Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Ingeborg B C Korthals-de Bos a Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU
University Medical Centre, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT
Amsterdam, Netherlands, b Institute
for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Rotterdam,
Netherlands, c Department of General
Practice, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
Correspondence to: I B C Korthals-de Bos
ibc.korthals-de_bos.emgo{at}med.vu.nl
Objective:
To evaluate the cost effectiveness of
physiotherapy, manual therapy, and care by a general practitioner for
patients with neck pain.
What is already known on this topic
Many conservative interventions are available, such as prescription
drugs, yet their cost effectiveness has not been evaluated No randomised trials of conservative treatment for neck pain have so
far included an economic evaluation What this study adds
Patients undergoing manual therapy recovered more quickly than those
undergoing the other interventions
Design:
Economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial.
Setting:
Primary care.
Participants:
183 patients with neck pain for at
least two weeks recruited by 42 general practitioners and randomly
allocated to manual therapy (n=60, spinal mobilisation),
physiotherapy (n=59, mainly exercise), or general practitioner care
(n=64, counselling, education, and drugs).
Main outcome measures:
Clinical outcomes were
perceived recovery, intensity of pain, functional disability, and
quality of life. Direct and indirect costs were measured by means of
cost diaries that were kept by patients for one year. Differences in
mean costs between groups, cost effectiveness, and cost utility ratios
were evaluated by applying non-parametric bootstrapping techniques.
Results:
The manual therapy group showed a faster
improvement than the physiotherapy group and the general practitioner
care group up to 26 weeks, but differences were negligible by follow up
at 52 weeks. The total costs of manual therapy (
447; £273; $402)
were around one third of the costs of physiotherapy (
1297) and
general practitioner care (
1379). These differences were significant: P<0.01 for manual therapy versus physiotherapy and manual
therapy versus general practitioner care and P=0.55 for general
practitioner care versus physiotherapy. The cost effectiveness ratios
and the cost utility ratios showed that manual therapy was less costly
and more effective than physiotherapy or general practitioner care.
Conclusions:
Manual therapy (spinal mobilisation) is
more effective and less costly for treating neck pain than
physiotherapy or care by a general practitioner.
The cost of treating neck pain is considerable
Manual therapy is more effective and less costly than physiotherapy or
care by a general practitioner for treating neck pain
Read all Rapid Responses