BMJ 2003;326:258 ( 1 February )

Primary care

Setting standards based on patients' views on access and continuity: secondary analysis of data from the general practice assessment survey

Peter Bower, senior research fellowa Martin Roland, directora John Campbell, professorb Nicola Mead, research fellowa

a National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, b Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Peninsula Medical School, Exeter EX2 5DW

Correspondence to: P Bower peter.bower{at}man.ac.uk

Objectives: To examine patients' views on access and continuity in general practice to derive quality standards.
Design: Secondary analysis of data from general practice research studies and routine quality assessment activities undertaken by practices and primary care trusts.
Setting: General practice.
Participants: General practice patients.
Results: Satisfactory standards of access were next day appointments with general practitioners and a 6-10 minute wait for consultations to begin. A satisfactory level of continuity was seeing the same general practitioner "a lot of the time." Standards varied with the analytic method used and by sociodemographic group.
Conclusions: Standards expected by patients in primary care can be derived from linked report-assessment pairs. Patients may have expectations of access that are in excess of government targets. Patients also have high expectations of continuity of care. It is unclear the degree to which such standards are reliable or valid, how conflicts between access and continuity should be resolved, or how these standards relate to other priorities of patients such as high quality interpersonal care.

What is already known on this topic
Standards are increasingly being set for the provision of health services

Surveys and consultation exercises before the NHS plan helped set the standard for a maximum waiting time of 48 hours for appointments to see general practitioners

The optimal methods by which patients should be involved in setting standards and the utility of such standards are unclear

What this study adds
Satisfactory standards of access were next day appointments, a 6-10 minute wait for consultations to begin, and seeing the same general practitioner a lot of the time

Patients may have expectations for access to primary care in excess of current government targets





© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Patients who see the same GP are more satisfied
BMJ 2003 326: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Cheraghi-Sohi, S., Hole, A. R., Mead, N., McDonald, R., Whalley, D., Bower, P., Roland, M. (2008). What Patients Want From Primary Care Consultations: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Identify Patients' Priorities. Ann Fam Med 6: 107-115 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Cheraghi-Sohi, S., Bower, P., Mead, N., McDonald, R., Whalley, D., Roland, M. (2007). Making sense of patient priorities: applying discrete choice methods in primary care using 'think aloud' technique. Fam Pract 24: 276-282 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Zhang, Y., Rohrer, J., Borders, T., Farrell, T. (2007). Patient Satisfaction, Self-Rated Health Status, and Health Confidence: An Assessment of the Utility of Single-Item Questions. American Journal of Medical Quality 22: 42-49 [Abstract]  
  • Sans-Corrales, M., Pujol-Ribera, E., Gene-Badia, J., Pasarin-Rua, M. I., Iglesias-Perez, B., Casajuana-Brunet, J. (2006). Family medicine attributes related to satisfaction, health and costs. Fam Pract 23: 308-316 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Campbell, J. L, Ramsay, J., Green, J., Harvey, K. (2005). Forty-eight hour access to primary care: practice factors predicting patients' perceptions. Fam Pract 22: 266-268 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Lacy, N. L., Paulman, A., Reuter, M. D., Lovejoy, B. (2004). Why We Don't Come: Patient Perceptions on No-Shows. Ann Fam Med 2: 541-545 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • McBurney, P. G., Moran, C. M., Ector, W. L., Quattlebaum, T. G., Darden, P. M. (2004). Time in Continuity Clinic as a Predictor of Continuity of Care for Pediatric Residents. Pediatrics 114: 1023-1027 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Randolph, G. D., Murray, M., Swanson, J. A., Margolis, P. A. (2004). Behind Schedule: Improving Access to Care for Children One Practice at a Time. Pediatrics 113: e230-237 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Lord, J (2003). Future of primary healthcare education: current problems and potential solutions. Postgrad. Med. J. 79: 553-560 [Abstract] [Full text]  



Student BMJ

Intimate examinations

Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview