Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Peter Murchie a Department of General Practice and
Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill Health Centre,
Aberdeen AB25 2AY, b Westburn Centre,
Aberdeen AB25 2XG
Correspondence to: P Murchie
p.murchie{at}abdn.ac.uk
Objectives:
To evaluate the effects of nurse led
clinics in primary care on secondary prevention, total mortality, and coronary event rates after four years.
What is already known on this topic
Secondary prevention programmes for coronary heart disease have
improved short term outcomes such as processes of care and quality of
life What this study adds
Improved medical and lifestyle components of secondary prevention
produced by nurse led clinics seem to lead to fewer total deaths and
coronary events
Design:
Follow up of a randomised controlled trial by
postal questionnaires and review of case notes and national datasets.
Setting:
Stratified, random sample of 19 general
practices in north east Scotland.
Participants:
1343 patients (673 intervention and 670 control) under 80 years with a working diagnosis of coronary heart
disease but without terminal illness or dementia and not housebound.
Intervention:
Nurse led secondary prevention clinics
promoted medical and lifestyle components of secondary prevention and
offered regular follow up for one year.
Main outcome measures:
Components of secondary
prevention (aspirin, blood pressure management, lipid management,
healthy diet, exercise, non-smoking), total mortality, and coronary
events (non-fatal myocardial infarctions and coronary deaths).
Results:
Mean follow up was at 4.7 years.
Significant improvements were shown in the intervention group in all
components of secondary prevention except smoking at one year, and
these were sustained after four years except for exercise. The control group, most of whom attended clinics after the initial year, caught up
before final follow up, and differences between groups were no longer
significant. At 4.7 years, 100 patients in the intervention group and
128 in the control group had died: cumulative death rates were 14.5%
and 18.9%, respectively (P=0.038). 100 coronary events occurred in
the intervention group and 125 in the control group: cumulative event
rates were 14.2% and 18.2%, respectively (P=0.052). Adjusting for
age, sex, general practice, and baseline secondary prevention,
proportional hazard ratios were 0.75 for all deaths (95% confidence
intervals 0.58 to 0.98; P=0.036) and 0.76 for coronary events (0.58 to 1.00; P=0.049)
Conclusions:
Nurse led secondary prevention improved
medical and lifestyle components of secondary prevention and this
seemed to lead to significantly fewer total deaths and probably fewer coronary events. Secondary prevention clinics should be started sooner
rather than later.
Several effective interventions exist for the secondary prevention of
coronary heart disease, but implementing them in practice has proved
difficult
Short term improvements in uptake of secondary prevention produced by
nurse led clinics are maintained in the longer term
Read all Rapid Responses