Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Kathleen D Ramos a University of California San Francisco, Fresno
Medical Education Program, Department of Family and Community Medicine,
445 South Cedar Avenue, Fresno, CA 93702, USA, b California State
University Fresno, Kremen School of Education and Human Development,
5005 North Maple Avenue, Fresno, CA 93740, USA
Correspondence to: K D Ramos
katie.ramos{at}ucsfresno.edu
Objective:
To describe the development and validation of a test of knowledge and skills in evidence based medicine.
What is already known on this topic
Existing measures to assess competence tend to be narrowly focused and
of uncertain validity What this study adds
The standardised grading systems produced a high degree of consistency
between graders Experts scored significantly higher on the test than novices in
evidence based medicine, showing that the test has construct
validity
Design:
Cross sectional study.
Setting:
Family practice residency programme in
California; a list server for those who teach evidence based medicine;
and an evidence based medicine seminar series.
Participants:
Family practice residents and faculty
members (n=43); volunteers self identified as experts in evidence
based medicine (n=53); family practice teachers (19) beginning a
seminar series on evidence based medicine.
Intervention:
The Fresno test is a performance based
measure for use in medical education that assesses a wide range of
evidence based medicine skills. Open ended questions are scored with
standardised grading rubrics. Calculation skills are assessed by fill
in the blank questions.
Main outcome measures:
Inter-rater reliability,
internal reliability, item analyses, and construct validity.
Results:
Inter-rater correlations ranged from 0.76 to
0.98 for individual items. Cronbach's
was 0.88. Item difficulties ranged from moderate to difficult, all with positive and strong ability
to discriminate between candidates. Experts scored consistently higher
than novices. On the 212 point test, the novice mean was 95.6 and the
expert mean was 147.5 (P<0.001). On individual items, a higher
proportion of experts than novices earned passing scores on 15 of the
17 items.
Conclusion:
The Fresno test is a reliable and valid
test for detecting the effect of instruction in evidence based
medicine. Its use in other settings requires further exploration.
Instruction in evidence based medicine is provided in many medical
education settings, but it effectiveness is unknown
The Fresno test measures a wide range of knowledge and skills necessary
for evidence based practice
Read all Rapid Responses