduct. Arch. Dis. Child. 90: 229-232 [Full text]  
• Ioannidis, J P A (2005). Large scale evidence and replication: insights from rheumatology and beyond. Ann Rheum Dis 64: 345-346 [Full text]  
• Cooper, R. J., Schriger, D. L. (2005). The availability of references and the sponsorship of original research cited in pharmaceutical advertisements. CMAJ 172: 487-491 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Holloway, R. G., French, J. A., Kanner, A., Gronseth, G., Krauss, G. L., French, J. A., Panayiotopoulos, C. P., Benbadis, S. R., Covanis, A., Dulac, O., Duncan, J. S., Eeg-Olofsson, O., Ferrie, C. D., Grunewald, R. A., Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenite, D. G.A., Koutroumanidis, M., Martinovic, Z., Newton, R. W., Parker, A. P. J., Salas-Puig, J., Sander, J. W., Shorvon, S., Watanabe, K., Whitehouse, W. P., Youroukos, S., French, J. A. (2005). Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs I: Treatment of new onset epilepsy: Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee and Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society. Neurology 64: 172-174 [Full text]  
• Miners, A H, Garau, M., Fidan, D., Fischer, A J (2005). Comparing estimates of cost effectiveness submitted to the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) by different organisations: retrospective study. BMJ 330: 65- [Abstract] [Full text]  
• van de Laar, F. A., Lucassen, P. L., Akkermans, R. P., van de Lisdonk, E. H., Rutten, G. E., van Weel, C. (2005). {alpha}-Glucosidase Inhibitors for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Results from a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 28: 154-163 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Lexchin, J. R (2005). Implications of Pharmaceutical Industry Funding on Clinical Research. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 39: 194-197 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Bias ?

David T Parry
bmj.com, 30 May 2003 [Full text]

whose is the bias?

Rowena H Cave
bmj.com, 30 May 2003 [Full text]

Not just pharmaceutical industry

Ian L. .
bmj.com, 1 Jun 2003 [Full text]

Uneasy interactions just around the corner

Konstantinos E. Paparounas
bmj.com, 3 Jun 2003 [Full text]

Biases in articles about biases

Jose A. Sacristan, et al.
bmj.com, 20 Jun 2003 [Full text]

Misleading Meta-Metaanalysis

Charlotte Ford, et al.
bmj.com, 3 Jul 2003 [Full text]

Industry-funded German Women Cohort Predictably Shows Cancer Prevention by Oral Contraceptives

Eberhard M. Greiser
bmj.com, 12 Jul 2003 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more on doc2doc >>