Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
H David McCarthy a Department of Health and Human Sciences, London
Metropolitan University, London N7 8DB, b Centre for Paediatric
Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Child Health, London WC1N
1EH
Correspondence to: H D McCarthy d.mccarthy{at}londonmet.ac.uk
Objective:
To compare changes over time in waist
circumference (a measure of central fatness) and body mass index (a
measure of overall obesity) in British youth.
What is already known on this topic
Body mass index gives no indication of body fat distribution Waist circumference is a marker for central body fat accumulation; a
large waist circumference is linked to an increased risk of metabolic
complications What this study adds
The accumulation of central body fat has risen more steeply than whole
body fatness based on height and weight Current and future morbidity in British youth may be seriously affected
due to accumulation of excess central fat
Design:
Representative cross sectional surveys in 1977, 1987, and 1997.
Setting:
Great Britain.
Participants:
Young people aged 11-16 years surveyed
in 1977 (boys) and 1987 (girls) for the British Standards Institute (n=3784) and in 1997 (both sexes) for the national diet and nutrition survey (n=776).
Main outcome measures:
Waist circumference, expressed
as a standard deviation score using the first survey as reference, and
body mass index (weight(kg)/height(m)2), expressed as a
standard deviation score against the British 1990 revised reference.
Overweight and obesity were defined as the measurement exceeding the
91st and 98th centile, respectively.
Results:
Waist circumference increased sharply over the period between surveys (mean increases for boys and girls, 6.9 and
6.2 cm, or 0.84 and 1.02 SD score units, P<0.0001). In centile terms,
waist circumference increased more in girls than in boys. Increases in
body mass index were smaller and similar by sex (means 1.5 and 1.6, or
0.47 and 0.53 SD score units, P<0.0001). Waist circumference in 1997 exceeded the 91st centile in 28% (n=110) of boys and 38% (n=147)
of girls (against 9% for both sexes in 1977-87, P<0.0001), whereas
14% (n=54) and 17% (n=68), respectively, exceeded the 98th
centile (3% in 1977-87, P<0.0001). The corresponding rates for body
mass index in 1997 were 21% (n=80) of boys and 17% (n=67) of
girls exceeding the 91st centile (8% and 6% in 1977-87) and 10%
(n=39) and 8% (n=32) exceeding the 98th centile (3% and 2% in
1977-87).
Conclusions:
Trends in waist circumference during the
past 10-20 years have greatly exceeded those in body mass index,
particularly in girls, showing that body mass index is a poor proxy for
central fatness. Body mass index has therefore systematically
underestimated the prevalence of obesity in young people.
The prevalence of overweight and obesity in youth based on body mass
index has increased over the past 10-20 years
Waist circumference in British youth has increased over the past 10-20 years at a greater rate than body mass index, the increase being
greatest in females
Read all Rapid Responses